I ordered a few sets of Descent after I watched a friend play and after opening a few boxes I mixed up the cards. Now is there a way to unmix them? I don't remember which cards went to which expansion... I'm not sure if it matters that they are mixed up, but it seems like it does.
No, it doesn't matter if cards are mixed up. The game is designed to be mixed and matches at will. You can play any subclass in any expansion. You can buy any item at the shop from any expansion as well.
Only overlord cards are played "face down". Everything else is displayed on sight, and marked exactly when to use. For example, act 2 shop items are marked with a "II". If more expansions are mixed in, that just means you'll have more loot to choose from in Act II. There are some scenarios (tutorial for example) that will tell you exactly what to bring to the table. Having more cards, just means more options for all the players.
A side comment, I'd check the app if you haven't yet. It basically plays the Overlord (which almost no one likes to play), and you and your friend just play the heroes. The app is called descent road to legend, and it's available on Steam, iOS and Android for free. It uses every expansion you have (you select them in an option), although only in side quests, and minions. They just launched The Delve, a campaign that'll mix and match content from all your expansions, but it's payed for (5$). I'd try the general campaign first, and then if you enjoyed it, go for the Delve (which is much more re-playable).
While some FFG games like Arkham Horror function best with just one or two expansions and can become unwieldy with more, Descent just gets better and better with each expansion added, just like @CyberClaw mentioned. And as @goldPseudo mentioned, there are typically small icons on the card to indicate the set each card belongs to.
For more information on those icons and a quick reference to which set they belong to, the Descent Wiki - Expansions page can be extremely useful, as each expansion's detail page lists not only the detailed contents of the expansion, but also the set icon for that expansion.
If I came across this story in a magazine, I wouldn't read beyond the first paragraph, except out of curiosity as to whether it was all so dreadful. (It is.) Like the dog walking on its hind legs, the wonder is not that it is done well, but that it is done at all.
I used ChatGPT for a similar purpose and found the same idea. If asked to write an entire story it balks: "That's a tall order, Dave..." but it will gladly provide a detailed outline for the premise, with constructive ideas about character development, tension, etc.
Dr. Elara Sterling sat in her office, the soft hum of the quantum computer in the corner a comforting presence. The walls were adorned with holographic projections of her favorite literary works, a testament to her love for the written word in a world dominated by digital consciousness.
She was studying the latest data from the consciousness network, a vast digital realm where human minds coexisted with artificial intelligences. It was a world of infinite possibilities, a testament to humanity's technological prowess. But today, something was amiss.
A pattern had emerged in the data, an anomaly that defied explanation. It was subtle, almost imperceptible, but Elara's trained eye had caught it. It was an echo, a ripple in the digital fabric of the consciousness network.
Days turned into nights as Elara delved deeper into the mystery. She consulted with colleagues, ran simulations, and even reached out to the AI entities within the network. But the echo remained a mystery, an enigma that seemed to mock her efforts.
--
The novella, tentatively titled "Echoes in the Stone", audaciously attempts to delve into a preposterous hypothesis - that an intelligent dinosaur civilization might have existed before humankind even set foot on this Earth. It brazenly ventures into the realm of speculative fiction, presenting a tale that bristles with palaeontological intrigue and daring conjectures.
In this outrageous narrative, Dr. Ada Worthington, a stoic palaeontologist, and her mentor, Dr. Leo Hartman, grapple with a discovery of a lifetime - an anomalously symmetric structure buried deep within Earth's crust. As the story unfolds, their exploration not only challenges our conventional understanding of Earth's prehistoric past but also toys with the narrative of anthropocentric superiority.
However, one must lament the novella's insipid delivery. Character development is absent. The protagonists, Dr. Ada Worthington and Dr. Leo Hartman, are devoid of human complexity and depth, reduced to mere pawns maneuvered by the whims of the plot. The narrative is rife with hackneyed phrases and turgid prose, with heavy-handed foreshadowing that lacks the subtlety of skillful storytelling.
The author's intent to blend scientific curiosity with speculative fiction is commendable but the execution falls flat. The narrative is deprived of emotional depth, leaving the reader alienated from the enormity of the situation. The text lacks the lyrical quality necessary to evoke the grandeur of such a monumental revelation.
There is also an issue of credibility that haunts the narrative. It recklessly presents its hypothesis as fact, with an unjustified confidence that borders on the ludicrous. The absence of logical explanations and scientific grounding reduces the potential impact of this unconventional premise. Without these, the narrative remains a far-fetched tale, lacking the necessary underpinning to become a resonant piece of speculative fiction.
In conclusion, "Echoes in the Stone" is an ambitious attempt that misses its mark by a wide margin. It succumbs to its own audacity, presenting a tale that is neither persuasive nor engaging. In its attempt to weave a tale of prehistoric science fiction, it fails to resonate on either scientific or humanistic grounds. Instead, it leaves the reader stranded in a desolate landscape of incredulous ideas and lackluster storytelling.
This has less of the fingernails-along-a-blackboard feeling given off by every sentence of the original story, and it makes some correct points about why the original is so bad, but it has little else to recommend it. It has the same overuse of adjectives and adverbs, often poorly chosen (there is no such thing as an "incredulous" idea). Like the story it criticises, it too is "rife with hackneyed phrases and turgid prose".
It is confused about the nature of fiction, as it criticises the story as if it were a presentation of fact: "It recklessly presents its hypothesis as fact, with an unjustified confidence that borders on the ludicrous." As fiction it is doing no such thing. It can rightly be criticised, as other commenters have done, for thrumming spectrometers and bad geology, because such background details are the sort of thing a story needs to get right. Intelligent dinosaurs in the past are its jumping off point, the "one change" that many SF stories start from and follow out the implications of.
"Nottingham has enough pubs and clubs", say the local police. If you wanted to get around every last one of them it would be a year at a brisk trot before you were starting to visit establishments more than one mile from the centre of the city. Pick a Friday or a Saturday, any Friday or Saturday of the year: the establishments will be rammed and jumping and the streets bustling with people in their most tightly-wound and elaborately crafted drinking costumes. It's almost Christmas but the cold season has not added much to the average number of layers.
The book was better than the movie. For one thing, there was a lot more in it. And some of the pictures were awfully different from the movie. But in both, Pinocchio - a life-sized wooden boy who magically is roused to life - wore a kind of halter, and there seemed to be dowels in his joints. When Geppetto is just finishing the construction of Pinocchio, he turns his back on the puppet and is promptly sent flying by a well-placed kick. At that instant the carpenter's friend arrives and asks him what he is doing sprawled on the floor.
He closed his eyes, feeling the rush of displaced seconds, the vertigo of time stretching, condensing, then snapping back into place. When he opened them, he found the world stilled. The shadows were now statues, the sun paused in its descent, and a bird hung motionless in the sky. This was Finn's minute - his extra minute.
Yeah, I know, sounds like the beginning of a fairy tale or a bedtime story, right? But I promise you, on my physicist-turned-astronaut honor, this isn't fiction. It's the raw, unadulterated truth. My truth.
Red soil underfoot, as fine as confectioner's sugar. Low-grav shuffle making every step a dance move. Peaks and valleys sprawled across the horizon like a mythological beast sleeping off a hard night.
Then, as abruptly as it began, the light faded. Billy blinked, expecting to see a spaceman, green and with eyes as big as dinner plates, but instead, there was a rock. A simple, gleaming, alien rock, sat innocently in the middle of his vegetable patch.
For in the silence of their failure, a sound, inaudible to human ears but felt in the marrow of their bones, resonated from the vessel, wrapping the men in a shroud of madness. One by one, they fell, their minds invaded by images of cosmic horror, their sanity shredded by the unintelligible secrets whispered by the alien ship.
Standish was the last to succumb, his face a rictus of terror as he stared at the vessel. As the sun dipped below the horizon, plunging the valley into an unfathomable darkness, Standish's final cry echoed through the hills of Belseth, marking the tragic end of their misguided endeavour.
No, I ain't pullin' your leg, sonny, it's the God's honest truth. It happened in our little town of Lonesome Hollow, right there in the foothills of the Appalachians. It's a tale that puts the 'odd' in odds and ends, I tell you.
7fc3f7cf58