Hi Andy
You can output one (example) face for each path, with wythoff -u
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1vF_ -u -a cube | antiview
You can see that the with your pattern the example face has entirely
covered a original cube face. Looking at the OFF output
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1vF_ -u cube
You can see that this face has 12 sides!
Compare with the wythoff pattern for kis
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v,1E -u -a cube | antiview
This has created a triangle face (which is what is expected for the
Conway operator kis), and has also created a digon on an original cube
edge.
The second path in this pattern, 1E, which made the digon, isn't
especially useful when the pattern is applied to a polyhedron, where
the E elements are all "2-fold". However, if the E elements are not
2-fold, then there will be holes in the final tiling.
For example
Relabel the face and edge elements, with and without the extra path
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v,1E -u -a -r EVF cube | antiview
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v,1E -r EVF cube | antiview
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v -u -a -r EVF cube | antiview
wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v -r EVF cube | antiview
Similarly, the input to wythoff might be a meta-tiling that does not
correspond to a polyhedron, and the result will not be a closed tiling
without the extra path (notice wythoff -M, to indicate that the input
should be treated as a meta-tiling)
unitile2d -s t -l 12 -w 6 2 | antiview
unitile2d -s t -l 12 -w 6 2 | wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v -M | antiview
unitile2d -s t -l 12 -w 6 2 | wythoff -p [F,V]0_1v1v,1E -M | antiview
Adrian.
--
Adrian Rossiter -
adr...@antiprism.com
http://www.instagram.com/adrian_rossiter
http://antiprism.com/adrian