JavascriptAPI 4.1 : when adding a label grapgic layer in offline maps locally deployed and using text symbol, the label is not shown and it gives an error as mapview-invalid-resource, couldn't find font arial-unicode-ms-regular. falling back to Arial Unicode MS Regular. No matter what font family you set it aslways show this error. and lebels are never shown.
This is when trying to use the DistanceMeasurement2D and AreaMeasurement2D widgets. The graphics are not drawing correctly on the map when using the widgets. This is the standard map view, not using a webmap.
I recognize this is old, and may not even be the same issue. But in case it is helpful for anyone else. I was having the same issue as JoshKing and (sort of related to the OP's issue) RE font error. When looking at network traffic looked like I was getting a 403 when the API was trying to call -unicode-ms-regular/0-255.pbf to get the font for the measure widget's labels.
See my reply to you in the other thread.Arial Unicode MS is a single font. The "other software packages" you refer to -- probably word processors -- undoubtedly have the ability to create faux bold.If you're able to change type weight in ID, that's because those weights exist as individual fonts within a type family.=-= Harron =-=
It is such a big monster because it has the full (or almost full) Unicode character set in it. I don't think there's any wisdom in such fonts--they can be useful only to people producing books with titles like "All the characters of the world", of which there aren't many... Well, there's "Writing systems of the World", true.Peter
Why is Arial Unicode (arialuni.ttf) so large in comparison with other fonts in my fonts list? My computer informs me that it is 22,730 Kb while other font files are around 133 Kb or so. Yikes! What is that monster and when did it show up in my fonts? I don't recall explicitly installing it. Any tidbits of wisdom?Thanks,Mike Witherell in Washington D.C.
Imagine an international company that has to deal with something like 40
different languages in perhaps twice as many countries and ensure consist
look and be absolutely sure that the information is correctly displayed.Add to that the easy maintenance of that company's tens of thousands of
computers in hundreds of offices...Or, if you have a name like mine (or for that matter, like names of half the
worlds population) then you also appreciate that it is transferred and
displayed correctly, rather than being totally messed up somewhere along the
way...In other words:Viva Unicode!Richard Rnnbck, Adobe Systems Nordic
Viva Unicode indeed. I'm a big fan of Unicode. But I don't see why all those symbols/characters should be in one font file. It makes sense to put into one file those characters that need to be mixed, such as maths and phonetics with 'standard' roman type, because you can't kern across font files. Greek, Cyrillic, Hindi, etc., can just as happily sit in different files since these scripts are not mixed.The use of Unicode is that all characters are assigned a code that is standardized across platforms--that all those characters should be in one file does not follow.Peter
There are Unicode subset fonts... just not a lot of them. For example, Bitstream Cyberbit is a huge font file, but if you want only the Asian characters, you can get Cyberbit CJK.Similarly, MS Mincho and MS Gothic are Japanese fonts that conform to Unicode encoding.One can hope there will be more in time, especially because OpenType is based on Unicode encoding.=-= Harron =-=
One good use I can think of is when you're storing a whole bunch of text of various unknown sources/languages in a database, and you want to be able to display and print it. The same field using different languages.T
It's also possible(but unlikely) that you don't actually have the arial bold font file on your computer. To check, open a command prompt, move to c:\windows\fonts and type dir arial*.*. My computer show this
The 4 first files correspond to Arial regular, bold, bold italics and italics. If you only have the arial.ttf, then the others aren't installed. Note. You have to do this in a command window, because Windows applies a special format to the fonts directory in File Explorer and you can never show all font file names
You can still get a bold effect in programs like Word, without the specific files, the because the Windows font rendering system can use the regular font and simulate bold and italics. Though I'm not privy to the inner workings of the Alteryx rendering engine, I think it's probably trying to specify the font files to be included in the output document and can't find the arialdb.ttf file.
I will check if I have Arial bold installed. I was under the impression that if I could use it in my word document, I would have it installed on my pc. I will check that route on Monday, and I will definitely let you know.
I don't actually know how (to me it seems like it happened completely randomly) but I started up Firefox today and Wikipeda was displayed entirely in bold. After checking my problem on Google, I discovered that Google as well displayed every piece of text in bold. This has never happened before, and any search on my problem offers both solutions that do not solve the problem, and are relevant only to version 3.0 and 4.0 of firefox. Please help.
I believe my Arial font may have been corrupted by an old game (Age of Empires II) I installed and played with my kids this past weekend. This solved my problem. Try going to the fonts control panel by clicking start, control panel, then fonts. If you don't see "fonts" then look at the upper right of your control panel for the "view by" option and choose "small icons". You can also find it in Windows explorer by navigating to your Windows folder and then the fonts folder. Mine is at c:\windows\fonts. Once you are there, copy the Arial font by right clicking on it and choosing "copy" and paste it in a temporary folder of your choice or on the desktop. You can also just drag it to another folder or onto the desktop. It should paste about 9 different versions of the Arial font. Go to the folder you just pasted it to, right click arial.ttf and choose copy and then return to the fonts control panel, right click anywhere and choose paste. It should say the font is already installed and ask if you want to replace it. Say yes for all instances. If you dragged it to the desktop, then just drag it back to the fonts control panel and say yes to all the install questions. Hope this helps you. If you can't find the arial font in the fonts control panel, then your problem is most likely that it was deleted. You will have to download it from somewhere and re-install it. Sorry I can't help you with that.
I've attached a snipping of a random wikipedia page, as well as a random google search, to show you what it looks like. Another interesting fact that might help; I tried typing in Arial in word, and it works fine. However, Arial Black has no difference between bold and non-bold.
I don't have an ATI graphics card. I actually have a toshiba satellite with an AMD Radeon HD 6250 Graphics card. Is it possible that my Radeon could have a similar problem, or is this an ATI exclusive problem?
Morphological filtering is a kind of anti-aliasing, so finding and disabling anything having to do with anti-aliasing in your graphic driver settings might or might not help, (assuming you don't find a morphological filtering setting. It may be called morphological filtering anti-aliasing, or MFAA for short.)
Anyways, I am running an Nvidia GTS450 and the problem is happening to me as well, and I don't have a morphological filter setting anywhere in the nvidia drivers. I have manually turned off anti-aliasing in firefox, and don't see a change. It appears that all my internet browsers are affected. (IE9, Firefox 7) I can't tell if it is working in other apps because I don't know what it should look like.
I can't seem to find a AMD equivalent to Catalyst Control Center, so I really don't know if and how I can disable Morphological Filtering. This only started happening a few days ago, and I've had this laptop for several months, and considering I haven't tinkered around with ANY video card options, I don't know if the problem would even be something like that. The only significant changes that I recently made are installing Age Of Empires, StarCraft, RollerCoaster Tycoon 2 and 3, and a boatload of steam games. I have windows 7, and as I said previously, I have a toshiba satellite with an AMD Radeon HD 6250 Graphics card.
3a8082e126