Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Rittenhouse guilty in at least some jurors minds
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Randy Hopp
Nov 18, 2021, 2:12:34 PM11/18/21
to
On 18 Nov 2021, Matt Singer <out.o...@wyebur.con> posted some
news:NpwlJ.13177$g81....@fx19.iad:
> On 11/18/2021 9:27 AM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
>> news:sn5fjj$joc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>> On 11/18/21 12:30 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days. It it were as
>>>> "obvious" that he killed in self defense as the right-wingnuts
>>>> claim (they're lying about "obvious"), he would have been acquitted
>>>> by now. We all know this. He *hasn't* been acquitted. He might
>>>> still be, but he hasn't been. The prospect that he might be
>>>> convicted of some form of illegal homicide is heartening to all
>>>> right-thinking Americans. The objective facts in plain sight say
>>>> that Rittenhouse murdered to people and illegally shot a third.
>>>
>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days. It it were as
>>> "obvious" that he murdered *to* people as you left-wingnuts claim he
>>> would have been convicted by now.
>>
>> *WHAM*
>
> Not even close, scooter. You claim it's "obvious" that he shot in
> self defense, and I am instructing you that multiple jurors say you're
> wrong. You're wrong.
You don't even know what's in your own mind from moment-to-moment, Rudy.
Besides, if you "know" this for a fact, it means a juror is communicating
with someone outside the case and grounds for an immediate mistrial.
> I win.
Yes, you've won another dress-wearing trip to your favorite drive-up
restaurant.
news:NpwlJ.13177$g81....@fx19.iad:
> On 11/18/2021 9:27 AM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
>> news:sn5fjj$joc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>> On 11/18/21 12:30 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days. It it were as
>>>> "obvious" that he killed in self defense as the right-wingnuts
>>>> claim (they're lying about "obvious"), he would have been acquitted
>>>> by now. We all know this. He *hasn't* been acquitted. He might
>>>> still be, but he hasn't been. The prospect that he might be
>>>> convicted of some form of illegal homicide is heartening to all
>>>> right-thinking Americans. The objective facts in plain sight say
>>>> that Rittenhouse murdered to people and illegally shot a third.
>>>
>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days. It it were as
>>> "obvious" that he murdered *to* people as you left-wingnuts claim he
>>> would have been convicted by now.
>>
>> *WHAM*
>
> Not even close, scooter. You claim it's "obvious" that he shot in
> self defense, and I am instructing you that multiple jurors say you're
> wrong. You're wrong.
You don't even know what's in your own mind from moment-to-moment, Rudy.
Besides, if you "know" this for a fact, it means a juror is communicating
with someone outside the case and grounds for an immediate mistrial.
> I win.
Yes, you've won another dress-wearing trip to your favorite drive-up
restaurant.
Scout
Nov 18, 2021, 2:47:51 PM11/18/21
to
"Randy Hopp" <rand...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:XnsADE6720...@0.0.0.0...
> On 18 Nov 2021, Matt Singer <out.o...@wyebur.con> posted some
> news:NpwlJ.13177$g81....@fx19.iad:
>
>> On 11/18/2021 9:27 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
>>> news:sn5fjj$joc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 11/18/21 12:30 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days. It it were as
> news:NpwlJ.13177$g81....@fx19.iad:
>
>> On 11/18/2021 9:27 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
>>> news:sn5fjj$joc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 11/18/21 12:30 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> "obvious" that he killed in self defense as the right-wingnuts
>>>>> claim (they're lying about "obvious"), he would have been acquitted
>>>>> by now. We all know this. He *hasn't* been acquitted. He might
>>>>> claim (they're lying about "obvious"), he would have been acquitted
>>>>> still be, but he hasn't been. The prospect that he might be
>>>>> convicted of some form of illegal homicide is heartening to all
>>>>> right-thinking Americans. The objective facts in plain sight say
>>>>> convicted of some form of illegal homicide is heartening to all
>>>>> that Rittenhouse murdered to people and illegally shot a third.
>>>>
>>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days. It it were as
>>>>
>>>> "obvious" that he murdered *to* people as you left-wingnuts claim he
>>>> would have been convicted by now.
>>>
>>> *WHAM*
>>
>> Not even close, scooter. You claim it's "obvious" that he shot in
>> self defense, and I am instructing you that multiple jurors say you're
>> wrong. You're wrong.
>
> You don't even know what's in your own mind
*objection* Assumes facts not in evidence, specifically that Rudy has a
>>>> would have been convicted by now.
>>>
>>> *WHAM*
>>
>> Not even close, scooter. You claim it's "obvious" that he shot in
>> self defense, and I am instructing you that multiple jurors say you're
>> wrong. You're wrong.
>
> You don't even know what's in your own mind
mind.
0 new messages