I couldn't agree with you more.
Your idea about taking our money out of the banks and not depositing
it until things are changed and people held accountable is impressive
- Not many issues or ideas give us much to say or do to change things
with solid and real-world direct action (non-violent and legal
direction action).
Taking our money away from the banks would be quite some impressive
direct action.
It might be difficult to reach enough people to pull this off but who
knows? It's a good line of thinking.
A draft proposal of this proposed bailout plan wants to avoid all
court review!!
(See:
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-no-role-for-court-in-bailout-plan/
)
That's a tip off right there that even bigger scams wait behind the
scenes AND the principle of court review is a core idea in our
Constitution: Checks & Balances. So this bailout deal is going to try
to avoid that, just as Bush has done before.
QUOTE: (From link, above)
"...according to the draft, “decisions by the Secretary pursuant to
the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency
discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any
administrative agency.”
On Sep 21, 3:51 pm, websmith <
websmit...@gmail.com> wrote:
...go to the bank, get your money, and refuse to redeposit it until