Not dualistic

[dmc...@gmail.com]

Three Zen students came out of a Dharma talk.

"What did you think of Roshi's talk today?" one
of them asked. "When he talked about true and
false practice, I thought that was kind of
dualistic, wasn't it?"

"Ah," said the second, "but your even saying that
is dualistic itself, don't you see?"

"Look who's talking," said the third. "I'm glad
I'm not dualistic like you guys!"

[leonard]

I'll give you a better example.

This story is pointless, because it points at itself.
I'm glad I'm not dualistic like this story and case.

[Ned Ludd]

"leonard" <ma...@cgl-os.org> wrote in message
news:ezADd.5723$mo2.3...@news.xtra.co.nz...

In the 'Not-Two' are no separate things, yet all things
are included. The enlightened of all times and places
have all entered into this truth.

Dual or not-dual?

Ned

[dmc...@gmail.com]

> Dual or not-dual?

The 4 train from Manhattan.

[Ned Ludd]

<dmc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1105148747.2...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

>
>> Dual or not-dual?
>
> The 4 train from Manhattan.
>

That'll get you to the ballpark.

I'm sure there are a lot of people going to both games.

Traditions die slowly if at all.

Ned

[ZORRA]

Right, a wiener of less than 2 inches. Anything else, skeez?

[leonard]

your example is way better than mine.