We know that ambivalence is aversive and activates coping processes, especially when people need to make a choice. But is it possible that there is a basic process that works against holding ambivalent attitudes in the first place? Johannes Ullrich and
I have conducted a number of studies on the idea that when people form attitudes about novel ambivalent stimuli, the fact that a stimulus implies high gains reduces their expectation of losses relative to the true value (and vice versa). Such cross-valence
inhibition also emerged after actually experiencing the outcomes associated with the ambivalent stimuli.
To our knowledge, this mechanism is not reflected in current theorizing about ambivalence. We have published a preprint (
https://psyarxiv.com/7gnk2/) and would be happy to receive your feedback
(positive AND negative!!) before submitting this to a journal.
Best wishes,
Pierpaolo and Johannes