yo, ray!
Hugh Lawson
Hey, Ray,
Did you notice that Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona State University said
this.
Simpson (ASU): "Ray just wets himself before rolling in his feces."
How sad that Brooks has to attack others in this way. Maybe we can
persuade Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona State University to INFORM on
himself. That would be a new move for him.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Raymond O'Hara
Hugh Lawson
> brooks has severe emotional problems.
His behavior matches this profile. Notice "fragile self-esteem".
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/narcissistic-personality-disorder/DS00652/DSECTION=symptoms
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
![[blank]'s profile photo](http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-UjX2c51nsA8DKleNioKvx0Zgu8BST_gPdVrIXxO5XfOX98XZGw=s40-c)
[blank]
> "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > brooks has severe emotional problems.
>
> His behavior matches this profile. Notice "fragile self-esteem".
>
Hugh, it appears to me that Ray and you need to believe that anyone
who finds either of you objectionable must be sick.
That fits the description you've offered (and you've offered it
multiple times).
The description you post describes you in other ways as well.
For example, you love to say that the behavior of others makes you
feel smug.
And then there's this classic:
"If people like me had more unchallenged influence, which must be the
case in lots of countries, then the mutinous populists would have
fewer chances to get their way."
So no wonder you know about these things. Maybe you've been subjected
to court-ordered treatment (a suggestion I've borrowed from your own
ranting).
So ... to turn your own whining back on you ...
Hugh displays awareness of psychological counseling terms. Something
you've experienced, eh? Court-ordered?
Keep obsessing over me. It keeps you off the streets, even if it
keeps you up at night.
:)
Hugh Lawson
> On Oct 2, 4:51 am, Hugh Lawson <hlaw...@triad.rr.com> wrote:
> > "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > brooks has severe emotional problems.
> >
> > His behavior matches this profile. Notice "fragile self-esteem".
> >
> > http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/narcissistic-personality-disorder/DS...
>
> Hugh, it appears to me that Ray and you need to believe that anyone
> who finds either of you objectionable must be sick.
No, Brooks. You are the problem. You are not a normal person.
[ snip]
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
[blank]
> "[blank]" <bdsimpso...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > On Oct 2, 4:51 am, Hugh Lawson <hlaw...@triad.rr.com> wrote:
> > > "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > > brooks has severe emotional problems.
>
> > > His behavior matches this profile. Notice "fragile self-esteem".
>
> > >http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/narcissistic-personality-disorder/DS...
>
> > Hugh, it appears to me that Ray and you need to believe that anyone
> > who finds either of you objectionable must be sick.
>
> No, Brooks. You are the problem. You are not a normal person.
Somehow I don't believe that someone like you is widely accepted as a
sane arbiter of normality.
Note what you said about Ray last April 7:
"Ray's self-esteem is based on his contempt for others."
You just repeat the same charges against whoever your target of the
day might be. And yet these declarations say far more about your
issues than about the people you attack. You argue that everyone with
whom you disagree is deeply flawed. Yet you've also said that such
charges reveal your own innermost issues, in the classic charge of
projection that you like to make.
Try developing new material instead of repeating the same old
humbuggery.
[blank]
> > brooks has severe emotional problems.
>
> His behavior matches this profile. Notice "fragile self-esteem".
Ray on Hugh: "hugh invents straw men and he also projects his
feelings onto
others."
Hugh on Ray: "Ray's self-esteem is based on his contempt for
others."
Hugh Lawson
> Somehow I don't believe that someone like you is widely accepted as a
> sane arbiter of normality.
Ah but Brooks's track record is a Museum of Abnormality spread out
over the google archive for the derisive snickering of the multitudes.
For example, there is Brooks's lecturing others on "Success", when
everybody knows about his wrecking his own personal life, and dragging
the wreckage through the Arizona courts.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Hugh Lawson
[snip]
Trapped like a miscreant schoolboy, Brooks tries to divert attention
to others, a practice he probably learned in his early school days.
Is that when Brooks first discovered how to be a snitch?
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Raymond O'Hara
> "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > brooks has severe emotional problems.
>
> His behavior matches this profile. Notice "fragile self-esteem".
>
>
> --
> Hugh Lawson
> hlaw...@triad.rr.com
that's our miss brooks to a T.
it's like a checklist of his posting habits
C.M. German
"Raymond O'Hara" <raymon...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a30b4701-516a-4aa3...@w32g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
You shouldn't insult Eve Arden that way.
scribe7716
> Hey, Ray,
>
> Did you notice that Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona State University said
> this.
>
> Simpson (ASU): "Ray just wets himself before rolling in his feces."
>
> How sad that Brooks has to attack others in this way.
Sadder still that you feel it appropriate to repeat it giving it wider
currency.
[blank]
> "[blank]" <bdsimpso...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > Somehow I don't believe that someone like you is widely accepted as a
> > sane arbiter of normality.
>
> Ah but Brooks's track record is a Museum of Abnormality spread out
> over the google archive for the derisive snickering of the multitudes.
>
> For example, there is Brooks's lecturing others on "Success", when
> everybody knows about his wrecking his own personal life, and dragging
> the wreckage through the Arizona courts.
Well, Hugh, you've now demonstrated your dark side again. I was
wondering when it would appear. That it's ignorant is another matter
altogether.
Talk about creepy.
Still, your behavior shows us all why you were into learning so much
about yourself at the Mayo Clinic website.
I suspect Bob Taubman will not cheer you on in this case. He knows
why. Wonder what Anita and her friends will make of it.
Sleep well, Hugh.
Hugh Lawson
Sad to you, but I *want* the assaults of Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona
State to be more widely known.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Hugh Lawson
> Well, Hugh, you've now demonstrated your dark side again. I was
> wondering when it would appear. That it's ignorant is another matter
> altogether.
>
> Talk about creepy.
>
> Still, your behavior shows us all why you were into learning so much
> about yourself at the Mayo Clinic website.
>
> I suspect Bob Taubman will not cheer you on in this case. He knows
> why. Wonder what Anita and her friends will make of it.
>
> Sleep well, Hugh.
More piffle from Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona State University.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
[blank]
We'll see. How was the extension's gala? Did Bob like it?
scribe7716
> > > Did you notice that Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona State University said
> > > this.
>
> > > Simpson (ASU): "Ray just wets himself before rolling in his feces."
>
> > > How sad that Brooks has to attack others in this way.
>
> > Sadder still that you feel it appropriate to repeat it giving it wider
> > currency.
>
> Sad to you, but �I *want* the assaults of Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona
> State to be more widely known.
No matter who was target, who the repetition might hurt? If you want
Brooks' "assaults" more widely known why not limit yourself to Brooks'
"assaults" on you?
Hugh Lawson
> We'll see. How was the extension's gala? Did Bob like it?
You're getting creepier Brooks. ;-)
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Hugh Lawson
[blank]
> "[blank]" <bdsimpso...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > We'll see. How was the extension's gala? Did Bob like it?
>
> You're getting creepier Brooks. ;-)
Sleep well, Hugh. It will make for a wonderful 70th birthday
celebration in a few months.
Hugh Lawson
[blank]
Because Hugh knows I tell the truth about him.
I was aware from Hugh's past associates that he had a deep, dark,
malicious side born out of his insecurity and frustration, personal as
well as professional. Note he always posts about these themes, even
as he also posts about how people project their own innermost issues
onto others when they post. It's all rather transparent.
This is at the root of his bragging that he feels smug. Have you ever
heard anyone else brag about that? They say he was mindlessly
arrogant.
And now Hugh's darkness, which has popped up here and there, is
revealed for everyone to see.
The trouble with these exchanges is that you find yourself dragged
down to the level of your foe. I do regret that. Live and learn.
[blank]
> "[blank]" <bdsimpso...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > On Oct 3, 2:07 pm, Hugh Lawson <hlaw...@triad.rr.com> wrote:
> > > "[blank]" <bdsimpso...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > > > We'll see. How was the extension's gala? Did Bob like it?
>
> > > You're getting creepier Brooks. ;-)
>
> > Sleep well, Hugh. It will make for a wonderful 70th birthday
> > celebration in a few months.
>
> Creepier still. ;-)
You misrepresent my private life, I return the favor.
Hugh Lawson
> Because Hugh knows I tell the truth about him.
What was the man who administered the humanities quiz to Brooks? Steve
somebody, West?
Brooks informed on him and bragged about it onlist.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Hugh Lawson
> You misrepresent my private life
You need to come clean about your personality disorder, Brooks.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
slotrot
Seems like Hugh has done to you, as you have done to others. Your
moral indignation is rather humourous. Perhaps you should quit your
objectionable behaviour by your trying to drag others though the muck
by inuendo and without facts.
While I don't cheer Hugh on, what goes around, comes around.
You can end it by ending it.
scribe7716
> > > > Sadder still that you feel it appropriate to repeat it giving it wider
> > > > currency.
>
> > > Sad to you, but I *want* the assaults of Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona
> > > State to be more widely known.
>
> > No matter who was target, who the repetition might hurt? �If you want
> > Brooks' "assaults" more widely known why not limit yourself to Brooks'
> > "assaults" on you?
>
> MYOB.
Since you post in an open forum you invite free comment on your
posts. Man up, Hugh. If you must take Brooks on have the stones to
take him on one-on-one.
Hugh Lawson
> > MYOB.
>
> Since you post in an open forum you invite free comment on your
> posts. Man up, Hugh. If you must take Brooks on have the stones to
> take him on one-on-one.
MYOB.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
scribe7716
> > > > > How sad that Brooks has to attack others in this way.
>
> > > > Sadder still that you feel it appropriate to repeat it giving it wider
> > > > currency.
>
> > > Sad to you, but I *want* the assaults of Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona
> > > State to be more widely known.
>
> > No matter who was target, who the repetition might hurt? �If you want
> > Brooks' "assaults" more widely known why not limit yourself to Brooks'
> > "assaults" on you?
>
> MYOB.
Since you post in an open forum your posts are subject to public
comment.
If you want to battle Brooks man up and do it one-on-one.
Hugh Lawson
> Since you post in an open forum your posts are subject to public
> comment.
>
> If you want to battle Brooks man up and do it one-on-one.
>
Piffle.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
Raymond O'Hara
> "[blank]" <bdsimpso...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > Because Hugh knows I tell the truth about him.
>
> What was the man who administered the humanities quiz to Brooks? Steve
> somebody, West?
>
> Brooks informed on him and bragged about it onlist.
>
> --
> Hugh Lawson
Steve Wall, and he laughed at the poltroon over it.
its seems all his scurrilous attacks have failed except in the case of
the unfortunate mark b,
and i'm sure that only succeeded because mark probably sucked in
person as much as he did on the net and the company wanted an excuse
to get rid of him
scribe7716
> > If you want to battle Brooks man up and do it one-on-one.
>
> Piffle.
Yeah, I guess expecting you to man up is piffle.
slotrot
What is this "man up" crap? What is it that Hugh has to prove to
someone who demands consideration when he has none for others? Rather
hypocritical, don't you think?
slotrot
Before someone jumps all over me; "What is it that Hugh has to prove
to a certain someone who demands consideration when that same certain
someone has none for others?"
scribe7716
> > > > If you want to battle Brooks man up and do it one-on-one.
>
> > > Piffle.
>
> > Yeah, I guess expecting you to man up is piffle.
>
> What is this "man up" crap? �What is it that Hugh has to prove to
> someone who demands consideration when he has none for others? �Rather
> hypocritical, don't you think?
Hugh has to prove nothing to no one. If, however, he has grievances
against Brooks... and he obviously does... it would be good if he
showed the stones to go up against Brooks mano a mano without dragging
Ray, "Steve somebody, West?," et al into it.
Hugh Lawson
> Hugh has to prove nothing to no one.
I agree.
--
Hugh Lawson
hla...@triad.rr.com
scribe7716
Other than maybe yourself.
Hugh Lawson
slotrot
But they are already in it. Behaviour by example, they being the
examples.
slotrot
Don't we all.
scribe7716
> > Other than maybe yourself.
>
> Piffle.
Unfortunatly, Hugh, piffle is a pretty good description of what you
have become. Brooks has whipped you... belay that, you have let him
push you into whipping yourself.