PETTING TOADS AND KILLING CHICKENS
DGVREIMAN
PETTING TOADS AND KILLING CHICKENS
NO GANG YOU CANNOT READ MINDS -BOO HOO AND SNIFF SNIFF REBUTTAL
http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post:
I have better things to do than being forced to defend myself from the
malicious and fraudulent Nigel Brooks hate/smear/con gang attacks that
have surfaced recently due to me posting that Google had said the key
gang members were lying when they said that Google reinstated my long
erred, typo or ambiguous posts I had removed and the gang resurrected
from my waste basket.
There is something about third parties proving these gang members
liars that motivates them to trot out their typical threats, fraud and
false accusations.
As an example:
After I posted the following proof that Nigel Brooks had been caught
lying by Google, and Google's legal team had verified that fact, Mr.
Mac the Medic started posting his typical defamation and false
accusation "mind reading based" smear routines.
Here is what I posted in respect to Google, which contains nothing
but the truth and the facts: (Note a copy of an email I received from
Google's legal team is included - if you want more details about this
post all you need to do is email me, verify your identity and request
it.)
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
For some reason having yet another independent third party confirm
that Nigel Brooks had lied about this issue several times infuriated
the "Mac the Medic" poster. It appears that facts and truth has a
tendency to upset this "Mac the Medic" person when it comes to Mr.
Brooks or Mr. Rau. Gosh, could they be "working together" in some
manner? Do you think? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Can the Hate/Smear/Con gang members Read Minds?
I have noticed that if I have made a typo error, or said something
that could be taken out of context with a fraudulent "framed" forged
context and meaning, the Nigel Brooks hate/smear/con gang has found
that post via malicious intent searches, and they "frame distorted or
forged excerpts from it" often as a means of harassment, defamation
and general obloquy. Never mind most of these posts were removed from
the Google archive due to their previously discovered error and the
error or typos thereby remedied; this smear gang has found a way to
dig through my electronic wastebasket and retrieve "discarded and
known typo posts" and then resurrect them and re-post them and
fraudulently claim "via mind reading skills" they say something they
do not, or had an intent they did not have. (In some cases they had
to go to foreign language forums to find my long discarded posts -
convert them back to English, and then re-post them on USENET all the
while fraudulently claiming Google was doing this and not them).
Considering I and others have posted more than 40,000 posts under my
various accounts, no doubt the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang
could find a few errors, or waste basket discards they can then
fraudulently "frame" and distort and fraudulently use to facilitate
their fraud and smears - provided of course they claim they can read
minds and determine what the author of that post was thinking during
the time he wrote it -even if they did not even know the author at the
time of the post! WEEEEEOOOOOOOEEEOOOOO.
Of course this is what hate/smear/con gangs actually do! They claim
paranormal mind reading skills so they can then claim to know what
every author in the word was thinking. If not then how could they
defame an author when that author tells them their distorted and false
context, intent and meaning is nothing more than pure bullshit,
nonsense, conjecture and is completely fraudulent?
Note the Gang's Classic Smear Attacks are Similar
Please remember the Google legal team has reported to me via the
email I present in the above URL that contrary to the gang's fraud,
Google had nothing to do with retrieving my long discarded posts and
replacing those long discarded posts onto a USENET archive. That act
was completed by members of the Nigel Brooks hate and smear gang.
Ergo, each time anyone references any of these long discarded posts
what he is hiding is that it was he or a member of his smear gang
*that re-posted these long discarded posts on USENET and not me after
one of the gang member's *knowingly* dug them out my waste basket!*
The gang avoids mentioning this detail as they know anyone rational
would know that a discarded post did not contain the true intent of
the author, and it was discarded by the author due to some discovered
error, typo, or unintended misstatement. So the gang had to lie about
where these posts came from - and of course they blamed Google and
stated (see above) that Google replaced my discarded posts and
thereby agreed those posts should be resurrected. But when Google
wrote me back and proved the gang was lying - the smear, threaten and
discredit Doug Reiman campaign started to roll with a greater
intensity that normal. Simply put; the hate gang does not like it
when someone posts the truth about their fraud.
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
So lets go to the heart of this Mac the Medic's obvious instant
problem with credibility. First we will deal with his glaring
hypocrisy:
From: Mac <1. NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: Bogus 'Hero' dies...
Message-ID: <607fg5hh84tfron0v...@4ax.com>
References:
<199d8662-67f0-4aec...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
<7NadncDwsJJexprW...@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:56:38 -0800
Bytes: 5445
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.news-media:289246
alt.politics:5199759 alt.military.retired:461416 alt.military:459789
alt.war.vietnam:764896
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Bogus 'Hero' dies...
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:17:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>We can start with you apologizing for your fraud, cons and outright
>>lies that (1) I never went to Vietnam (2) I was never in combat (3)
>>that I never made SFC E-7 in Vietnam, and (4) that I ever claimed
>>that
>>I had a Purple Heart Medal
> ========================
Mac the Medic then replied with: (Note the post said nothing about Mac
the Medic and it was directed to Mr. Tom Rau's false accusations about
me. Yet Mac The Medic often responds for both Mr. Rau and Mr.
Brooks and other gang members - gosh do you think this is evidence
they are working together? Do you think?)
Mac the Medic said:
" I believe Mr. Rau has corrected himself that you had served in the
> military and also in Vietnam."
Hypocrisy obvious: Isn't it strange that Mac the Medic wants me to
accept corrections in posts made by his fellow gang members, but he
howls, screams and barks that "no corrections nor even a mention of a
correction" is allowed to be considered when it comes to any of my
past posts.
No doubt Mac the Medic has been caught red handed spewing his normal
hypocritical nonsense and child like whines. He, she or it
apparently wants us all to accept corrections in all posts except
mine, which of course proves he was and is lying about the true
context and meaning of many of my posts as he ignores and disputes all
corrections and statements of clarity or disambiguations I have posted
in rebuttal to his fraud.
Could it be that Mac the Medic has an agenda to use fraud, false
accusations and serial lying to defame me, while claiming only members
of his smear gang can correct or modify their previous posts with
corrections and/or explanations? You be the Judge.
Now that we established that Mac the Medic is a hypocrite in respect
to USENET post corrections, let us now move to an area that he must
feel strongly about - mind reading and soothing saying in general.
I hate to be the one to tell you this Mac the Medic, but you cannot
read minds. Your clairvoyance is absent of reality, and your constant
claims of soothsaying and mind reading in respect to my past posts is
something you need to address with your Doctor or perhaps even with
your lawyer since you claim these special powers to the degree you do.
Now please do not run off and cry just because you have been told you
cannot read minds. I know that truth must hurt you, but someone had
to tell you the truth eventually. I am sorry it had to be me. I
apologize if I have caused you any distress in any way with this post.
I assure you it is not my intent, only to reveal to you the truth and
rebut and defend myself from your false accusations.
I will in this very post prove irrefutably you cannot read minds
herein thereby know what an author was thinking, or if he made any
errors, typos or unintended misstatements in any of his posts or
publications. But before I do, I want you to stop and contemplate the
utter drooling stupidity of someone that constantly and repeatedly
claims he can use paranormal powers to read the minds of authors and
know when and if that author ever made a typo, error or unintended
misstatements, or even any ambiguities in any of his posts.
Think about your preposterous claims for a minute. I know when
others have finally stopped laughing at your idiotic claims about me
and others, repeated dozens of times as you normally do, they wonder
if anyone in the world would actually expect others to believe such
outrageous and preposterous fraud and false accusations such as you
spew forth about me at every opportunity? After they read examples of
your posts they just shake their heads in disbelief.
I know you must feel embarrassed and ashamed to learn that you DO NOT
have any mind reading skills Mac the Medic, but I suspect that you can
get over that delusion with some professional help. Or perhaps you
can just read the Doctors' mind and avoid paying him for his services?
Weeeeeeeooooooooo.
Here is the proof you cannot read minds Mac the Medic:
Here is a post from Feb 2003 that you dredged out of my waste basket
(a known erred or ambiguous post which was instantly remedied and
corrected by its archive removal) and then you claimed you "knew" the
true context and intent of the post even after you were told by the
author or dictator that your context was false and fraudulent. Yet
you continued with your claimed clairvoyance even after the author
repeatedly told you that you were wrong and you were using fraudulent
representations of the post for the purpose of defamation and fraud.
Apparently, you were claiming "mind reading" to know the true
context, intent and meaning of the post as there is no other way you
could really know anything different from what the author or dictator
told you repeatedly and you acknowledged.
Mind Reading Test
So as an experiment to prove your mind reading skills, let's test your
mind reading skills on this very post in which you claim to know more
about the mind set of the author than the author! (This is especially
interesting as Mac the Medic did not even know me or even know the
name of the poster, nor even the person in conversation, nor even
anything about me nor the author when this post was first conceived
and posted. So Mac the Medic's (and the other gang members that do
the same as this clown) mind reading skills are seemingly claimed
*for all persons in the world, even those unknown to them, for all
events in the past, including those that he or other gang members did
not even know at the time!* Weeeeeoooooweeeeoooo. Twilight zone).
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
terrorists.
Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
shot fired in anger in your life.
CHIP STATED:
> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are much
> more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
That, to me is cowardice.
"Doug Says:
I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
received a purple heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart card not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets. "
1. Please use your self-acclaimed mind reading skills to correctly
tell us who actually wrote and posted that post? Name please. This
first test should be easy for a real Swami.
No? Cannot answer? Your mind reading skills are nonexistent aren't
they Mr. Mac the Medic - sniff - time for you to face that hard
fact - and BTW, there is no Santa Claus nor Tooth Fairy either - I
know it hurts, but someone had to tell you the truth.
2. Please use your self-acclaimed mind reading skills to name the
intended context of the above post. Use your mind reading skills and
tell us how the context was developed in the mind of the poster.
(This should be easy for a soothsayer-perhaps you should kill some
chickens first? Perhaps consult some Cobra snakes - or stroke a
gaggle of toads and sniff your fingers?)
3. Please use your self-acclaimed mind reading skills to correctly
tell us whether there any mistakes or typos or errors or unintended
conveyances in the above post? And if there were, please name them,
and the thought process or absence of thought process that the author
was using when he made those mistakes.
4. Please use your self-acclaimed mind reading skills to correctly
tell us the mind set and intent of the author when he or she wrote and
posted the above post. And if the context you are claiming exists in
the above post that you have determined through your "mind reading"
(probably right after you petted those Toads) contradicts the context
of dozens of other posts by the same author or the dictator of the
post.
5. Please use your self-acclaimed mind reading skills to correctly
tell us why your mind reading induced stated context of the above
posts directly contradicts several other posts from the same account
but the stated context by me and the actual author does not contradict
the context of any of the other said posts?
6. Please use your self-acclaimed mind reading skills to tell us the
meaning of a sentence in the above post excerpt that states: "I can't
imagine where you got yours since you have never fought in a war."
Obviously, the author was referencing something that was awarded NOT
in a war, if you disagree please tell us via your mind reading skills
what the author was thinking at the time, and which Chicken or Toad
provided you with your "revelations" in this regard?
7. Add the above sentence "I can't imagine where you got yours since
you have never fought in a war" to the final sentence that states:
BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart card not received in combat is
about as cowardly as it gets. " So according to your "self acclaimed
mind reading skills" what item or context could the author be talking
about that HAD to be awarded NOT during a war and NOT during combat?
Could the item or context be a purple heart medal? No of course not,
as we all know those medals must be awarded exclusively during war
and combat. The *only* possible context or referenced item in the
above post could be the VA Issued purple heart cards that were clearly
the stated topic of the reference and were verified the topic and
context in a subsequent post involving the same Chip person withing 90
days of the post above.
Nevertheless, if your self acclaimed soothsaying, chicken entrails
reading, toad petting mind reading skills say otherwise, simply answer
the rest of the questions posed above to prove you actually possess
those super and paranormal mind reading skills you claim you have. . .
Please note that your failure to prove your mind reading skills is
tantamount to a confession that you have been fraudulently and
maliciously misrepresenting the context, intent, errors, typos and
unintended misstatements of any author that you have defamed with your
false context interpretations and with your "quip frames" which
clearly do not mean what you say they do. Proved mind reading skills
not withstanding of course.
I believe Mac the Medic's mind reading skills are akin to his Toad
petting skills - zip nada.
Mr. Mac the Medic, IF you can read minds like you claim, you could
answer all of the above questions correctly, and of course these same
questions will be presented to you (and many more that are even more
revealing of your pathetic and false mind reading mantra and hype) in
a court of law, or to any independent third party you wish to choose.
Bottom line: Mac, I hate to break this news to you but you cannot
read minds. Giggle, scoff-
You cannot possibly know if, when or how any author of *any* post
composed his post, or what he was thinking at the time, nor his
intent, nor whether he made any errors, typos or unintended
misstatements, and/or ambiguities in his posts.
These are things only the author could now, and your repeated
professing to know these things even better than the author's
themselves, via reading the minds of people you had never even known
about before when the posts were first posted is not only the most
ridiculous, idiotic and child like claim I have ever heard - it is so
nutty it borders on the crackpot delusions of someone that is in
serious need of help.
Of course if you are not using mind reading, and you are using some
other magical method of knowing things that you could not possibly
know, then please inform us here and now how you are obtaining the
information you claim you have, and then I will test you on your
"magic abilities" in the next post. Er, do you have a broom you use
Mr. Mac the Medic?
Now please don't cry, pee your panties, or run to Muslim Mosques to
spread more mind reading fraud about me, and/or hide in a corner.
Someone grown up had to tell you that your embarrassing, goofy,
preposterous, idiotic and loony mind reading conclusions and claims
you repeatedly post about my past posts are preposterous, stupid and
so child like one must wonder if you made it through the 6th grade,
or you are so delusional you need to seek serious help from someone.
Sorry Mac, but someone had to tell you the truth.
Also, please answer whether you have ever been fired from any job due
to your unauthorized accessing of private medal records? I hope not,
as doing so would be an example of someone so deranged, unethical and
fraudulent it would add even more disgust to the amount I feel for
your "mind reading" hype and bull.
I doubt if there is much more for me to say about Mac the Medic's
tirades and obloquy he is posting about me and about some of my long
discarded past corrected posts. He is clearly a hypocrite - and his
self-acclaimed mind reading claims can be considered nothing more
than capricious, delusional and aboulic.
Add the fact that so-far Mac the Medic (while using several different
web names) has posted thousands of vitriolic and false accusation
posts about me based upon his self-acclaimed mind reading skills, and
sent same to several different third parties, and boasted on USENET
that he has contacted the following entities about me with his "mind
reading" context and intent fraud and false accusations:
The Governor of WA. The Attorney General of WA. The FBI (several
times) Dozens of Veteran's Groups. Something called "Stolen Valor."
Multiple TV stations and Newspapers. The Clark County Sheriff's
office. The Clark County District Attorney (where he filed completely
bogus criminal charges against me which the DA threw out - imagine
using a DA's office to facilitate his smear campaigns). He also sent
complaints to my servers with fraudulent child porno charges. He
posted false charges that Homeland security had confiscated my
computers. Oh, also included in his boasted contacts were Muslim
Mosques and several different religious organizations, plus a host of
other attacks, defamation, libel and invasions of my privacy and
utterly false statements about me - all because he is desperate to
stop me posting my rebuttals to his and the Nigel Brooks gang's "mind
reading" utter fraud, false accusations and obloquy. (It is clear
that when Mac the Medic wants to lie and smear someone he wants that
person to stay smeared and not dare to defend himself and rebut Mac's
false accusations, general obloquy and harassment with truthful
rebuttals).
Add his clear hypocrisy evidenced above that he wants me to accept
post corrections from everyone else but I am not allowed to correct
anything.
Add some other information that has surfaced from outside sources in
respect to Mr. Mac the Medic in regards to my personal and private
information.
Add my belief that he has often self-described himself as a "Troll"
while using that term in a different web name.
His preposterous and obviously bogus mind reading nutty claims and
all the rest of his suspect antics and malicious attacks has
convinced me that perhaps (I cannot know for sure as I am not a
Doctor) but just perhaps Mac the Medic's cheese has slipped
completely off his cracker.
I have posted thousands of times in my post disclaimer (see above)
that if you want to know the true context, intent or information about
anything I have written, email me and ask. I will respond. If you
want to know the truth ask the source, anything else is clearly pure
conjecture, speculation, and of course represents bogus "mind
reading."
Doug Grant (Tm)
Mac the Other
"DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:GaadnQQwZ7wa3KPW...@giganews.com...
have against a mosque? I doubt you've ever known anyone (the newspapers
don't count as 'knowing' shit from shinola) that's been in a mosque. I've
known a number of folks who visit mosques for religious purposes. Damned
sight better men than you....
....and what DO you have against pet frogs and fried chicken?
Mac
wrote:
>http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
==========================
No proof.
No evidence.
No documentation.
Simply the typical Doug Grant screed spewing forth his desperate words
trying to claim his opinion is fact.
-Mac, the Medic
P.S.
Stop petting those toads and killing those chickens....
Mac
>He also sent complaints to my servers
> with fraudulent child porno charges. He posted false charges that
> Homeland security had confiscated my computers.
====================================
Your fantasy is NOT reality.
Considering you have made the above statements, provide proof.
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
wrote:
So lets go to the heart of this Mac the Medic's obvious instant
problem with credibility. First we will deal with his glaring
hypocrisy:
>On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
=================
Given your posting history, and the claims you have made which
strongly appear to be adverse to reality, I doubt that you are able to
tell anyone the TRUTH.
Your original post, back in 2001, was, as follows:
DOUG GRANT and O.C.S. ---�ButterBars�...
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22�pm
Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. �I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I
went to OCS and returned as a Butter Bar myself. �Half of my
graduating class in OCS Ft. Benning ended up dead or wounded.
Doug Grant (Tm)
===================
The SUBJECT, the DATE, the NewsGroups are included that anyone may
check what you stated.
For some time afterward, when you were challenged about that
statement, you kept insisting you had that PURPLE HEART.
Then, some time after that, you desperately tried to claim that you
had referred to the VA card which had the inverted Violet Triangle,
which you called the Purple Heart CARD.
HOWEVER, Chip had referred to a CAR....
You, being in the military for those fifteen years or so ((not the
thirty you claimed)) would know what the CAR was??
Let's see how YOU ALSO, when challenged, desperately tried to claim
that a ButterBar was a NCO....
Sometime later you tried the excuse that you were talkiing about the
"Purple Heart Card"
You changed your excuse. Time and again. Seeking something that just
might pass muster with the veterans.
"Doug Says:
>I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
>real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
>never fought in a war.
And, now, here is a QUESTION FOR YOU - - -
You seem to have not been able to publish the DATE and the HEADERS of
the above little snippet.
Considering you made that first statement back in 2001 and continued
with that story for quite some time even in the face of several of the
challenges ----EXACTLY WHEN DID YOU SUBMIT THE ABOVE TO GOOGLE??
-Mac, the Medic