marine corps Sacred Cow
JRVining
(LETTER I WROTE TO THE SECDEF MONTHS AGO)
8 May 1997
Dear Secretary Cohen,
I'm appalled that its reported that the marine corps is being cut by only 2,000
personnel when it frankly hasn't done "squat" for the last two decades while
the United States Army has done the lion's share of the building, peacekeeping,
fighting and the dying. I don't know who is advising you to grant a "sacred
cow" status for this organization, but 174,000 marines that gets you less than
3 tiny evacuation forces and less than 2-1/2 divisions for $9+ billion dollars
is a monumental waste of money. Don't let marine corps apologists TRY to divert
you from what's really important by statistical "tooth-to-tail" ratios; what's
really important is that both marine corps "tooth" and "tail" are really doing
next to nothing for the manpower and money being spent on them. That's the
brutal truth, and its time we stop believing what we want to believe about the
Corps and develop the moral courage to admit "the emperor has no clothes". The
USMC is a secretive society that closes ranks to perpetuate myths about itself
and its capabilities that the unitiated can easily fall prey to. Compare their
"gooblygook" and high-sounding talk to what the other services are actually
doing. The marine corps is no bargain if its doing little or nothing
significant in the real world. It doesn't take 174,000 men to "show the flag"
around the world or land a few troops on some beaches with tiny allied nation
marine corps.
Low-grade infantry: Note marines on yet another minor landing exercise/Public
Relations-cum photo-opportunity bunched together in slipshod camouflage making
it easier for an enemy to detect and wipe them out with a single burst of small
arms fire...
Its about time that this idle, always-waiting-for-
a-WWII-rehash-that'll-never-happen outfit be trimmed by 10,000-20,000 slots; we
do not need the myriad marine Commands, Training Squadrons, Silent Drill Teams,
Combat Development bureaucracies, logistical bases, security detachments, 2
recruit training depots, dozens of General and staff officers drawing per diem
at headquarters, marine corps an entire second naval air force with fighters,
attack jets, transport planes, helicopters and all of the pork-barrel
subsidiary organizations created by careerist marines for institutional
political clout/expansion. That the mc has become too big and cannot handle its
empire is proven by its horrendous fatal accident rates: the highest of all the
services! The smallest service, highest fatalities due to peace-time screw-ups?
That dog don't hunt.
KITSCH MONUMENT: low-brow, pretentious art
Silly displays like above are a waste of time, resources and do not win
wars....When NatArt Director, J.Carter Brown called it "Kitsch" trying to say
it was popular, the bronze statue worshipers led by Rep. Gerald Solomon R-NY
whined for a resignation! WAA! Do not bow to the mc thought-police or worship
the mc!
Keep fighting units, merge them into the U.S. Army so it can have both an
AIRBORNE and amphibious Corps for seamless AIRLAND battle with its "bugs worked
out" NOW before war starts, just like D-Day, June 6, 1944 where the U.S.
ARMY----not the marines--- led the largest AIRBORNE-amphibious invasion in
history to win the war in Europe against Hitler's Germany. The marines have
never fought a first-rate enemy in war; the Japanese in the Pacific were
primarily foot infantry, the Germans in WWI exhausted by the time we got there.
Only the U.S. Army has fought and defeated a first-rate combined arms (tanks,
armored personnel carriers, artillery, engineers etc.) power---Nazi Germany in
1942-45--we lose sight of this fact amidst marine revisionism and bluster.
... instead of a few WHEELED LAV armored cars that cannot roll over
rubble/broken glass depicted at the top or monstrously huge amphibious armored
vehicles (AAVs) with a quarter of a rifle company packed like sardines inside
subject to fiery death...
We are the only nation silly enough to make a forcible entry means that
actually requires a division's worth of troops into an entire seperate service
bureacracy with 174,000 men yet can't deliver us a Divisional-sized landing
force in a timely manner (it needs to be there in hours, not days, weeks,
months--war will be over before then)!!!! The bigger the mc grows, the less we
get. We can't afford a so-called sea based second land army that is actually
land-locked that parcels itself out in irrelevent penny packets that perform
minor, low-risk, showy, "pet" missions while the U.S. Army shoulders the
nation's land peacekeeping and war fighting burdens.
If 40,000 slots needs to be cut, each service should take a 10,000 man cut to
include the do-little marine corps. If the usmc wants to be treated like a
seperate service it needs to make the sacrifices of a seperate service or else
be absorbed into the U.S. Navy or Army completely which would cut billions of
dollars in overhead costs arising from bureacracies existing just for the sake
of the organization not war-fighting. Don't be taken in by spit-shines and
fancy uniforms worn by braggadocio espousing simpletons; who is actually doing
the work defending freedom around the world? Who are actually in these Third
World Country "hell holes" patching up villagers? Who's patrolling the mean
streets of Haiti and Bosnia? Who's doing the real world missions right now, not
sitting on a ship or shooting blanks at each other or polishing barracks floors
in the U.S.?
The U.S. Army is doing all these good deeds, not the mc.
Don't blame headquarters marine corps; they don't want to cut back on their
bureacracy for a force structure able to do anything but low-risk media
intensive evacuations and beach landings; almost a quarter of a million marines
yet unable to take a beachhead if anything more than an enemy Brigade is
defending it. Less than 3 foot-mobile, low-skill level quasi-light infantry
divisions out of 174,000 men at a cost of BILLIONS of dollars.
The marine corps has become an ego club for co-dependants not a true amphibious
warfare fighting organization. When was the last time a real amphibious
operation has been undertaken in time of war? Korea. Over 48 years ago, almost
5 decades, half a century. By splitting up what few ships we have to the "four
winds", we will not be able to mass enough combat power in time to effect any
kind of significant amphibious movement onto an enemy's flanks in a world that
moves by the speed of the air. Will it take us losing South Korea before we
realize we've squandered billions on a headquarters marine corps-led "black
hole"; an organization that has let true amphibious warfare disintegrate in
favor of ego-gratifying evacuations and beach landings? We had the 1975 debacle
on Koh Tang island where the marines led helicopters into a fiery ambush that
left over 30 Americans dead. We had unqualified for special operations marines
insist on flying Delta Force into Desert One that resulted in another fiery
disaster leaving 8 dead. Three years later marines were packed like sardines
into a headquarters building that was blown up by a truck bomb, 265+ more body
bags. After that it was decided to leave marines offshore where they would be
safe from the enemy and themselves and where they have stayed ever since. An
organization that constantly brags about its alleged superiority to all others
at the same time hides its serious errors and shuns constructive criticism, and
destroys the careers of those who try to right these wrongs is doomed to
disaster.
I think its high time that those that are doing the work get the credit and the
budgetary support; cut 10-20,000 land-locked leatherneck bureaucrats talking
"trash' here in hometown U.S.A. not a couple of U.S. Army divisions out there
in harm's way in sniper and artillery range securing the peace. Look at the
thousands of marines sitting here at Camp Pendleton, Camp Lejeune, 29 Palms,
Quantico, Little Creek while thousands of Army troops are thousands of miles
away making the world a better place. The 2d Infantry Division sitting under
artillery range of the greates concentration of guns ever assembled. The 1st
Armored Division and dozens of other U.S. Army units in Germany and Bosnia. The
numerous Special Forces units in forgotten, devastated countries. Look at the
facts, not jarhead bluster.
I'm sick of headquarters marine corps distortions; if we want to really reform
the DOD it starts by rewarding the "doers" not the 'showboats".
The next Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff?
General Sheehan may be an iconoclast, but he's still a marine Corps "wolf" in
joint service clothing. His real agenda is to further the marine corps at all
costs. Put a no-nonsense warfighter-not an infighter in there. Why not recall
General Gordon Sullivan back to active duty? Or a younger lead-by-example
General like MG David Grange who used to command Rangers? General Henry
Shelton, CINCUSSOCOM is a take-care-of-the-troops kind of leader who led the
invasion of Haiti superbly and would be a great Chairmen JCS and/or Chief of
Staff of the Army.
Editor's note: after this letter was submitted, General Shelton was named as
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff....
As an institution, the marine corps grows parochial bigots, not selfless
warriors in favor of national defense. Anyone who sings about heaven being
guarded by themselves is a seriously warped individual who has forgotten that
war is a necessary evil, not the catch-all-end-all reason for human existence.
As the dying General Sam Damon pleads at the end of Anton Myrer's epic novel,
Once an Eagle: "If you have to choose between being a good soldier and being a
good human being..... BE A GOOD HUMAN BEING..."
America first!
Michael Sparks---human being and patriot--FIRST---not some title some vain
organization has rendered to me on condition that I worship it----------
P.S. This is my opinion, yes..but I speak the truth. I don't care how popular
the usmc may be to some of the American public fueled by TV commercials and
Hollywood; popular myths are not reality. Treating the corps like some sort of
spoiled child is not justified by her performance in the nation's military
operations of the last 2 decades. We can ill afford to continue to waste
billions on this sacred cow. Cut the overhead, get rid of the smug elitist
bureacracies and we'll correct the wrong began in 1947 when we made a
battlefield entry means into a seperate service, so we can win wars again ala
1945.
COMMON MYTHS EXPOSED.......
Beirut: MARINE commander didn't listen to Intelligence reports, no knowledge of
the long history of middle east car bomb attacks, 265+ marines slaughtered....
Desert One: marines unqualified to fly special operations helicopters ram into
a C-130, killing 8 men...Making the U.S. look like jack asses....No hostages
rescued.....Semper Fi!
Koh Tang Island: marines land in broad daylight onto the beaches where they get
slaughtered by enemies dug-in with heavy machine guns...26 dead, no hostages
rescued....
Lance Corporal Jason Rother abandoned in the 29 Palms desert after an exercise;
his absence not noted for days, he dies trying to walk out, 8 miles away from
the nearest town. HQMC makes scapegoats of his entire chain-of-command instead
of reforming the institution and providing basic Survival, Evasion, Resistance,
Escape (SERE) skills to the individual marine to empower him to improvise,
adapt and overcome in event he gets seperated from his unit....Drill & Ceremony
and other showy nonsense (retirement cermonies, parades etc.) that max the mc
image are more important---"just don't get seperated from your unit!"(ie:---be
a dependant puppy).... hqmc should send a memo of this to all prospective enemy
push-overs slated for the next mc "evacuation". "Taking care of our own" means
if you embarass the mc, you will be sacrificed rather than admit that there are
SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS within the organization needing to be solved. Anything that
goes wrong: blame the individual marine or whoever is in charge. Many jarheads
are fond of saying: "There's always a 10% that doesn't deserve to be
marines----" etc. etc. ad nauseum: you call this LEADERSHIP????.
NOT.
Real Leadership SOLVES PROBLEMS, not makes scapegoats---Real LEADERS like an
Evans Carlson or Lawrence Chamberlain INSPIRE men who are so-called "losers"
and "rejects" and they together save the day for this nation at the critical
moments when victory or defeat is decided by a forgotten few, not the
ballyhooed proud.
"Cast the first stone"? The mc house is built on vanity and glass....Want some
more Marine screw-ups?
The source of these screw-ups is ARROGANCE. Some think a shiny boot or starched
uniform makes you a warrior proficient in modern tactics and aware of the
latest weapons..you are seriously misguided....
And..eager reader, I spent 9 years in the mc....Boot camp, Infantry Training
School, Officer Candidate School, The Basic School for officers, Infantry
Officer Course....to name a few and thats not mentioning U.S. Army
schools/experiences....
You'd note I advocate a mc-ARMY merger....or do you just react by your emotions
before appraising the situation....not good...
In Vietnam, such rashness led marines to chase VC/NVA into baited
traps.....THINK FIRST...The enemy's entire strategy was to bleed us and have us
leave via mounting public pressure at home...IT WORKED, DIDN'T IT?....there are
more ways to win wars than just battlefield "victories" and body counts. War is
not a sporting contest with a scoreboard. Its a conflict of wills--who's
will-ideas dominate.
Some want to quote the Bible..... how about: "Pride goeth before destruction,
and a haughty spirit before a fall" ????? The Few, The PROUD, The DAMNED BY THE
LORD, MARINES. Hey--There will not be any marines guarding the streets in
heaven, knucklehead--there will be no war....
The Gulf War?
The Army did the left flanking movement and fought the Republican Guard, not
the mc...headquarters marine corps wanted to assault fortified Kuwaiti beaches
and slaughter our young marines fresh from high school eager to earn
battlefield glory as they sit in air conditioned offices..all to further the
ego/budget share of the mc..fortunately wiser heads in the DOD
prevailed......the mc is no longer sent in first unless its an easy task or we
are desperate and have no other choice. This is the reality since Beirut in
1983 proved the mc force structure is not up to the challenges of an alert
opponent.
How about Panama?
The entire MC sitting on its butts while the U.S. ARMY AIRBORNE and RANGERS are
jumping in at 500 feet to take down Noriega.....if we had waited for the mc to
arrive by slow ships we'd have had heavy casualties from a dug-in, alerted
enemy...(Don't even try to cite a tiny detachment of marines on LAV armored
cars and security forces and their token involvement. Panama was an all Army
and Air Force war, brilliantly executed). Only a marine would try to re-invent
history to make it look like the mc won Panama and all the nation's wars...NOT!
They just selected an ARMY AIRBORNE GENERAL to be Chairman of the Joint Chiefs,
not marine iconoclast, General Sheehan....I'd say the Airborne commands greater
respect than the mc boys club for men...
I was once a narrow-minded marine robot..no...I thank God we have adults in my
formations...I remember being in a marine formation left on the drill field at
Camp Pendleton one day..we were told to wait by our NCO....hours
passed..........
......noone moved................it got dark..................no action...
FINALLY I grew tired of this stupidity and inquired in the building...we were
supposed to have checked in, and our NCO had left us...this kind of
no-initiative behavior will get you killed. Its stupid, not disdciplined. The
NCO went to the mall to get his girlfiend and got "sidetracked"....Semper Fi!
As usual, I had to square everyone else away, they were too timid and "afraid"
of being yelled at.....by a sergeant.....what would these men do under fire?
Get wiped out. You don't win wars by timid sheep.
Mediocrity via FORM superceding FUNCTION is a mc mirage and way of life.....A
writer said:
"The record speaks for itself........."
Yes, it does...if you actually read it, and not your propaganda, you'd see how
screwed up the mc is...I've also experienced it....The National Command
Authorities have determined that the mc cannot be trusted to do difficult,
sensitive missions inland; why they stay ashore so much these days after
Beirut. Army SF/ABN, infantry units are given long-term assignments requiring
maturity and restraint. Thats a fact.
"Go to ANY foreign country and say you're in the U.S. Army........."
...and that the AIRBORNE is coming to get them, they flee and surrender like
the leaders of Haiti did when they heard we were inbound from Fort
Bragg.....the leaders didn't budge from the marines off-shore.........When
America has Patratroopers inbound the bad guys know "the excrement has hit the
fan"...a puny battalion of marines off-shore is token "saber rattling" and they
know it....
"Tell them you are a marine, and they are in awe......." OF YOUR UNIFORMS...I
burned mine....I'd rather have a piece of field gear to do the job than a set
of dress blues..any woman overly impressed with a vain person who is ignorant
of war fighting is shallow and not likely to be a very good partner in
life.....
As for me, when I was a marine, I always thought the Airborne in their maroon
berets and jump boots looked better because they actually do something that
takes courage..jumping out of an airplane at 500 feet with combat equipment is
a lot harder than sitting on a helicopter bench seat and remembering not to
walk into the rotor blades....
"When the stuff hits the fan, you come screaming and running to the corps for
help....."
Negative..why should I want someone who can't land navigate? Or move by
bounding overwatch? Or do a leader's recon? Or do mission analysis? Who can
only move in bloated 13-man abortions? Who exercise crappy and non-existant
camouflage? Who are ignorant of the levels of war? Who is not trained to
THINK--to use initiative....?
POP QUIZ
Do you, the reader.... know what the Operational level of war is?
Strategic?
Tactical?
Technical?
What Maneuver warfare is?
How does it differ from Airland battle?
Whats a Sagger ATGM?
How does it differ from a Fagot AT4 ATGM?
What's the difference between a RPK and a RPD?
Which one is a belt-fed medium machine gun? Which is a light machine gun?
What is the benefit of a tripod-mounted Machine Gun over a bipod mounted MG?
If you have trouble answering these questions....you must be spending too much
time in the mirror admiring yourself in your dress blues and at the gym..I
suggest reading B.H. Liddell-Hart's STRATEGY and Jane's INFANTRY WEAPONS as a
start.
Wake up!!! marine!!! Your glass house is in fragments!!! Get some boots on or
your feet will get cut up!!!
P.S. When you are really ready for some professional "shop talk", read the
following.....
What I want is the marine corps to be under the control of tacticians not
bureaucrats at hqmc. A mc-Army merger would achieve this...I'm going to add the
following onto my letter to the SECDEF as a sidebar, you get to see it
first....
JUST A FEW BENEFITS OF A mc-ARMY MERGER
*Brigade-sized floats of significant size to actually secure a beachhead and
fight inland
* Armored, tracked Mobile Multiple Launch Rocket Systems so we are not
outgunned/outranged by enemy artillery
*Instead of filling our limited amphibious shipping up with road-bound
Unarmored, unarmed HMMWVs that can be turned into a flaming wreck by a mere
burst of small arms fire, we have dozens of digitized armored personnel
carriers and Bradley fighting vehicles to overwhelm enemies with operational
maneuver, not just seize a piece of terrain...
*Digitized M1A3 main battle tanks in significant numbers instead of vulnerable
to anything above small arms fire LAV armored cars
*AH-64 Apache Longbows and OH-58D Kiowa Warriors (eventually RAH-66 Comanche
"stealth") helicopters operating off amphibious ships and forward bases in
support of Amphibious/Airborne operational maneuver
*Airborne/Special Operations plans integrated into a seamless war-winning team
NOW in peacetime not ad hoc (at the last minute) by unified commands in time of
war
*Airborne training for MPF personnel to deploy and link up with pre-po ship
equipment without need of secure runways likely to be targeted by the enemy
fighting smart
*ALL marines (not just mc bureaucracy's favorites) able to freely attend all
U.S. Army schools and pick up warrior skills; Airborne, Air Assault, Mountain
warfare(we need one school not two), SERE, Combat Lifesaver (in every squad not
a just corpsman for every platoon), Ranger, Pathfinder, Expert Infantryman
Badge testing etc.---no more trash talk of the U.S. Army would ensue when they
find out that they are weak in individual initiative, land navigation,
camouflage, tactics, operational art, realization that "spit and polish"
emphasis is nonsense and a waste of time...
* The serving marine has a hell of a lot to gain by merging the mc into the
U.S. Army..the only thing he'd have to give up is the lurking
inferiority-superiority complex, he'd have to show any superiority by
demonstrated behavior. Eventually a realization would settle in that ground
combat is difficult and we had best reserve our anger for the enemies of
freedom.
*The Lifers at hqmc created ironically at THE BASIC SCHOOL by immature young
officers wanting to be treated as superior beings would no longer have a
"career" and a pet service to foist plans that expand budget share and build
personal empires. They would have to compete with a broader cross-section of
American military professionals, their nonsense would not go forward into
institutional plans unchallenged. Constructive criticism would be created for
the first time within the ranks of the usmc officer and enlisted corps.
ABOUT BOOK LEARNING...... Are you aware of what took place in the 1930s after
WWI? War is an art form, not a science. Human creativity is involved. War
theorists seeing the rise of mechanization (JFC Fuller, BH Liddell-Hart, Billy
Mitchell) warned about the future face of battle and tried to awaken their
countrymen at great personal cost. The bad guys listened, and over-ran Europe.
Guderian's Panzers took their writings and made them reality while the book
writers were ostracized in their country by the combat veterans with "more
experience". Experience in war in the past is NOT enough. The Poles, French and
British that got out-fought in 1940 were combat veterans.....they were
physically fit....but they lost, didn't they?
The same holds true for toay. War is not some sporting contest between equals.
There are many paths to victory and resting on old laurels and deceiving
ourselves is organizational suicide. While I was in the usmc the Maneuver
Warfare reform movement was fought bitterly by the ego-weenies who worship the
corps and subsequently are closed-minded. A small example;
We were sitting in a restaurant for lunch..marine LT (me), Civilian, and two
Captains in Q-town. The civilian asked about using sound to detect snipers on
the battlefield. The one Captain tore into him explaining how "he didn't know
what he was talking about", and that "if he had his field experience he'd know
such ideas are impractical" etc ad nauseum. Want to know something?
You can buy acoustical small arms detection systems NOW off-the-shelf--read
Jane's or click here! AAI Anti-sniper set I've seen them and they work. What an
asshole that Captain (is) was....This is the smug, arrogant attitude in the
corps I'm talking about.....We had a near accident during a night helicopter
insertion recently and Colonels write in to Gazette saying we should STOP
LANDING HELICOPTERS AT NIGHT! Believe it??? The O'Grady rescue came within a
missile of a flaming tragedy because marines can't (don't want to) fly at
night....
This isn't LEADERSHIP our young marines, or the nation deserves of its
tremendous investment it places....
Maybe now, you see where I'm coming from and see the urgent need to shake up
the corps and make it a part of a humbler, more objective, open-minded
whole....
AFTER-ACTION REVIEW:
Did you HATE this article on the marine corps? Click here to vote "thumbs-down"
SEMPER FI!!
Did you AGREE with this article on the marine corps? Click here to vote
"thumbs-up" AIRBORNE!!
This is where common sense and wisdom must prevail....
To return to PARATROOPER 2000 click on the M4 5.56mm Carbine with M203 40mm
Grenade launcher...
To return to 1st Tactical Studies Group (AIRBORNE) home pages click on the U.S.
Army Airborne wings...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Jobsonline.com
undefined
More...
[Close]
[Close]
undefined
Patrick T.
Well, lets see if I get a bounce, he, he, he.
You get to be my new "project" Don't you feel honored?
Perry
>http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/5265/sacredcow.htm
>
>(LETTER I WROTE TO THE SECDEF MONTHS AGO)
>
>8 May 1997
>
>Dear Secretary Cohen,
Like he read it. get real you're a nobody.
meport
size the Marine Corps is required to maintain. There is a statutory size
the Marine Corps has to be.
The Army, on the other hand, has no statutory size, and can be cut at the
discression of the Secretary of Defense, with the approval of Congress.
--
The person who usually gets the most benefit from a complex situation
is the person who put the least effort into the outcome.
JRVining <jrvi...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010517150822...@ng-md1.aol.com...
Charles G. White
> There is a statutory size the Marine Corps has to be.
> The Army, on the other hand, has no statutory size, and can be cut at the
> discression of the Secretary of Defense, with the approval of Congress.
Am I missing something here? If Congress created a statutory size, Congress
can just as easily uncreate a statutory size. If reduction of the Army
requires approval of Congress (which term by implication is subject to
presidential veto), I see little real difference, except perhaps a play on
words.
meport
the budgetary process. To reduce the size of the Marine Corps, the law has
to be proposed, debated in Committed, debated in the two chambers, and
signed into law by the President. On the other hand, the size of the Army
can be changed by budgetary decree, which is much easier a process.
--
The person who usually gets the most benefit from a complex situation
is the person who put the least effort into the outcome.
Charles G. White <whit...@amaonline.com> wrote in message
news:GG%M6.5$jG1...@newsfeed.slurp.net...
Charles G. White
bill, than to deal with an isolated enactment. You have it exactly
backwards on which is the more complex process.
"meport" <la...@javanet.com> wrote
meport
as for general legislation? You better take a course no civics. Most of
the "Rules" are waived for the budget debate to get the bills through. On
the other hand, all the "Rules" would apply for a bill to reduce the size of
the Marine Corps, including amending, filibustering, act.
--
The person who usually gets the most benefit from a complex situation
is the person who put the least effort into the outcome.
Charles G. White <whit...@amaonline.com> wrote in message
news:XVgN6.16053$iC1.5...@news6.giganews.com...
Charles G. White
process are the same
as for general legislation? You better take a course no civics. Most of
the "Rules" are waived for the budget debate to get the bills through. On
the other hand, all the "Rules" would apply for a bill to reduce the size of
the Marine Corps, including amending, filibustering, act.>>
Quite possibly, I have had a lot more study and experience in civics than
you may realize. Apparently you have a short memory of history, when there
have been major hangups on the budgetary proces -- to the point of bringing
government to a near halt. I even remember the days when the Federal
courthouses limited the hours of operation because of budget stand offs..
When an item is intertwined among the budget bills, it may get swept through
unnoticed (passage by silent default is what you are trying to suggest). On
the other hand, it may get boggled down with the whole budgetary process.
Or perhaps, someone may actually read the item that they frequently try to
sneak through. Believe it or not, someone actually reads that material
sometimes.
In summary, you suggestion that it is more difficult to change Marine Corp
numbers by specific acts as compared to changing Army numbers by silent
default buried in a budget bill, is pure B.S. Congress will do what it damn
well please -- subject only to presidential veto and voter replacement of
Congress.