Switch to git?

[Klaim - Joël Lamotte]

As I am working on different organization problem with the code repositories, 
I'm starting to think that maybe it would benefit visibility of Art Of Sequence projects

if everything was just on GitHub.com, which imply using git instead of mercurial.

I'm a bit reticent to use Git because it's an anti-human-interface tool to me,

but it's still very useful like Mercurial and is well known by a lot of developers.

Moving the project to GitHub would have the main benefit of exposing the code
to more people than on BitBucket (even if it's the second well known source control 
host).

As for now nobody participated to the code, I suppose if I change the repository tool

it better have to be now instead of when participations will come.

So I'm asking here: does someone around here have any concern against switching to git or 
support the move?

Joel Lamotte

[Joonhwan Lee]

Hi 

I am more confortable in github than bitbucket. That sounds great for me.

2013년 2월 14일 목요일에 Klaim - Joël Lamotte님이 작성:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Art Of Sequence Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to aos-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
이준환
www.joonhwan.org

[Klaim - Joël Lamotte]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Joonhwan Lee <joonhw...@gmail.com> wrote:

I am more confortable in github than bitbucket. That sounds great for me.

Thanks for your feedback. I think it's true also for most developers I've met that were interested in this project.

Joel Lamotte