Universal Ambisonic v0.93
e deleflie
Attached is Universal Ambisonic version 0.93. I have reworded the
introduction to make the concept of 'round-trip' central to the
standard.
I've called it a standard, and not a specification .... I'm bad at
semantics ... can anyone say whether this is a good or bad idea?
I'm wondering if file implementations SHOULD have a metadata header
named "UniversalAmbisonic=1" (or some such thing). Because this means
that *.amb is not Universal Ambisonic compliant. But that said, it
would be better for the file to state specifically that the contents
are ambisonic ... so I'm not sure.
Attribution: ... I dont want to put other people's names on there,
because I know that some people who have contributed may not agree
with the whole thing. But at the same time, it doesn't feel right for
there just to be my name ... any ideas?
Etienne