Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Review: Memoir of 60's Zining & Buk's 1st publisher

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeff Potter

unread,
Oct 29, 2000, 7:21:12 PM10/29/00
to
[Uh....no one responded to my first posting of this under a more generic
subjectline, so here it is again with hopefully a better one. Ya know,
"The Buk" is kinda maybe a little bit popular amongst zinesters, and
here's the memoir of the NOLA Express, the zine that first published him
in a big way. It's also a memoir of an amazing time in underground
zining. Maybe it's something we can use to compare to our own scene
today. --JP]


OK, here's a review by Jack Saunders of the new book by Darlene Fife,

"Portraits From Memory: New Orleans in the Sixties."


**Golden Memories**

Brenda and I moved to New Orleans in the Fall of 1969 to attend graduate

school at Tulane University, in anthropology. I
remember the vendors selling NOLA Express in the French Quarter asking
you for 11¢ for a bottle of wine. Usually, you'd give
them more than 11¢. At least I would. I'd give them a dollar, which was
enough for a bottle of wine and a cup of coffee, then.
Fortified wine. Chicory coffee. It would also buy you a plate of red
beans and rice, or a po-boy sandwich.

The NOLA Express was where I first read the short stories and poems of
Charles Bukowski. I didn't know what to make of them.

I liked them. But were they literary? Were they an accident? Was
Bukowski a primitive writer? In the sense naïve? What I'd now
call a vernacular writer, by analogy with folk, or outsider art?

I didn't know. I didn't care. I liked his stuff.

I liked the cartoons of Patrick Kelly. Kelly's cartoons would later
grace the covers of Screed and Evil Genius, two of my books.

I didn't know Robert Head and Darlene Fife, but I knew who they were.
Later, they were the first underground writers I was to
meet. And Patrick's little magazine, Blue Horse, was the first little
magazine to print something I had written (a couple of recipes,
or poems, or anecdotes, from Raw Energy: A Cookbook for Action
Painters).

In fact, I'd sent my work to Bob and Darlene and Darlene had sent it on
to J. T. Bradley and Patrick. J. T. showed it to Patrick.

J. for Jacqueline.

So really, Darlene Fife and Jacqueline Bradley discovered me. If anyone
did.

(I was already being read by Larry and Hazel Schlueter, Jim and Cindy
Miller, and Dick Vajs. Shit, I don't have many more readers
than that now.)

One of the issues of NOLA Express that was an eye-opener, to me,
identified members of the board of regents, at Tulane, and
showed what other boards they served on. Interlocking directorates. The
movers and shakers who ran things, businesses, ran
newspapers, radio and television stations, and universities. Newspapers,

radio and television stations, and universities were
businesses. Businesses first, you might say. Then newspapers, radio and
television stations, and universities. If it didn't interfere too
much.

It reminded me of the old joke, "Stop the presses, Chief--I have a story

here that's going to break this town wide open!" "Who do
you think owns this newspaper, son?"

Or, an example, right in front of us, when the sportscaster on one of
the local TV outlets said something bad about the New Orleans
Saints, he was denied access to the locker room and not allowed on the
team plane. You can bet the sportscasters on the other
stations got the message of that.

A magazine, or paper, or media outlet is a trade press for whatever
industry it reports on, uncritically peddling the party line. That
includes the culture industry, and the knowledge industry. The arts and
higher education. An artist, or a scholar, who doesn't sing
the company fight song does not get a teaching job, or a fine arts
grant. If he has one, he loses it, and is blacklisted.

This was a hypothesis I tested, and confirmed, in my life. Not a theory.

A crank, or conspiracy theory. To conspire means to
breathe the same air, and the people breathing it can't imagine any
other air to breathe.

Sometimes, to see what's on the end of the fork, you have to eat with
chopsticks.

The business of business is culture. Is manipulating the culture,
managing the zeitgeist. Through the media, and higher education,
and by controlling what books are published, reviewed, and taught, what
artists are supported, enabled, rewarded. What artists are
put down, made an example of. Silenced.

Thank god for underground newspapers, small presses like the ones that
kept Bukowski going, independent bookstores, readers.
Hippie redneck freaks. Redneck hippie freaks with grandchildren,
free-school operators, the do-it-yourself ethic, health foods,
thrift-shop clothes, booze and dope and coffee, sex, jazz, folk music,
street theater, paintings, posters, costumes, back-to-nature,
hiking, tent-campers, bird-watchers.

It's like (1) that never happened, and (2) it's still alive, still going

strong, although you have to look for it, know where to look. The
old broke-dick dogs carrying the flame are getting a bit long in the
tooth, to mix a metaphor. Dispersed. Isolated, and alone. In
touch, through the mail. Over the Internet. Carrying the message.
Passing it on.

Where we came from is interesting, and an account like Darlene's
Portrait's From Memory: New Orleans in the Sixties brings
back memories for me. Familiar names.

I worked a salvage archeology job at the Old Capitol in Tallahassee with

Henry Baker.

Any port in a storm. Demolition laborer was better than being
eighty-sixed by state government as an information specialist for
filing a grievance when I got sacked, for writing on the job. This was
not long after I met Darlene and Bob.

He tells of being hassled by the fuzz in the Quarter, for wearing a
double-bitted axe on his belt.

Then he tells of being tried for obscenity, after the "What Kind of a
Man Reads Playboy" issue (WELCOME BAPTIST
CONVENTION), the prosecutor demanding of him, on the stand, "What gives
you the right to publish such filth," Bob taking out
the business card with the Bill of Rights on it which he gave to cops,
who wanted to know what gave him the right to wear an axe
in his belt, and reading, aloud, calmly, "Congress shall make no law
abridging freedom of speech, or of the press," the prosecutor
quailing before his recitation like a vampire quailing before the cross,

or a clove of garlic.

You want stories like that--and who doesn't?--read Darlene's memoir.

* * *

I wrote the above before I read the book. I read the book in a sitting,
the day it came. I got a couple of facts wrong.

Robert gave the cops copies of the Constitution. You could get a plate
of red beans and rice, bread and butter, and a glass of water
at Buster Holmes' restaurant for 30¢. And the NOLA Express combined the
personal and the political, the muckraking and the
avant-garde, literary, the alternative and the above-ground, straight,
hard-fact reporting in a way I had forgotten.

It wasn't an underground newspaper. The underground never is. Just as
the marginal, the fringe, is often in the main American
stream, down the road, and the mainstream is an ad for Hadacol,
tail-fins, the tight, white collar, and laff-track sitcoms mixed with
happy-talk news.

The underground is open, erect, and fully-exposed. It's the
establishment, power-structure organs that are secretive, furtive, and
clandestine, with their code words and memory holes and
conflict-of-interest judgments about what's beneath consideration,
what's
not fit to print, what's obscene, a threat to public decency, or order.

Hooray for people like Darlene and Bob, their friends, many of whom
aren't with us, anymore. May they rest in peace. They had
little enough of that while they were here.

Pretty good eulogy for them, Darlene's book.


More at....

http://thedailybugle.com/prize/oct21a.htm

--

Jeff Potter j...@outyourbackdoor.com
"Out Your Backdoor": Friendly Zine of Modern Folkways and Culture
Revival outyourbackdoor.com ... for a full line of alternative
outdoor culture books, bookstore & forum


phony lid

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 3:46:10 PM10/30/00
to
"Jeff Potter" <j...@glpbooks.com> wrote

> [Uh....no one responded to my first posting of this under a more generic
> subjectline, so here it is again with hopefully a better one.

Gee, and I thought that's what I did, though under another subject line
where censorship is debated and jealousy disguised as indifference would
render a comprehensive comment on the matter merely "pseudo machismo" or
"the whine of a spoiled child" ... so let me begin again... cause I still
can't fathom what this obsession with some "golden age" of literature is all
about and why are you shoving Jack Saunders down everybody's throats? Is it
because you are publishing him and all this crap about folk art and literary
journals from the 60s is just a clever way to market his work? Do you think
zinesters are going to want his books because he mentioned Bukowski or wrote
about NOLA Express, which you recklessly refer to as a "zine?"

Do you really think that the editors of NOLA, The Outsider, Open City or the
Evergreen Review would make comparisons between their efforts and today's
zines? I think not. Even today, the focus of literary journals/zines and the
content of most fanzines and per-zines are what separates the Small Press
from the Zine World. They just don't mix. And as sad as that may be, it's
just the way people are. It's about preference and taste. Lit zine editors
don't care what some high school kid has to go through or what some 20
something slacker rants about in between music reviews and vice versa. Jack
Saunders isn't going to change all this and your efforts to romanticize the
past are beginning to venture off into hucksterism.

Don't get me wrong, Jack's cool and all, but this rocking chair on a porch
mentality of late on this forum is really beginning to disgust me. I've said
it before and I say it again, you can live in the past or revel in the
present. I believe our contemporary literature IS in zines, which is why I
work so hard to create, promote and participate in them, but this
self-consciousness and need for historical context will get us nowhere.

Why did people read more in the 50s and 60s? Hmm, well, let's see... could
it possibly be that there wasn't much else to do before the prevalence of
television, cable movie channels, WWF wrestling, music videos, VCRs, the
internet, AOL chatrooms and all the other distractions that make "Our Time"
so goddamn wonderful?

Kelly

http://www.fyuocuk.com

Jeff Potter

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 4:15:32 PM10/30/00
to
Jack's work is related to Buk's.

The NOLA Express is related to zining.

Kelly's asserts that 1.) these things are all unrelated, and 2.) finding out
about roots and connections is a waste of time. Well, that just doesn't hold
much water to me.

I think that a look into the past of the NOLA Express is more interesting in
terms of zining than how many copies of a zine you should print if you want to
use offset printing.

Post to whatever threads you like. Give examples of what you're talking about.
What merit is being cranky?

0 new messages