Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
perineum click
5 views
Skip to first unread message
David Dalton
Jan 17, 2012, 10:45:38 PM1/17/12
to
Now I've said before that the perineum click is
distinct from a PC muscle contraction, though in
the early days of my perineum clicks I confused them
in my writing.
But really what I call a perineum click is a
contraction of my perineum area muscles accompanied
simultaneously by a moving together of my upper
thigh muscles. Without the thigh muscle movement
it is just a contraction, not a click.
And when I have my legs wide apart I get just
the contraction and no click. But with my
feet closer than a foot apart I get the click.
In the past I have used such clicks for divination
but I have now resolved to avoid that as much as
possible. Also I sometimes get spontaneous clicks
which in the past I have then divined (by further
clicks) what they mean. I have now resolved to
ignore these as much as possible. (I may still
check whether the clicks are associated with
the four components and if no then ignore them
and if yes proceed with a four component
activation sequence, only I would only do this
twice before starting to ignore the spontaneous
clicks completely.)
I updated my Salmon on the Thorns web page a little
a while ago but am leaving a tidying up of my
messages subpage and its subpages to the next edit.
--
David Dalton dal...@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/nf.html Newfoundland&Labrador Travel & Music
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"Here I go again...back into the flame" (Sarah McLachlan)
distinct from a PC muscle contraction, though in
the early days of my perineum clicks I confused them
in my writing.
But really what I call a perineum click is a
contraction of my perineum area muscles accompanied
simultaneously by a moving together of my upper
thigh muscles. Without the thigh muscle movement
it is just a contraction, not a click.
And when I have my legs wide apart I get just
the contraction and no click. But with my
feet closer than a foot apart I get the click.
In the past I have used such clicks for divination
but I have now resolved to avoid that as much as
possible. Also I sometimes get spontaneous clicks
which in the past I have then divined (by further
clicks) what they mean. I have now resolved to
ignore these as much as possible. (I may still
check whether the clicks are associated with
the four components and if no then ignore them
and if yes proceed with a four component
activation sequence, only I would only do this
twice before starting to ignore the spontaneous
clicks completely.)
I updated my Salmon on the Thorns web page a little
a while ago but am leaving a tidying up of my
messages subpage and its subpages to the next edit.
--
David Dalton dal...@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/nf.html Newfoundland&Labrador Travel & Music
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"Here I go again...back into the flame" (Sarah McLachlan)
David Dalton
Jan 18, 2012, 10:55:57 PM1/18/12
to
In article <dalton-59D41B....@news.eternal-september.org>,
About 5:05 p.m. Wednesday I got a spontaneous click
which I then divined (by further clicks) meant that
there was to be a compiling of the four components.
I then divined that the original click was from
Gaia (Mother Earth) and that Gaia would do the
compiling and that Gaia had backtime ability and
a very good and long memory so is qualified to do the
compilation. Once the compilation is done there
will be a judging, and then an activation. If
this proves false then I will go through it only
one more time before starting to completely ignore
all spontaneous clicks.
Does this mean that all clicks are from Gaia?
No, I haven't decided that yet, and I divine no.
which I then divined (by further clicks) meant that
there was to be a compiling of the four components.
I then divined that the original click was from
Gaia (Mother Earth) and that Gaia would do the
compiling and that Gaia had backtime ability and
a very good and long memory so is qualified to do the
compilation. Once the compilation is done there
will be a judging, and then an activation. If
this proves false then I will go through it only
one more time before starting to completely ignore
all spontaneous clicks.
Does this mean that all clicks are from Gaia?
No, I haven't decided that yet, and I divine no.
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Jan 19, 2012, 11:49:15 AM1/19/12
to
That would appear to be a massively profitable hypothesis for you to adopt.
--
FFF
Dirk
Full Spectrum Praxis : ZERO STATE : http://zerostate.net
1X2Willows
Jan 19, 2012, 2:14:04 PM1/19/12
to
Dan
David Dalton
Jan 19, 2012, 6:33:04 PM1/19/12
to
In article <9nqvrs...@mid.individual.net>,
If the current four components sequence and another one like
it prove to be fake I will start ignoring spontaneous
clicks completely. But in the meantime I'm not spending
a lot of time at them, and am getting fewer clicks than
a while ago, and I'm not believing them blindly but have
some degree of skepticism.
it prove to be fake I will start ignoring spontaneous
clicks completely. But in the meantime I'm not spending
a lot of time at them, and am getting fewer clicks than
a while ago, and I'm not believing them blindly but have
some degree of skepticism.
1X2Willows
Jan 19, 2012, 9:50:09 PM1/19/12
to
David Dalton wrote:
>
> If the current four components sequence and another one like
> it prove to be fake I will start ignoring spontaneous
> clicks completely. But in the meantime I'm not spending
> a lot of time at them, and am getting fewer clicks than
> a while ago, and I'm not believing them blindly but have
> some degree of skepticism.
Looks like the more you ignore those clicks, the more Dirk's
>
> If the current four components sequence and another one like
> it prove to be fake I will start ignoring spontaneous
> clicks completely. But in the meantime I'm not spending
> a lot of time at them, and am getting fewer clicks than
> a while ago, and I'm not believing them blindly but have
> some degree of skepticism.
advice gains leverage.
0 new messages