Tony Bushby's The Bible Fraud: A Critique
CENTRO ANTI-BLASFEMIA
What Letter? A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U-V W XYZ
What Bible Book?
GenesisExodusLeviticusNumbersDeuteronomyJoshuaJudgesRuth1 Samuel2
Samuel1 Kings2 Kings1 Chronicles2 ChroniclesEzra-NehemiahEsther-
JobPsalmsProverbsEcclesiastes-SongIsaiahJeremiah-
Lam.EzekielDanielHosea-JoelAmos-ObadiahJonah-MicahNahum-
HabakkukZephaniah-HaggaiZachariah-MalachiMatthewMarkLuke-
ActsJohnRomans1 & 2 CorinthiansGalatiansEph & PhilippiansColossians1 &
2 ThessaloniansPastorals/PhilemonHebrewsJames1 and 2 Peter1, 2, 3
John, JudeRevelation
Keyword Search
Get a stripped-down copy of this page.
The Bible Fraud by Tony Bushby has the inauthentic Pope Leo X quote on
the cover. That turns out to be thematic.
Let's start with a summary of the plot:
Jesus married Mary Magdalene as well as two other women in his
lifetime. Mary was a descendant of King Herod and Jesus was a
descendant of a Celtic king named Lud. (I don't know how a Celtic
managed to work his way to, and survive in, Jewish Palestine, where
he'd stick out like the sorest thumb this side of Los Angeles.)
Jesus' line eventually fostered Constantine [15]. However, Jesus and a
twin brother named Judas Khrestus (?!) were "conceived by rape or
adultery" between a member of Herod's family and the Emperor Tiberius.
[41] Some stories in the Gospels, like the Temple cleansing, are
actually about Khrestus [67] and this Khrestus escaped a sentence of
crucifixion imposed by Caligula in 37 by appealing to an "age-old
tradition" that allowed him to have someone sub in for him [84].
Judas later went to India to learn things [90]. Jesus became a king of
Britain named Cunobelinus [108] where he also joined a Druidic order
[115] and acquired the name Bran the Blessed [117].
He was later captured by Rome in war [125] but escaped execution
because of his connections with Roman aristocracy. He later went to
Egypt to be initiated into mysteries [141] but sometime later was
stoned to death [153].
Clues for this whole story can be found in all sorts of places ranging
from conveniently inaccessible manuscripts to statues in France and
even in the works of Shakespeare. Unfortunately, much of what would
prove this has been burned by the church, and other things have been
edited or interpolated to hide all this.
That's it. Now if you're still thinking this might have some credence,
here's some particulars analyzed.
Bushby thinks his book was predicted by Nostradamus [11].
Many of his sources are -- conveniently -- "preserved in rare archival
manuiscripts and difficult-to-find reference books." Among these
sources are such items as the "Myvyean Manuscript" [18] in the British
Museum. For some reason the only actual reference to this document
anywhere online comes from references to Bushby.
And little wonder why. Tekton Research Assistant "Punkish" won the
Gold Star of his life with this one -- he lives in the UK, and was
able to contact the British Museum about this. His report:
I wrote to the British Library (who now house the manuscript
collection that used to be kept at the British Museum) about this
"Myvyean manuscript" and the official reply from Michael St.John-
McAlister, the Curator of the Dept. of Manuscripts is this:
"I am afraid that I can find no reference to such a manuscript in our
collections. We receive many similar enquiries relating to subject
matter such as this and I have to say many of them are hoaxes or refer
to non-existent manuscripts."
So much for Bushby as a credible source on alleged mystery documents.
In addition, because many people will disagree with his book, Bushby
will "not engage in written religious argument with readers" who
disagree. [12]
The words "non sequitur" spring to mind.
Sir Francis Bacon edited the KJV [20]. Now this is an idea you do see
offered up on some websites, but not one of them I have found to be of
any academic bent. The source Bushby gives is by an author named
Alfred Dodd who wrote some rather peculiar books like Shakespeare:
Creator of Freemasonry. (He also appeals to "original documents" in
the British museum that allegedly prove this, but are conveniently
unquoted and unreferenced otherwise.)
The idea that Bacon had some part in the KJV is so outraegous that
apparently not even the folks at Wikipedia are willing to let it
stand.
Bacon is also said to have edited the plays of Shakespeare and added
secret messages....on that one, I'll refer to a lively discussion here
by an academic source and a rather detailed discussion here by someone
who passes the critical source test.
Morton Smith is used as a source with his Secret Gospel of Mark and
claim that a tombstone in Germany of a Roman soldier may have been
that of Jesus' father [29].
It's not quite The Da Vinci Code, but the Last Supper is used for an
argument as it is claimed that one of the disicples (the fifth from
the right of Jesus) looks like Jesus' twin, thus evidently showing
Leonrado believed in Bushby's twin theory.
From what I see of that painting, that's as much imagination as Dan
Brown offers to make John a woman; it is an idea also found on some
conspiracy-theory sites, but the resemblance is highly superficial and
the alleged "twin" has a chin that juts out rather more than Jesus'.
Michealangelo is also said to have endorsed this idea, as well as
Raphael, but what Bushby takes for twin sons of Mary are always taken
by credible art historians as the infants Jesus and John the Baptist.
Bushby dismisses this by claiming that the boys are "identical" which
is quite imaginative and clearly false:
The hairstyles and color are entirely different; the chins do not
match, and little John already has on his prophetic garment, while
Jesus is the only one with a halo.
Also in common with Dan Brown, Bushby makes use of the legendary Abbe'
Sauniere [47] who allegedly became rich thanks to some secret
documents he found in a hollow pillar in his church in France. Olson
and Miesel say it all in their comments in The Da Vinci Hoax:
[Suaniere] was in fact a simoniac priest whose wealth came from
selling overbooked Masses until he was suspended by his bishop in
1911. The parchments were fake, the pillar was not hollow, and the
tomb was not painted by Nicholas Poussin in his two works titled Et in
Arcadia Ego. The so-called mystery was invented by a local restaurant
owner in the 1950s to attract tourists." [237]
"Old records" of unspecificed origin and nature tell us that the
Pharisees were founded by a "Pharez" who "developed a school of
Predestination" and the Sadducees by one "Sadoc" who was "a disciple
of Antigonus Scohaeus" who had allegedly founded a "School of
Infidels". [51]
Needless to say this is a mix of fact and fiction. The name of the
Pharisees comes from the word perushim, which means separatists.
"Sadducees" is perhaps properly taken from a "Sadoc" -- one of
Solomon's priests in the OT, whom they regarded as their ideological
ancestor, if the derivation is correct -- others argue that it comes
from a Greek word for "fiscal officials" but a connection to this
alleged Antigonus is not one of the options scholars use.
Of course there are no other references to this "School of Infidels"
or this Antigonus online, expect from those copying Bushby.
The Essenes are connected with the Druids of Gaul [523].
Even if the quote from Julian is correct [57] it has the facts
mangled; Paul, Matthew and Mark all equate Jesus with divine Wisdom.
Bushby repeats Harpur's argument about KRST [58].
Bushby claims he made clergy "squirm" by asking about where Jesus was
called a glutton and a drunkard. Such names were simply stock rhetoric
of the time; just as the the Pharisees were not actually vipers and
hypocrites, and also whitewashed walls [64].
The Gauls are the same people as those who lived in Galilee [75].
A microcosm is offered of Remsberg's list [87].
Bushby repeats an Anglo-Israelist argument I last saw used by Herbert
Armstrong [99] that "British" combines the two Hebrew words for
covenant (berit) and man (ish). More serious sources connect the name
to that of a tribe of Picts, the Pritani. Also the home of Mary
Magdalene, Dalmanutha [105], is in South Wales.
Paul [134] at one point had to flee to Wales and there was protected.
One source for this information is "an ancient manuscript in Merton
College".
Bushby uses the "Bacchus on the cross" gem of Freke and Gandy [197] --
yes, the one that's a forgery -- as well as offering all the usual
copycat candidates (Mithra, Attis, etc.)
I really see no need to say more. The ideas Bushby propounds lend
little credence to the rest of what he writes, though of course anyone
who wishes to have me look into specific claims made by Bushby is
welcome to request that I do so.
-JPH