AI will never

[Betty]

S3CRYPT:BEGIN:AESCTR:F1EF:OAEoeWzCg3peFVvCp8KfZsOtw4ghw4BUwpRJM8OGw6cOfsOnLW
wJXsOLWMO3OiPDn38bw6zDiU41YsODwpRyYcO7esOReFJxw6zD
rcOdFMOfGTfCgFElw4bCp3tXAMOswpzDhxIScC/DtR9UwpPDps
KXwoA5w7HCsyc/wo3CtMOAS2gJwqgiw68Ww5wNV8KuNm9cwqPD
iDEAX8KawqbCv0ENTcKuUEUXe8OrD8K5wpTCu0FTLEtlwr7Cqw
fCgMKIPMOkesKYw4gbU8OdwoPClwVqw4rDsMOCV2QFdx5YZ2jC
ssKow5XDjMOLMsKIa8OxAHhVwqYZw6nDkcOSYMO4DGLCvcO8Ez
FWw5Fdw5fCpsOtw4bCtyrDkMKudRrDqcKuB2QAa1sUU0nCrmnD
mBo1bkzCijhnRcKiIsKKw7VPPRDCmcKoCcOgwoYMbzBGw7/Cns
KvGMKkP3/CrHPDlcOIw6AbwoPCiVgUAcOew5fCgEfDr8OWw4rC
kcKvVMOxb8KPw6nCpMKld3cvwrJVwrvDjcOcT8Otwq3CgGYHw6
9Zwqt+JCFzbQ==:END

--
.

[FromTheRafters]

Betty explained on 3/24/2020 :

Yes, it seems they will always be limited in that respect. Some of the
"poetry" posters I have seen on city buses could have easily been
written by them.

[Betty]

Some Usenet posts too, though there doesn't seem to be any I associated
with the A.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

Betty wrote :

...and that missing I goes for the people too sometimes.

[Betty]

That's what I meant, I've been reading a particular group.

Something odd is going on with this thread. It has disappeared from my
Texas server. I saw your latest post pop up, but when I clicked it there
was nothing there. All three posts before that were in view, but
disappeared as soon as I clicked mine earlier. Now I see that my other
sig tag is back and I had stopped using it.
--
~!~

[Betty]

Betty wrote:
[...]

> Something odd is going on with this thread. It has disappeared from my
> Texas server. I saw your latest post pop up, but when I clicked it there
> was nothing there. All three posts before that were in view, but
> disappeared as soon as I clicked mine earlier. Now I see that my other
> sig tag is back and I had stopped using it.

Fixed it.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

It happens that Betty formulated :

I noticed a certain person is being called a troll and an idiot. Some
things never change.

[Betty]

It's jaw-dropping, leaves me speechless.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

Betty formulated the question :

Me too. The depth of their stupidity is unfathomable.

[Betty]

If we're talking about the same person, and I think we are, I am in
total agreement.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

Betty pretended :

I think we are in agreement then, if I'm thinking who you think I'm
thinking we're talking about.

[Betty]

[g] I'll have to interpret that, and I think I can, but I'll check a
dictionary for the meaning of 'thinking'.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

After serious thinking Betty wrote :

Yep, that's the one.

[Betty]

I thought so.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

Betty explained on 3/27/2020 :

So upset when I called the Somali pirates' kidknapping for ransom a
"Business Model" which should not be rewarded by payoffs, now it's just
supply and demand when someone practices buying out local supplies and
price gouging on necessary supplies during a crisis.

Still, that's not as bad as what the Republican Senators did.

[Betty]

I remember the pirate discussion, it went on for a long time. The latest
argument, concerning the price gouging, is one of those jaw-dropping
reads that makes you wonder what goes on in that mind. There was a lie
on another subject a few days ago. I've been looking for the post from
several years ago that told a different story. I think the person makes
stuff up to fit whatever impression they hope to convey at the moment,
trying to confuse the opponent. You know that if it had an impact on
them the story would be different, but not in agreement with the other
posters.

> Still, that's not as bad as what the Republican Senators did.

Do you mean the no conviction impeachment? It seems to me that the judge
should have insisted that witnesses be allowed to testify. The senators
should be held accountable for their predetermined acquittal.
--
.

[FromTheRafters]

That sounds just like the personality of our new King.

>> Still, that's not as bad as what the Republican Senators did.
>
> Do you mean the no conviction impeachment?

Yes!

> It seems to me that the judge
> should have insisted that witnesses be allowed to testify. The senators
> should be held accountable for their predetermined acquittal.

Yes! The stonewalling of the witnesses and the documents which were
found to have errors in form or date should have been allowed since
these were technical issues and not about content. The judge should
have (if allowed by law) made them sufficient on their face to be
admitted.

Aside from that, the Republican Senators should have voted to allow
them to be admitted. That they didn't, shows them to be unworthy of our
trust.

[Betty]

That's right.

>>> Still, that's not as bad as what the Republican Senators did.
>>
>> Do you mean the no conviction impeachment?
>
> Yes!
>
>> It seems to me that the judge should have insisted that witnesses be
>> allowed to testify. The senators should be held accountable for their
>> predetermined acquittal.
>
> Yes! The stonewalling of the witnesses and the documents which were
> found to have errors in form or date should have been allowed since
> these were technical issues and not about content. The judge should have
> (if allowed by law) made them sufficient on their face to be admitted.
>
> Aside from that, the Republican Senators should have voted to allow them
> to be admitted. That they didn't, shows them to be unworthy of our trust.

It's impossible to understand those people. The effects of their of
their actions, or non-actions, will surely have a negative impact on
them someday. It's impossible to understand the King's base and the way
they blindly support him.
--
.