Hello,
I am dealing with a set of instances regarding production optimization. I am working from AMPL with CPLEX and Gurobi and my
problem is that for several instances
the optimum is different for both
solvers (Gurobi obtains
better optimum in these minimization instances). I read in
this group some similar cases and
Dr. Fourer recommended to adjust the mipgap and other parameters. I have tested in this sense, by varying the relative mipgap and integrality tolerance, and
the results do not change. Besides, I have
checked both solutions and
Gurobi´s is wrong, does
not meet the constraints of the problem. Of
other hand, CPLEX solutions
are correct. Solutions from LPSolve are
similar to CPLEX. I will appreciate your comments.
Thank you in advance,
Javier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "AMPL Modeling Language" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ampl/np3MHqvaugU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to ampl+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to am...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ampl.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.