Odd. Mount command should work fine without any options for squashfs. At
least it does on my Ubuntu server.
Most likely a bug with whatever mount command is in your build. Does
busybox mount work for the same command ?
I never had any issues with Houdini not mounting in any of the builds
I've ever tried, both my custom ones and stock ones from the website.
On 2020-07-10 13:17, Katharine Chui wrote:
>
> Hmm but it did not..
> For example in android 9.0 r2 with kernel 4.19.110
> If ro is not specified to mount, mount tries to use losetup without
> supplying -r, losetup fails complaining about file target being read
> only and refuses to map file to loop device
>
>
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 11:46:09 AM UTC+2
wdmo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-10 10:20, Katharine Chui wrote:
> > Other than that, building houdini7_y.sfs and houdini7_z.sfs into
> > /system/etc also made me realize that the current
> enable_nativebridge
> > script tries to mount those sfs using a rw loop device, causing
> that
> > to fail. Since houdini$v.sfs are read only anyway, and mount -o ro
> > /system/etc/houdini$v.sfs $dest_dir works with read only system, I
> > propose that ro should be supplied to the mount option
> >
> Kernel will automatically fall back to ro for read-only file systems,
> like SquashFS or ISO9660 even if you don't specify ro during mount.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android-x86" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
android-x86...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
android-x86...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/android-x86/61995aab-7a3f-496b-b296-c8fe256affc4n%40googlegroups.com
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/android-x86/61995aab-7a3f-496b-b296-c8fe256affc4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.