Thanks for the feedback - not sure how exactly this is designed. But I was thinking more about the logic of what's being shown in AnM and your clone based on this. Comparing the liability accounts (I think it's the same for all AnM types of this kind, so Other Liability, Credit card, Line of Credit, ...definitely the first two) AnM seems to use the same transaction entry template for all types of transactions, but then Increase / Decrease are somehow reversed for these liability accounts.
Then I looked again at how this detail is displayed as a result in the Account Detail transaction listing screen - and that's where, as I've just noted in the tester feedback your AndMoney Clone now has the reverse display convention for each transaction for the Increase / Decrease, i.e. increases =negative, reductions = positive and the closing balance in the Account follows the same sign convention.
Comparing back to AnM - and that's probably where some of my confusion about the labels in the past has come from - AnM shows the movements in the transactions, I think I can say it this way, just as for an Asset account and not as in the Clone. That is the other way around to the above. Hence there the closing balance has the reverse sign for a Liability account, to when it comes forward to the Accounts summary (which is a bit odd!).
Hence I was left wondering - was this a bug in AnM which you've fixed, or have you made a deliberate change in the Clone?...I think I like the new logic better.
Thanks. RAB