can't get amp to work with git

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Patrick Aljord

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 9:00:50 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,

amp works great with hg, when I try the binary with git, it fails though:

http://pastie.org/private/5iqktxxcvxy1nsbmo9tx8w

Any idea why?

Thanks in advance,

Pat

Michael Edgar

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 9:05:52 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com
Hi Pat!

Well, git support isn't there just yet, so any tinkering you do is appreciated but not yet supported. We're working on git support and if you check out the latest version of our code, you might not run into this bug.

Our repository is hosted at http://bitbucket.org/carbonica/amp/src - if you still have this bug with the latest version, please open a ticket at the bitbucket.com tracker.

Thanks!

Mike Edgar

Ari Brown

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 9:09:11 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com

On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Michael Edgar wrote:

> Hi Pat!
>
> Well, git support isn't there just yet, so any tinkering you do is appreciated but not yet supported. We're working on git support and if you check out the latest version of our code, you might not run into this bug.
>
> Our repository is hosted at http://bitbucket.org/carbonica/amp/src - if you still have this bug with the latest version, please open a ticket at the bitbucket.com tracker.

Our latest version has some odd bugs in hg. Using it is not advised.

Patrick Aljord

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 9:11:27 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com
Hey Michael,

I thought it was working because I was told yesterday that it was
supported but maybe there was a misunderstanding :)
http://groups.google.com/group/amp-vcs/msg/851a28fd1781a93f

I tried the latest version and now I get that:

http://pastie.org/1085105

Ari Brown

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 9:43:23 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com

Yeah, misunderstanding. I thought you were referring to Hg support. FYI, the current head is busted for Hg, so don't try to use that.

Patrick Aljord

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 10:22:07 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Ari Brown <a...@aribrown.com> wrote:
> Yeah, misunderstanding. I thought you were referring to Hg support. FYI, the current head is busted for Hg, so don't try to use that.

Ok thanks good to know. Is there any ETA on git support for read-only
operations? I asked a few months ago and I was told soon but it's
still not there. I understand that it's a lot of work so I'm not
complaining or anything :). By the way, did you think in using grit?
http://github.com/mojombo/grit

Thanks in advance, Pat.

Ari Brown

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 10:28:52 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com

yeah, we were young and naive back then.

we're looking to do an overhaul of amp, separating interface from implementation. We both have a lot of work to do right now, but we're hoping to get things together soon.

We really owe you one for being so damn patient. You see, we started working furiously on getting git support in, but then we realized holy shit it was harder than we thought.

Grit is good in the meantime, but it shells out, which is what we're looking to replace.

ETA for git read-only support? 40 days.

Michael Edgar

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 10:44:31 PM8/10/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com
ETA for git read-only support? 40 days.

This may be the first realistic estimate we've given for a deadline. It also happens to line up exactly with the end of my internship. Thanks for the pressure, Ari!

Just kidding. We'll do it.

Patrick Aljord

unread,
Aug 12, 2010, 3:29:29 AM8/12/10
to amp...@googlegroups.com
Ok, thanks for the quick answer. I'll check back in 40 days!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages