Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Nigger Felons, Too Stupid To Vote.

Skip to first unread message

Dave Cross

Nov 18, 2021, 7:05:02 AM11/18/21
April 3, 2021
On Election Day 2016, Crystal Mason went to vote after her
mother insisted that she make her voice heard in the
presidential election. When her name didn’t appear on official
voting rolls at her polling place in Tarrant County, Texas, she
filled out a provisional ballot, not thinking anything of it.

Ms. Mason’s ballot was never officially counted or tallied
because she was ineligible to vote: She was on supervised
release after serving five years for tax fraud. Nonetheless,
that ballot has wrangled her into a lengthy appeals process
after a state district court sentenced her to five years in
prison for illegal voting, as she was a felon on probation when
she cast her ballot.

Ms. Mason maintains that she didn’t know she was ineligible to

“This is very overwhelming, waking up every day knowing that
prison is on the line, trying to maintain a smile on your face
in front of your kids and you don’t know the outcome,” Ms. Mason
said in a phone interview. “Your future is in someone else’s
hands because of a simple error.”

Her case is now headed for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals,
the highest state court for criminal cases, whose judges said on
Wednesday that they had decided to hear it. Ms. Mason
unsuccessfully asked for a new trial and lost her case in an
appellate court.

This new appeal is the last chance for Ms. Mason, 46, who is out
on appeal bond, to avoid prison. If her case has to advance to
the federal court system, Ms. Mason would have to appeal from a

Alison Grinter, one of Ms. Mason’s lawyers, said the federal
government made it clear in the Help America Vote Act of 2002
that provisional ballots should not be criminalized because they
represent “an offer to vote — they’re not a vote in themselves.”

She said that Ms. Mason didn’t know she was ineligible and was
still convicted, and that Texas’ election laws stipulate that a
person must knowingly vote illegally to be guilty of a crime.

“Crystal never wanted to be a voting rights advocate,” Ms.
Grinter said Thursday. “She didn’t want to be a political
football here. She just wanted to be a mom and a grandmother and
put her life on track, but she’s really taken it and run with
it, and she refuses to be intimidated.”

A Tarrant County grand jury indicted Ms. Mason for a violation
of the Texas election laws, a spokeswoman for the Tarrant County
Criminal District Attorney’s Office said in a statement.

Editors’ Picks

5 Minutes That Will Make You Love Brahms

After Genetic Testing, I Took a Chance on an ‘Imperfect’

Europe Plunders Paris for Talent, and P.S.G. Pays the Price
Continue reading the main story
“Our office offered Mason the option of probation in this case,
which she refused,” the statement said. “Mason waived a trial by
jury and chose to proceed to trial before the trial judge.”

In March 2018, Judge Ruben Gonzalez of Texas’ 432nd District
Court found Ms. Mason guilty of a second-degree felony for
illegally voting.

According to Tommy Buser-Clancy, a lawyer at the American Civil
Liberties Union of Texas, Ms. Mason should never have never been
convicted. If there is ambiguity in someone’s eligibility, the
provisional ballot system is there to account for it, he said.

“That’s very scary,” he said of Ms. Mason’s conviction, “and it
guts the entire purpose of the provisional ballot system.”

If her eligibility was incorrect, he said, “that should be the
end of the story.”

The appeals court’s decision could set an important precedent
for the future of how the public interprets voting, especially
if they’re confused, according to Joseph R. Fishkin, a law
professor at the University of Texas at Austin. He said he hoped
that the court establishes a principle not to “criminalize
people for being confused about the complexities of the
interaction between the criminal law and election law.”

Professor Fishkin said that he and many other law experts
believe that if the court upholds Ms. Mason’s conviction, the
state would be in direct conflict with the federal Help America
Vote Act.

“It’s very important for basic fairness and for participation
around the country that people are confident that when they act
in good faith and aren’t trying to pull a fast one, that you’re
not going to start charging them for crimes,” Professor Fishkin
said Thursday. “If this case stands, that’s obviously
concerning, because a lot of people who may not understand the
details of their status or who is allowed to vote will be
deterred from voting.”

Across the United States, 5.2 million Americans cannot vote
because of a prior felony conviction, according to the
Sentencing Project, a research organization dedicated to crime
and punishment.

The office of the Texas attorney general, Ken Paxton, said that
531 election fraud offenses have been prosecuted since 2004. The
outcomes of those cases were not immediately available. At least
72 percent of Mr. Paxton’s voter fraud cases have targeted
people of color, according to The Houston Chronicle.

Ms. Mason’s cause has received support from the Cato Institute,
a libertarian think tank. Clark Neily, a senior vice president
for criminal justice at the institute, said the case represented
an example of excessive criminalization.

“It’s putting people in a position where they can commit a
criminal offense without even knowing that they’re in violation
of any law,” he said.

Celina Stewart, chief counsel at the League of Women Voters,
which has filed supporting briefs on Ms. Mason’s behalf, said
her case sent “a very clear message” that people with felony
convictions should be cautious.

“She’s being made an example, and the example is that you don’t
want returning citizens, Black people, Black women to vote,” she
said. “That’s an egregious narrative, and we have to push back
on that because that’s not how democracy works.”

0 new messages