Issue 30 in android-xmlrpc: XMLRPCException should save HTTP status code

4 views
Skip to first unread message

android...@googlecode.com

unread,
Aug 15, 2011, 8:46:18 AM8/15/11
to android-x...@googlegroups.com
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 30 by bigmike.MK: XMLRPCException should save HTTP status code
http://code.google.com/p/android-xmlrpc/issues/detail?id=30

It would be useful in some situations to store the HTTP status code, so
that an application can handle these causes differently, e.g. show an
authentication dialog if the code was 403.

I am attaching a patch that does this.

Attachments:
save_http_status.patch 1.5 KB

android...@googlecode.com

unread,
Aug 15, 2011, 8:58:21 AM8/15/11
to android-x...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: j...@sprig.gs
Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement Priority-Low

Comment #1 on issue 30 by j...@sprig.gs: XMLRPCException should save HTTP
status code
http://code.google.com/p/android-xmlrpc/issues/detail?id=30

Thanks for this bigmike.MK. I'll check that it goes in OK, and will apply
it to the code shortly.

android...@googlecode.com

unread,
Sep 14, 2011, 8:26:26 AM9/14/11
to android-x...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Owner: ---

Comment #2 on issue 30 by j...@sprig.gs: XMLRPCException should save HTTP
status code
http://code.google.com/p/android-xmlrpc/issues/detail?id=30

I'm no longer able to commit time to this project, and as such, I am
removing myself from any tickets I've previously been involved in.

android...@googlecode.com

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 4:07:37 AM12/28/11
to android-x...@googlegroups.com

Comment #3 on issue 30 by bigmike.MK: XMLRPCException should save HTTP
status code
http://code.google.com/p/android-xmlrpc/issues/detail?id=30

Anybody else who could have a look at this? It's really a tiny patch.

android...@googlecode.com

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 5:37:59 AM12/29/11
to android-x...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #4 on issue 30 by psk...@gmail.com: XMLRPCException should save

This issue was closed by revision r28.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages