Kent's May-July 2003 Yah00 account
Greegor
May June July
2003 37 750 313
Did you post with any other identities at that time, Kent?
Greegor
KBW > Since I only used that spam block for the
KBW > three months you show, I can't. Of course,
KBW > you already KNOW this, but because you
KBW > are psychologically UNABLE to be honest
KBW > intentionally (unless you think it will
KBW > advance one or more of your lies), you won't state so.
G > Thank you.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/e85a73ca8285c19c?hl=en&dmode=source
KBW > Your admission, by the same standards you
KBW > DEMAND be held to others, that you lied is
KBW > accepted. Will you be man enough to explain
KBW > to the readers just why you LIED about my
KBW > using compu...@yahoo.com for years?
KBW > What was and is at the core of your motivation?
Kent, you DID use compuelf at yahoo.com for years!
But here we were talking about your yah00.com account...
May June July
2003 37 750 313
G > Did you post with any other identities at that time, Kent?
KBW > Answer the questions I asked, coward.
How many posting accounts do you maintain, Kent?
Greegor
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >KBW > Since I only used that spam block for the
> >KBW > three months you show, I can't. Of course,
> >KBW > you already KNOW this, but because you
> >KBW > are psychologically UNABLE to be honest
> >KBW > intentionally (unless you think it will
> >KBW > advance one or more of your lies), you won't state so.
>
> >G > Thank you.
>
> >KBW > Your admission, by the same standards you
> >KBW > DEMAND be held to others, that you lied is
> >KBW > accepted. Will you be man enough to explain
> >KBW > to the readers just why you LIED about my
> >KBW > using compu...@yahoo.com for years?
> >KBW > What was and is at the core of your motivation?
G > Kent, you DID use compuelf at yahoo.com for years!
KBW > Explain why you LIED, as PROVED above.
KBW > Or did you make a mistake?
G > But here we were talking about your yah00.com account...
> To the mentally stable, the use of a spam block is not a
> different account.
> Please let your shrink know that you think spam blocks equate to
> completely new and different accounts at your next session.
Is it true that you claimed you took a ten month
break from usenet because you developed type 2 diabetes?
What part of type 2 diabetes would keep
you from posting to usenet for 10 months?
Isn't it an amazing coincidence that was right
about the same time ""that other Kent Wills""
got pinched for burglarizing a garage?
LOL
Greegor
G > break from usenet because you developed type 2 diabetes?
KBW > I've never made such a claim.
The post sure looks like yours!
Gonna try claiming it wasn't your post?
Your absence from usenet for TEN MONTHS
after your Saturday August 9th 2003 post
is correct isn't it?
Can you find even one post of yours on
usenet during those TEN MONTHS?
Please explain how it's a mere coincidence that
that ""other Kent Wills"" was arrested for the
burglary of the Weiben family garage on Tuesday
August 12th...
Do you really have adult onset (type 2) diabetes, Kent?
Did you in August of 2003 or ten months later
when you returned from your absence?
Greegor
You' got some splainin to do!
Greegor
G > break from usenet because you developed type 2 diabetes?
KBW > I've never made such a claim.
G > The post sure looks like yours!
G > Gonna try claiming it wasn't your post?
Kent?
G > Your absence from usenet for TEN MONTHS
G > after your Saturday August 9th 2003 post
G > is correct isn't it?
G > Can you find even one post of yours on
G > usenet during those TEN MONTHS?
G > Please explain how it's a mere coincidence that
G > that ""other Kent Wills"" was arrested for the
G > burglary of the Weiben family garage on Tuesday
G > August 12th...
G > Do you really have adult onset (type 2) diabetes, Kent?
G > Did you in August of 2003 or ten months later
G > when you returned from your absence?
G > You' got some splainin to do!
KBW > Subject: Re: Greg states he has "some splainin' to do."
> I'm glad you are able to acknowledge that you need to explain
> just why you were and are so COMPELLED to lie. Your work with your
> shrink is showing fruit.
> Does your mental health care professional know that you believe
> my parents are dead AND alive, at the same time?
> Have you mentioned how you believe Lindsay and our children are
> fictional AND that Lin divorced me and took our son to Illinois, at
> the same time?
> Have you mentioned to your shrink how you believe all of these
> things, as well as others I've not mentioned, are 100% true and
> accurate, even though they contradict each other?
More of your stock deceptions and lies, Kent?
Where WERE you between Saturday August 9th 2003
and May of 2004, Kent?
Greegor
G > break from usenet because you developed type 2 diabetes?
KBW > I've never made such a claim.
G > The post sure looks like yours!
G > Gonna try claiming it wasn't your post?
G > Kent?
KBW > Asked and answered in another thread.
You said you never made such a claim.
The post where you made exactly that claim
sure looks like it was genuinely from you.
Apparently you are contradicting yourself again.
Why?
G > Did you in August of 2003 or ten months later
G > when you returned from your absence?
G > You' got some splainin to do!
Kent twisted that and posted with a subject title of:
Greg states he has "some splainin' to do." Maybe he'll splain why he's
so scared of questions.
Greegor
G > sure looks like it was genuinely from you.
KBW > The claim you dishonestly present was
KBW > not made by anyone. I note you ran
KBW > away from my challenge that you post
KBW > a link to the post you claim I sent.
You deleted your post and now you deny it,
but you forgot that others quoted it in responses.