Biopore
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Daril Atkins
Sep 22, 2009, 9:42:02 AM9/22/09
to Anaplastology
Does anyone know about 'Biopore' surgical implants for facial
reconstruction? I mean in terms of clinical based evidence.
Daril Atkins
reconstruction? I mean in terms of clinical based evidence.
Daril Atkins
Kuldeep Raizada, Ocularist
Sep 23, 2009, 5:22:01 AM9/23/09
to anapla...@googlegroups.com
Dear Daril: We were one of the group who has started this Implant study in early 2005, with this group we have done a study did multicenter clinical trial and see the long term relations and clinically it comes out to be a bad implant 75-80% of the implant has been extruded and now a days it is almost close in india, very rarely any one encouraging
regards
Kuldeep
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kuldeep Raizada, Ph D,Clinical Ocularist & Anaplastologist
Department of Ocular and Orbital Prosthesis
LV Prasad Eye Institute,
Hyderabad, INDIA.
E-mail: ocul...@gmail.com
Mobile: (91)-984 919-3447
Office: (91)-40-3061-2332
Fax:(91)-40-2354-8271
Web:www.lvpei.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
regards
Kuldeep
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kuldeep Raizada, Ph D,Clinical Ocularist & Anaplastologist
Department of Ocular and Orbital Prosthesis
LV Prasad Eye Institute,
Hyderabad, INDIA.
E-mail: ocul...@gmail.com
Mobile: (91)-984 919-3447
Office: (91)-40-3061-2332
Fax:(91)-40-2354-8271
Web:www.lvpei.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daril Atkins
Sep 25, 2009, 4:51:35 AM9/25/09
to Anaplastology
Thanks Kuldeep.
Do you know of anyone elsewhere who has also tried 'Biopore'
On Sep 23, 1:22 pm, "Kuldeep Raizada, Ocularist" <ocular...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you know of anyone elsewhere who has also tried 'Biopore'
On Sep 23, 1:22 pm, "Kuldeep Raizada, Ocularist" <ocular...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Daril: We were one of the group who has started this Implant study in
> early 2005, with this group we have done a study did multicenter clinical
> trial and see the long term relations and clinically it comes out to be a
> bad implant 75-80% of the implant has been extruded and now a days it is
> almost close in india, very rarely any one encouraging
> regards
> Kuldeep
>
> early 2005, with this group we have done a study did multicenter clinical
> trial and see the long term relations and clinically it comes out to be a
> bad implant 75-80% of the implant has been extruded and now a days it is
> almost close in india, very rarely any one encouraging
> regards
> Kuldeep
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Daril Atkins <darilatkin...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Does anyone know about 'Biopore' surgical implants for facial
> > reconstruction? I mean in terms of clinical based evidence.
>
> > Daril Atkins
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> > Does anyone know about 'Biopore' surgical implants for facial
> > reconstruction? I mean in terms of clinical based evidence.
>
> > Daril Atkins
>
> --
> Kuldeep Raizada, Ph D,Clinical Ocularist & Anaplastologist
> Department of Ocular and Orbital Prosthesis
> LV Prasad Eye Institute,
> Hyderabad, INDIA.
> E-mail: ocular...@gmail.com
> Department of Ocular and Orbital Prosthesis
> LV Prasad Eye Institute,
> Hyderabad, INDIA.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daril Atkins
Oct 1, 2009, 11:14:46 PM10/1/09
to Anaplastology
Hello Kuldeep, once again, I was wondering if you or the OculoPlastic
surgeons have published a paper on your findings. Secondly I presume
that your comments pertain to orbital implants, and quite possibly
pertain to problems after the pegging stage. The Medpor implants are
made of the same linear hdpe material, so would you be saying that
linear hdpe implants can create problems post-op? If not, then could
it be surgical procedure or the integrity of the implant itself?
Daril Atkins
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
surgeons have published a paper on your findings. Secondly I presume
that your comments pertain to orbital implants, and quite possibly
pertain to problems after the pegging stage. The Medpor implants are
made of the same linear hdpe material, so would you be saying that
linear hdpe implants can create problems post-op? If not, then could
it be surgical procedure or the integrity of the implant itself?
Daril Atkins
>
> - Show quoted text -
Kuldeep Raizada, Ocularist
Oct 2, 2009, 12:18:09 AM10/2/09
to anapla...@googlegroups.com
Dear Daril: These implants and Medpore as the basic material is same but how ever some thing wrong with this particular implant as most of these BIOPORE implant have an issue even with out pegging they prone to extrude from 2 weeks to one year time duration.
we are putting medpor since 2000, we haa a few case that extrude, but we could able to manage well with small surgery, but these implants are tough to manage as the raw surface of necrotizing tissue does not allow us to work furrther
if you look at the extrusion rate with Medpor compare to HA implant, HA implant have higher extrusion than Medpor
i would say that basic structure of the implant Chemistry is now as good as medpor, even having the same material as company complaints, Porous Polyethethelene.
Regards
Kuldeep
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kuldeep Raizada, Ph D,Clinical Ocularist & Anaplastologist
Department of Ocular and Orbital Prosthesis
LV Prasad Eye Institute,
Hyderabad, INDIA.
E-mail: ocul...@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
we are putting medpor since 2000, we haa a few case that extrude, but we could able to manage well with small surgery, but these implants are tough to manage as the raw surface of necrotizing tissue does not allow us to work furrther
if you look at the extrusion rate with Medpor compare to HA implant, HA implant have higher extrusion than Medpor
i would say that basic structure of the implant Chemistry is now as good as medpor, even having the same material as company complaints, Porous Polyethethelene.
Regards
Kuldeep
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kuldeep Raizada, Ph D,Clinical Ocularist & Anaplastologist
Department of Ocular and Orbital Prosthesis
LV Prasad Eye Institute,
Hyderabad, INDIA.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages