NIGEL BROOKS REP CON -REBUTTAL
DGVREIMAN
NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
For all those that are ethical, believe in the truth, and is NOT a
member of a hate/smear and con gang like the Nigel N. Brooks
hate/smear and con gang, I sincerely wish you and yours a very Merry
Christmas, and further, sincerely wish you and yours a long, healthy
and prosperous life.
However, for the hate and con gang members, who regularly operate in a
tyrannical, cowardly and in a mob hate manner to smear and defame
veterans, I hereby provide the following rebuttal to their recent
fraud, false accusations and general cons - which have now been
provided to several different legal venues:
Please understand I am forced to post my rebuttals to the
hate/smear/con gang that operates under the tutelage and direction of
Mr. Nigel N. Brooks. As long as Nigel Brooks and gang's et al
hate/con and smear web sites and groups operate (which are clearly
designed and updated regularly to smear me with fraud, forgeries,
false accusations and general obloquy) I will be forced to defend
myself with the truth - as this and my past rebuttals clearly and
irrefutably provide.
Nigel Brooks Served
By this time Mr. Nigel N. Brooks and some of his gang members have
been contacted by the legal departments from Google and Lycos asking
them for sworn certification in respect to their rampant and flagrant
copyright violations on their "Get Doug" web sites and Google groups
(Federal court has ruled that "Fair Use" does not apply if a pattern
of spite and defamation is connected to the copyright violations).
Ergo, Mr. Brooks already knows the name of my law firm, the law
enforcement people that are already involved, and he has by now read
my law firm's letter to the US Attorney, and to various Federal law
enforcement entities. I am waiting for Brooks and his gang members
sworn statement replies that must be sent back to the Google and Lycos
agents, and of course I invite the hate/smear gang members to make
and issue statements to my lawyer, the US Attorney, law enforcement,
Google and Lycos about this issue. In fact, I and others *cannot
wait* to see their statements under oath!
Also note that after completing an extensive and comprehensive
investigation of the facts, including reviewing hundreds of posts from
the said hate gang, and my rebuttals, my lawyers have written to the
US Attorney and provided her with their conclusions and
recommendations, along with hundreds of exhibits supporting said
conclusions. Moreover, my law firm has further contacted several
Federal Investigators over some of the issues mentioned herein, and I
have, based upon advice of my counsel, personally contacted the FBI
in Portland, Or, and in Vancouver, Wa. I have been advised by the
FBI to file an official complaint with the FBI, and file a complaint
with the Oregon Police. I have also filed a complaint with the Clark
County Sheriff's office, and I am preparing other complaints for other
states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.
I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and
it is ready to go as soon as Nigel N. Brooks (and/or some of his key
gang members) respond under an oath to the official legal complaints
and to the official complaints filed with Google and Lycos.
It appears, one way or another, this issue is going to the courts.
(Probably several courts considering I have been advised to file
several complaints in several different states). (If Mr. Brooks
refuses to provide you with any of the information mentioned above,
then email me directly at legal...@comcast.net with your request,
and once your email and real name have been verified, then I will
provide all information mentioned above. Please understand that
anything you say in statements in regards to these issues can and
will be used against you in a court of law). Note further that you
will retain a copy of your email, so any whines and excuses from Nigel
Brooks or members of his smear gang to NOT ask me directly to reveal
the information I am offering herein are nothing more than a
desperate attempt to keep you in the dark about the truth of this
issue. Of course they do NOT WANT you to contact me and read my law
firm's letters, for doing so would provide evidence they are the liars
and frauds I know them to be.
If you believe my actions are Draconian, then I must ask what would
you do if someone lied and posted that you were a pedophile, dealt in
child porno, broke into your medical records and posted some of them
on USENET, used fraud and forged FBI reports to defame you, lied
profusely about your military service (such as claiming I was never in
combat) and posted thousands of lies stating that I claimed I received
a Purple Heart medal, which of course I never said? Not to mention
the filing of false criminal charges against you and experiencing the
direction, tutelage and incitement from Nigel N. Brooks to his
smear/hate and con gang members to continue with such fraud and abuse
of process with similar acts?
I suspect anyone that was subjected to such fraud and con man false
accusations for as long as I have would be forced to do the same as I
have, and will. And you can bet I have just started to defend myself.
(If Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members deny any of the statements
I have provided herein, then once again, please email me directly,
confirm your identity, and I will refer you to the letter from my law
firm to the US Attorney and to various Federal Investigators).
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case.
You would think these pathetic souls and cowards would find
something to do other than spread their fraud, hate and smears about
people they have targeted for their obloquy, but alas, it appears to
me their malicious bullying and perpetual hate and frauds have become
their "pathetic life."
I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.
Nigel Brooks Hiding From Independent Legal Analysis
I have repeatedly offered Nigel N. Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang
members the opportunity to take their hate, false accusations and
fraud to (1) the American Association of Arbitrators, loser pays, and
if that independent legal entity frightened them I even offered them
the opportunity to (2) pick any University they choose (that has a
law school) and they can submit their rants and fraud to that
University, and I will provide my rebuttals, and if the University
says I am lying I pay for everything, but if the University says the
con men are lying, THEY pay for the independent analysis.
Once again the cowards that compose the Nigel N. Brooks hate/smear and
con gang pissed their panties and ran for cover in respect to my
offers of an independent legal analysis of their outrageous, unethical
and malicious false accusations.
I also offered Nigel N. Brooks an opportunity to even NAME a single
document he claims exists in those military records he received via
his FOIA request about me that proves ANY of Nigel Brooks or any of
his hate gang's smears or statements they have posted about me . . .
once again we see Nigel N. Brooks and his smear gang hide, cower, and
pee their panties over this simple means to prove to the readers the
volumes of cons and fraud Nigel Brooks and his smear gang have been
posting about me and others on this forum.
You must always remember that hate mongers and con men are true
cowards - and that is one reason why I have been forced to bring this
issue into a public legal arena.
Web Sites for Hate and Profit
Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
maintain web sites and a Google Newsgroup designed specifically to
defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of
course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals. Also note that Nigel Brooks and/or members of his hate
gang make a profit and/or gain value from selling advertising on
those said hate and fraud sites.
Once again, I have offered Nigel Brooks dozens of times (and/or any
of his con/hate/smear gang members) the opportunity to take their
fraud and false accusations to the American Association of
Arbitrators, or to any legal department of any University they select,
and if either of those entities agrees with Nigel Brooks in respect to
his accusations about me, I will pay for their services. HOWEVER, if
those legal experts agree that my rebuttals are correct and accurate,
then Nigel Brooks and/or his smear/hate/con gang members pay for the
independent legal analysis.
Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
panties, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts . . . and the reason they hide from such independent
analysis is obvious to me - they know they are lying.
Disclaimer Continues
Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.
My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.
Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, nonfiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.
The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).
And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.
http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.
Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.
http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.
Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.
Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*
I said as the following URL clearly proves:
1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statements about this issue:
"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).
Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?
Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."
When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:
http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009
"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says > nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating
> method. The post
> stands by itself."
Nigel Brooks"
Fiction and Sarcasm - Brooks and gang style.
I must conclude (based upon the above statements from Nigel Brooks
that all posts "stand by themselves") that Nigel Brooks is
proclaiming and confirming that all the times he claimed he was using
fiction or sarcasm in his posts he was lying because he did not
specifically state he was using fiction or sarcasm in such posts. If
*all* posts stand as written like Nigel Brooks claims, and can never
be explained nor the true intent and context provided by the author
when asked, then I must assume the same rules apply to all posts
published by Nigel Brooks and his gang.
See how completely idiotic Nigel Brooks claims about my posts really
are?
We all know, the WORLD knows, that when Fiction is used in any article
or prose it is NEVER identified as Fiction! Mark Twain even said
that Fiction has to be more believable than nonfiction or it loses its
effectiveness! According to the fantastic howls of Nigel Brooks,
each time an author uses Fiction or Sarcasm to embellish or add
interest to a story, he must immediately inform the reader in that
same article he is using Fiction or Sarcasm! This fantastic claim by
Nigel Brooks is about the most ridiculous, idiotic statement I have
ever heard in respect to an author's use of Fiction and Sarcasm, and
it directly contradicts ALL authors, prose instruction, and journalism
101 in every University in the World!
So once again we have another Nigel Brooks arrogant first, now he is
claiming he knows more about writing Fiction than Mark Twain and all
Universities in the world!
I cannot decide if Nigel Brooks is arrogantly stupid, or just
arrogant? Or perhaps both? I will leave that decision up to the
readers.
http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.
I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.
When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively nonfiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.
SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!
Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."
These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).
As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.
It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:
"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"
Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?
If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Question:
If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?
Lawyers Speak "again"
All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
When Nigel Brooks wrote that some of my causes of action were false in
respect to my John Doe lawsuit that is still pending to be re-filed, I
asked him which specific causes of actions were the ones he claimed
were false?
Another poster then added the following:
"He's asking for a list of falsehoods in his lawsuit?"
Nigel Brooks then replied on October 14, 2009:
"Bloody hell - I don't have the time to detail each and every
falsehood and
mischaracterization - but here's just one of them.
a. At page 20 of the 64 page Complaint he claimed that:
"Until the publication and continuing re-publication of the obloquy
and
defamatory material by Defendants, Plaintiff enjoyed a good reputation
for
honesty, uprightness of character, competence and truthfulness"
Nigel Brooks"
Doug's Rebuttal:
Nigel Brooks has found the time to post or incite more than eight
thousand (8000) defaming, serial lying and false accusing posts on
USENET about me, contact or incite others to file false criminal
accusations against me, contact or incite others to file false light
defamation about me with various third parties, and to generally
operate, run, control and direct one of the most malicious, hateful,
egregious, unethical and fraudulent smear campaigns on the Internet -
yet now he claims he "does not have the time to provide any evidence
to back up his false claim that any of my causes of action!"
What preposterous bullshit from this serial liar and fraud merchant.
Fact1: Brooks knows that he cannot claim any of my causes of action in
my John Doe lawsuit are false because he knows I can and will prove
every one of them - and more have been added since.
Fact2: Nigel Brooks fraudulent statements about my reputation above
also warrants some very interesting background information:
I have seen several repeated quotations from Nigel Brooks involving a
person that once was associated with my schools. Brooks and his
gang members quotes him often to defame me - but here is what Brooks
and gang are hiding about the person they like to quote:
Normally you would need to wait for my book to learn the following -
but without the detail I can produce, here is a general outline of
the people Brooks has been quoting and has obviously consulted about
me:
Note that by written agreement my students and my team members agreed
to allow clandestine surveillance of their actions in a casino, and in
respect to my teams, also agreed to undertake polygraphs, searches,
and clandestine videos of their actions by our security teams.
The person Brooks and some of his gang members have quoted often about
me was removed from my Blackjack team due to stealing money from that
team. After he was removed he clandestinely contacted some of my
former students without my knowledge nor permission, (he had stolen
one of our student lists) and against my specific written directions
to not do so, and against his written agreement with my school not to
do so without my permission and involvement, he and his partner in
crime secretly formed his own team with my former student's money.
When this traitor's team's money started to disappear, one of my
former students called me and told me what was going on. It appears
that each time this person Brooks seems to like to quote and his chum
would play with their team money they would lose...yet the rest of the
team were of course winning.
(Note that during my entire career with poker and blackjack I *never*
*not once* ever fielded or constructed a playing team that lost
money - and I have hundreds of testimonials to prove that fact and
will produce them in discovery or in court). (Also note the recent
movie "21" about a team of Blackjack players is a "joke" compared to
the amounts my teams won and the sizes of some of my teams - but that
is another issue that soon will be brought to the fore).
Once I was notified by one of the rogue team members about a possible
theft of my former students money, I called our security (who operated
in secret and was not known by anyone associated with our team or
schools) and asked them to watch and secretly video this person and
his partner the next time they played with the rogue team's money.
The evidence we received from our security team proved irrefutably
this person and his partner were stealing money from their own team!
And if this was not enough, once I started talking to the other
members of the team this person had illegally constructed I also found
out that this person's partner had been selling *the same defective
illegal computer* to several members of the rogue team, all for about
$5000 each! He designed the illegal computer it so that it would
break down, and when it was returned to him for repair, he would
simply make a tiny adjustment, tell the person that returned it he was
"waiting for parts to repair it" and then sell the same defective
computer (designed to break down again) to yet another unsuspecting
sucker. At last count he sold the same defective computer to at least
twenty different suckers - ripped off a hundred thousand dollars and
then skipped the State - never to be heard from again.
Apparently the two of them were into all kinds of money making illegal
scams. When I confronted one of them with our evidence, he of course
denied everything but he and his partner immediately "left the state"
to parts unknown.
The next time I ever heard about either one of these crooks was when
one of them started posting on USENET, and of course this is the same
person that Nigel Brooks has been quoting to defame me! Amazing that
Brooks would quote such a person while hiding his past activities!
Birds of a feather I must assume.
Perhaps Nigel Brooks would like to clear this matter up before we get
to court?
Another person that Brooks seems to be associated with that has
contacted me from my past was involved with a group of people that
joined our team but were secretly working for the casinos. My spies
inside casino security tipped us off about these infiltrators, and we
set our secret security on them, and watched them play with team money
for about two weeks. The films produced by our security team (also
former cops) clearly showed two of the infiltrators passing team
money off to a confederate (at that time the confederate was not known
to us but he showed up later at our school after we had outed his
chums - I guess he thought we did not know about him).
We also called for a polygraph for one of these thieves, which was a
part of our team agreement, and when their chief thief and spy failed
the polygraph, and when they found out we had video from our security
showing them stealing money from the team, and even knew about their
secret deal with the casinos to sabotage our team, they too hurriedly
left the State of New Jersey.
Since Brooks started his smear and hate campaign against me, I have
received some very strange emails from someone directly associated
with this spy group - he was making some very strange and preposterous
claims about my service in Vietnam in respect to my rank. He is
clearly allied with Nigel Brooks - but again I seriously doubt if Mr.
Brooks knows all of the evidence I still have in respect to his
"confederates. I *know* the truth about these people, and I still
have those video's and the accounts of what transpired, and I can call
a dozen witnesses to confirm everything I have said. (Since they left
the state the statutes tolled - so I and dozens of other former team
members would just *love* to see these people in a court of law).
So when Brooks says something negative about my past reputation, note
the caliber and character of the person's he is quoting or relying on
to corroborate his false accusations. The *only* people Brooks can
find that will say anything bad about me in my past are the con men,
frauds, thieves and system hucksters I have exposed or caught.
I cannot wait for Brooks to parade this lot in front of a Judge, I
will have a field day exposing their past nefarious activities - not
to mention demonstrate an ulterior motive for their lies.
However, you can believe the chances of either one of these two people
Brooks has contacted about me showing up in a court of law and
confronting the evidence they know I have about them is about the
same as Nigel Brooks confessing on this forum that he has been lying
and conning the readers about me for years.
In fact, I know about 60 people that would *love* to see these people
in a court of law! They cannot wait to confront those that ripped
them off and then took off before they could be prosecuted - perhaps
Nigel Brooks will help bring these criminals to justice - who knows?
I know the statutes of limitations were tolled when they ran from the
state - perhaps we shall see some justice once and for all in respect
to this gaggle of thieves and embezzlers Brooks seems to have
associated himself with just to find a way to stop me from posting my
rebuttals to Brooks serial cons and fraud? But even then I guess
Nigel Brooks will also need to explain to the court why he has been
quoting outright thieves and con men to the degree he has? I
certainly would love to hear Nigel Brooks explanation why he hid their
past crimes when he tried to use them to defame and smear me.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:03 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
>>>into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
>>>show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
>>>consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
>>>they were hacked.
>>>Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit.
>>>--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).
>> **********************************
>>>Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
>>>stating above as:
>>>"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
>>>FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).
>> ****************************
>> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
>> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
>> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
>> -Mac, the Medic
******************************************************
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than
Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's
letter to the US Attorney.
REPLY:
Fine. Kindly provide the specific location of GOOGLE and also LYCOS
which you claim you contacted.
Kindly furnish the specific name of the specific person/office to
which "...copies of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney" was sent.
FINALLY, how about posting the copy of that alleged letter to the
US Attorney --- including the month and date it was typed and also
sent.
-Mac, the Medic
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:b1ukj51tsu918qfjm...@4ax.com...
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
Nigel Brooks Served
states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.
I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
Disclaimer Continues
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Nigel Brooks"
Question:
Lawyers Speak "again"
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:12:45 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
>
> ****************************
> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
> -Mac, the Medic
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:
Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
> snip over 1,250 lines of codswallop
>
> ********************************
> In the screed with which you polluted several newsgroups, did
> you name the specific us attorney ??
>
> Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
Message-ID: <ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com>
References: <nvydnTtryqN0da7W...@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:44:39 -0800
Bytes: 1759
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.news-media:290224
alt.politics:5246427 alt.military.retired:462395 alt.military:462303
alt.war.vietnam:765749
Mr. McDonnell, are you claiming my email post from Google is a
forgery? If you are, please provide your evidence indicating such,
and if you wish additional information you need to read (again) the
following information. Simply email me, prove your identity, and I
will gladly provide you with the information you request. Moreover,
you did not answer the question about returning calls to federal
investigators?
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than
Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's
letter to the US Attorney. Nigel Brooks will be required to reply to
those complaints under oath, and when he does he will be sued in
Federal court within two weeks of his reply. Meanwhile, I will
continue with the complaints I have been advised to file.
Mr. Brooks has a copy of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney, and
to whom else it was addressed, along with hundreds of exhibits.
Obviously, Nigel Brooks has the documents I mentioned above. All you
need to do is contact Mr. Brooks in the typical fashion you normally
do on a regular basis. (Please do not try to hide the past emails -
it would be a terrible mistake on your part as you must know they
cannot be ever really hidden).
Moreover, if you wish to *directly* receive the information you
requested, as I stated above, all you need to do is email me and ask.
As long as we can verify who you are, I will gladly provide you with
the information you have requested.
Moreover, your lies and fraud about me are well known, and if you wish
to provide them to investigators then I and my lawyers urge you to do
so - but not anonymously as you often attempt to do.
It is time to back up your hundreds of posts about me Mr. McDonnell
with your real name, we have reviewed them all and have noted several
deceptions and false statements. PLEASE repeat them while using your
real name - I urge you to do so at your first opportunity. At that
point we can determine if you are lying, and of course your real name
will be associated with your statements. If you are not lying I
would think you would WANT to back up your statements about me. If
you believe you are telling the truth, now is the time to back up your
statements with your real name.
Moreover, your acknowledgement that I provided you and others with
repeated notice to cease and desist your harassment and attacks
against me for *years* is hereby noted. Of course I attempted to
avoid litigation in every way I could, but obviously the gang's
smears, hate, fraud , *invasions of privacy* - unauthorized access to
my and my Wife's medical records, the trafficking in my private
medical information, and the posting of some of the stolen information
on USENET, and general false accusations continued regardless of my
and my lawyer's repeated notices to cease and desist such attacks.
I sincerely urge you to "go on the record" with your statements above
with specificity to the authorities and my lawyers - so be sure to
email me with your request for the information you stated you wished
to receive above.
I also have been informed that a Federal Investigator attempted to
contact you several times, yet you refused to speak with him nor
return his telephone calls. Is that information true or not? If it
is true then why are you withholding information from this
investigator?
Meanwhile, once again, I urge you to immediately cease and desist
your harassment, taunting and defamation as you have posted above and
elsewhere on this forum.
Douglas Reiman a.k.a. Doug Grant (Tm)
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:b1ukj51tsu918qfjm...@4ax.com...
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:
Rebuttal: Your statements above have been proved a lie by Google. I
have posted their email below. If you wish additional information you
need to email me directly and request it. I will gladly provide it
when you do. If you are afraid to back up your statements about me
with your real name that is understandable. Lying to investigators is
not a wise thing to do. Moreover, you have failed to answer the
question if you refused to call back or talk with a federal
investigator when he attempted to contact you several times? Why are
you hiding from that question?
See below:
NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
Nigel Brooks Served
states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.
I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
Disclaimer Continues
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Nigel Brooks"
Question:
Lawyers Speak "again"
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>By this time Mr. Nigel N. Brooks and some of his gang members have
>been contacted by the legal departments from Google and Lycos asking
>them for sworn certification in respect to their rampant and flagrant
>copyright violations on their "Get Doug" web sites and Google groups
>(Federal court has ruled that "Fair Use" does not apply if a pattern
>of spite and defamation is connected to the copyright violations).
Poppycock.
Document your contention.
Provide proof... or slither away.
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Ergo, Mr. Brooks already knows the name of my law firm, the law
>enforcement people that are already involved, and he has by now read
>my law firm's letter to the US Attorney, and to various Federal law
>enforcement entities.
Again, provide proof, provide evidence of the above claim.
Say, why don't you post that letter your alleged law firm is supposed
to have sent to the US Attorney -----
The date, and the location.
Oh, yeah, you have the habit of posturing and engaging in antics and
making threats but then failing to follow through....
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Moreover, my law firm has further contacted several
>Federal Investigators over some of the issues mentioned herein, and I
>have, based upon advice of my counsel, personally contacted the FBI
>in Portland, Or, and in Vancouver, Wa. I have been advised by the
>FBI to file an official complaint with the FBI, and file a complaint
>with the Oregon Police. I have also filed a complaint with the Clark
>County Sheriff's office, and I am preparing other complaints for other
>states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
>the US Attorney.
==================
Gee, TANKFIXER and I live here in the Portland area.
I wonder which one you are claiming that you have gone to the F.B.I.
about ???
Which one did you go to Clark County about?
Gee....
I wonder if you have the courage to name that veteran?
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and
>it is ready to go as soon as Nigel N. Brooks (and/or some of his key
>gang members) respond under an oath to the official legal complaints
>and to the official complaints filed with Google and Lycos.
>
>It appears, one way or another, this issue is going to the courts.
=================
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
You have been making that threats for year after year after year.
Usually when your claims where challenged.
And then you come up with your theory of people hacking into GOOGLE
and those nasty black helicopters sending those mind-reading rays into
your skull when you aren't wearing your tinfoil helmet....
Jeez.
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>If you believe my actions are Draconian, then I must ask what would
>you do if someone lied and posted that you were a pedophile, dealt in
>child porno, broke into your medical records and posted some of them
>on USENET, used fraud and forged FBI reports to defame you, lied
>profusely about your military service (such as claiming I was never in
>combat) and posted thousands of lies stating that I claimed I received
>a Purple Heart medal, which of course I never said? Not to mention
>the filing of false criminal charges against you and experiencing the
>direction, tutelage and incitement from Nigel N. Brooks to his
>smear/hate and con gang members to continue with such fraud and abuse
>of process with similar acts?
======================
Well, gee chuckles, you've also claimed that people have not been in
the mililitary, have not been in combat.... remember?
And, of course, when you were challenged and a wager would benefit
HABIT FOR HUMANITY you claimed you have proof this person was
not in the military but, when it came time for you to post that
information you failed. Completely.
You also stated that that veteran would NOT send two documents to
Dai Uy in Hawaii for him to consider. You bragged that such would not
be done.
HOWEVER, such was done within two hours.
Days later you still had NOT sent your evidence that the veteran was
not a veteran.
HOWEVER, you still have not provided any proof that you were in
combat. You have provided sufficient comments regarding Vietnam where
you functioned as a Personnel Sergent. But, again, no evidence that
you were combat.
That is not necessarily a "bad" thing.
You served.
And, you were in a combat zone.
As for a person claiming you are a pedophile, kindly provide that
information, and the date.
As for the alleged F.B.I. document, you are definitely a loon if you
believe that anyone will take that document seriously, as the person
who authored that was irritated at your abuse, your antics in another
Newsgroup.
As for the PRUPLE HEART claim: you words stand alone.
In that message thread with Chip you clearing claimed that you had a
Purple Heart and that your was earned "...in a real war". Obviously,
as is so often your ploy, you desperately sought to demean Chip and
his serving in Lebannon. There was absolutely no reference to any
Purple Heart Card until AFTER you were challenged and there was
found no Purple Heart in your records.
At that point, as you continued with your assertion, copies of your
posts and your statements were sent to STOLEN VALOR and the D.A.V.
and the V.F.W. and they were asked to check your military history and
ascertain whether or not you were issued a Purple Heart.
Given your posting history, I believe that what YOU call abuse and
fraud is anyone challenging your statements regarding your military
history and service. That has been done by serveral veterans and
quite a bit of discrepency has been discovered.
Rather than admit you made up stories you have decided to attack and
threaten lawsuits.
That apparently has worked in the past, on other newsgroups.
On this particular newsgroup it has not.
Especially with you being unable to provide any specific information.
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Once again, I have offered Nigel Brooks dozens of times (and/or any
>of his con/hate/smear gang members) the opportunity to take their
>fraud and false accusations to the American Association of
>Arbitrators, or to any legal department of any University they select,
>and if either of those entities agrees with Nigel Brooks in respect to
>his accusations about me, I will pay for their services. HOWEVER, if
>those legal experts agree that my rebuttals are correct and accurate,
>then Nigel Brooks and/or his smear/hate/con gang members pay for the
>independent legal analysis.
=========================
As you have already been told, numerous times, given your years of
abuse, of threats, of you stories, and your antics when challenged,
several of the veterans have repeatedly told you that they are not
interested in the "American Association of Arbitrators".
You have threatened lawsuits; you have threatened Court.
They have told you to proceed.
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
>panties, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
>and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
>legal experts . . . and the reason they hide from such independent
>analysis is obvious to me - they know they are lying.
================
On the contrary, I believe that it is you, yourself, who consistently
runds, ducks, hides, cowers.... and to use your own words, it is you
who pisses their panties and snivel one pathetic excuse after another
to refuse to provide any names of "Law Enforcement Offices", the
specific F.B.I. office and the U.S. Attorney's office....
I believe that the reason is quite evident.
I believe that you are an elephantine mass of protoplasmic jelly
wrapped (not too tightly) within the boundaries of narcissism and
paranoid fantasies which permits your many lies to be seen as "The
Truth".
-Mac, the Medic
tankfixer
NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net says...
>
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:41:44 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Moreover, my law firm has further contacted several
> >Federal Investigators over some of the issues mentioned herein, and I
> >have, based upon advice of my counsel, personally contacted the FBI
> >in Portland, Or, and in Vancouver, Wa. I have been advised by the
> >FBI to file an official complaint with the FBI, and file a complaint
> >with the Oregon Police. I have also filed a complaint with the Clark
> >County Sheriff's office, and I am preparing other complaints for other
> >states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
> >the US Attorney.
>
> ==================
> Gee, TANKFIXER and I live here in the Portland area.
> I wonder which one you are claiming that you have gone to the F.B.I.
> about ???
What are the penialties for attempting to use the FBI to harass innocent
persons...
> Which one did you go to Clark County about?
Mayb ehe went to turn himself in to Clark County...
> Gee....
> I wonder if you have the courage to name that veteran?
He won't name anyone becuase he is afraid of the consequences...
Nigel Brooks
"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25a7573...@news.bytemine.net...
> In article <87crj55kkqiq6rf6p...@4ax.com>,
> NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net says...
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:41:44 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Moreover, my law firm has further contacted several
>> >Federal Investigators over some of the issues mentioned herein, and I
>> >have, based upon advice of my counsel, personally contacted the FBI
>> >in Portland, Or, and in Vancouver, Wa. I have been advised by the
>> >FBI to file an official complaint with the FBI, and file a complaint
>> >with the Oregon Police. I have also filed a complaint with the Clark
>> >County Sheriff's office, and I am preparing other complaints for other
>> >states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
>> >the US Attorney.
>>
>> ==================
>> Gee, TANKFIXER and I live here in the Portland area.
>> I wonder which one you are claiming that you have gone to the F.B.I.
>> about ???
>
> What are the penialties for attempting to use the FBI to harass innocent
> persons...
>
Other than civil remedies I don't believe there are any. Having been
assigned to an FBI led Joint Intelligence Group for a period in my career,
I'm fairly familiar with their practices and the fact that any complaints he
filed with them would have been consigned to the KoOk file, with no further
action.
Nigel Brooks
tankfixer
As much as i figured..
Well, I don't need a third house so I guess I shall just contiue to
ignore his meaningless threats..
DGVREIMAN
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired
Subject: Re: NIGEL BROOKS REP CON -REBUTTAL
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:35:17 -0600
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <7q6q2o...@mid.individual.net>
References: <5sidnS37scmClqnW...@giganews.com>
<b1ukj51tsu918qfjm...@4ax.com>
<ks2dnVPRvLNnVqfW...@giganews.com>
<87crj55kkqiq6rf6p...@4ax.com>
<MPG.25a7573...@news.bytemine.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
qhWf8YHcu4goiAncUGVvGQ4UPo4c03VFGgZ6IjqY9Gz9tq7ZE=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bhqknGicC9zxSnWAKEyMmE+kZkY=
In-Reply-To: <MPG.25a7573...@news.bytemine.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726
Bytes: 2840
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.military.retired:462642
alt.military:462898 alt.news-media:290376 alt.politics:5253688
alt.war.vietnam:765977
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7q6q2o...@mid.individual.net...
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks you have been provided a criminal statute
several times, and you have acknowledged in reply (several times) the
Federal Statute that prevents anyone from misusing the name of the
FBI. Your claim otherwise is preposterous!
Moreover, now you are claiming that you were an FBI agent and the fact
one agent spent 45 minutes on the telephone telling me what to do and
how to file a complaint, all the time this Agent was lying to me and
he will just "kook file" my complaint?
I bet he will be very interested in your FBI representation. I
wonder if he knows that you are speaking for the FBI on USENET? I
also wonder if the FBI knows that you are telling everyone on USENET
that the FBI is worthless, and they just "Kook file" all complaints
referred to them after a thorough investigation by Federal
Investigators and from the US Attorney?
I wonder if the FBI will agree with you? How about if I ask them?
Hint, you NEVER were an FBI agent in your pathetic life, and your
statement that the FBI discards complaints referred to them by a US
Attorney or other Federal Investigators is the most outrageous fraud
and deceptive nonsense I have ever heard, even from someone as
unethical as you are.
I certainly would like to include your statements and post above to
the FBI when I and my lawyers file our official complaint. I hope you
do not mind?
Trying to use your past "working with" the FBI routine (many a
security guard and janitor "worked with" the FBI at one time or
another) as a means to keep your smear gang intact and to incite them
to continue to smear and attack me is about as egregious as you
constantly referencing the US Custom Service to add false credibility
to your plethora of cons, fraud, false accusations, serial lying,
defamation, libel and unethical incitements and directions to your
hate gang about me.
If you do not wish me to add your "FBI Agent" misrepresentation above
to my complaint letter me know. I am sure the FBI would just love to
know you are using some past "working with them" event to add
credibility to your fraud, and your defamation of the FBI in general.
Also, we are very interested in whether you ever posted, dealt with,
received or passed on any private information about me or my wife to
any source, and/or if you received any such information from any of
your associates? Also, was any of my private information ever posted
on your Google web site or your other web sites?
Please answer the question if of course you do not wish to obstruct
Justice.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>