Re: HEY SNIT STFU

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Snit

unread,
Sep 11, 2004, 1:14:53 AM9/11/04
to
"Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
fretwizz-8F6E48...@netnews.comcast.net on 9/10/04 12:32 PM:

> In article <chsmsi$e...@odbk17.prod.google.com>,
> "Snit" <CSMA...@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
>> "Elizabot v2.0.1" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in article
>> 4141d058$0$204$7586...@news.frii.net on 9/10/04 9:03 AM:
>>
>>> Rick G wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I assume that you properly specified your signature delimiter as
>> well.
>>>> Unfortunately the trailing space was removed from that line too.
>>>
>>> Yes, I did.
>>>
>>>> Final conclusion: Google Beta is unpredictable. It's much faster
>> than
>>>> the regular GG, but has 'unfriendly' characteristics. It doesn't
>> provide
>>>> the references: header, so any client which relies on that for
>> threading
>>>> is out of luck; it may or may not properly send the signature
>> delimiter.
>>>
>>> Yep. I did some test posts before posting here and they came out
>>> properly. Weird.
>>
>> Maybe I am able to control Google.... Steve has suggested that the
>> Google record is a part of my "Snit's delusions and disingenuous
>> bullshit"... if he is correct, then I am able to control Google to
make
>> it look like my claims were accurate...
>
> No, I'm suggesting that every word that comes off of your computer is
a
> part of "Snit's delusions and disingenuous bullshit"... and this here
is
> no different.

How could every word that comes off my computer be bullshit when I am
merely pointing you to your own words on Google.

Again, Steve, your delusions do not make me be able to control Google...

Snit

unread,
Sep 11, 2004, 1:15:42 AM9/11/04
to
"Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
fretwizz-E9A5B3...@netnews.comcast.net on 9/10/04 11:09 AM:

> In article <chsmp3$7...@odak26.prod.google.com>,
> "Snit" <CSMA...@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
>> "Rick G" <Ri...@dot.dot> wrote in article
>> Rick-B3372F.0...@news.telus.net on 9/10/04 9:41 AM:
>>
>>> In article <chskh7$o...@odah37.prod.google.com>,
>>> "Elizabot v2.0.1" <eliza...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's one with no quoted material.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> By responding to Elizabot v2.0.1 you implicitly agree to the TOS
at:
>>>> http://elizabot.spymac.net/
>>>
>>> Still nada.
>>>
>>> I think an apology may be in order here.
>>
>> Neither Steve nor Elizabot will ever accept responsibility for their
>> claims.
>
> You're a liar, plain and simple. I didn't accuse you of lying here,
> though it would not have surprised me if you had. IMO no apologies
are
> ever required by anyone that ever accuses you of lying for any
reason.
> You made this bed... go find your sister and sleep with her in it.
Wow... more trolling by Steve. What a shock.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages