[QUESTION] What about a "port" physicalNature ?

15 views
Skip to first unread message

cyril giraudon

unread,
Feb 14, 2011, 7:37:12 AM2/14/11
to amele...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

In the context of /physicalModel/multiport definition, it happens multiport impedances depend on frequency.
I would like to constraint the definition of arraySet representing impedance :

- the first and second dim* would be "port" dimensions
- the third dim would be the frequency dimension.

In addition, I would like to insert the "port" physicalNature to make things really clear :
Here is an example :

/physicalModel/multiport/
|-- $imp[@type=impedance
|           @floatingType=arraySet]
`-- ds
    |-- dim1[@physicalNature=port]
    |-- dim2[@physicalNature=port]
    `-- dim3[@physicalNature=frequency]

What do you of this ?

Best regards,

Cyril.

Solange

unread,
Feb 15, 2011, 1:21:21 PM2/15/11
to Amelet-HDF

Solange

unread,
Feb 15, 2011, 1:28:52 PM2/15/11
to Amelet-HDF
Hello Cyril,
I am OK for this new physicalNature, It will be very clear for Z, Y or
S matrices for jonctions in CRIPTE.
Do you think that we can apply this physicalNature also for
transmissionLines matrices when depending on frequency (ZY matrices
and Zcgamma matrices), in those cases, we have also a data table with
values and ds/dim1,dim2 and dim3.
dim1 and dim2 for ports, dim3 for frequency values.....

Best regards,

Solange


On Feb 14, 1:37 pm, cyril giraudon <cyril.girau...@gmail.com> wrote:

cyril giraudon

unread,
Feb 17, 2011, 11:54:55 AM2/17/11
to amele...@googlegroups.com
In fact, in order to be general, I think electric potential point is really the concepts behind
junction port and transmission line wire, so I propose :
@physicalNature=electricPotentialPoint

Any idea ?

Cyril.

Solange

unread,
Feb 18, 2011, 8:03:51 AM2/18/11
to Amelet-HDF
Hello,
I discuss this new suggestion with Jean-Philippe.
And we think that @physicalNature=electricPotentialPoint will be a
good think.
We effectively can apply it to multiport models, transmissionLines
model (electrical parameters), but also to Thevenin generators or
Norton generators (values of voltage or current generator different on
each wire of the transmission line)

So we totally agree with you Cyril and your propostion
@physicalNature=electricPotentialPoint

Regards,
Solange

cyril giraudon

unread,
Feb 21, 2011, 1:25:21 PM2/21/11
to amele...@googlegroups.com
It 's ok for the next Amelet-HDF release.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages