Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
DTV to Phones, Tablets
5 views
Skip to first unread message
K. B.
May 12, 2012, 3:32:39 AM5/12/12
to
<http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/story/2012-05-06/live-tv-startups/54862394/1>
New ventures Syncbak, Dyle, Mobile500 and Aereo are among
those aiming their mobile digital TV technology at consumers
who want to eliminate or reduce the cost of their cable or
satellite subscriptions.
~~~
Kirk Bayne
alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
<http://avdtv.tripod.com/avdtv.htm>
New ventures Syncbak, Dyle, Mobile500 and Aereo are among
those aiming their mobile digital TV technology at consumers
who want to eliminate or reduce the cost of their cable or
satellite subscriptions.
~~~
Kirk Bayne
alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
<http://avdtv.tripod.com/avdtv.htm>
Daniel W. Rouse Jr.
May 26, 2012, 3:06:45 AM5/26/12
to
"K. B." <hotmail.com@lis2lis2> wrote in message
news:1e4sq7pasftught5s...@4ax.com...
streaming--provided, it does not have the issues that ATSC does.
But, isn't this just like the concept Qualcomm did, like a Media-Flo
concept?
It seemed from the article, they meant live streaming via subscription
service, but via an app, and the app would be free. In other cases, they
would pay for the antenna, kind of like a satellite TV concept.
Still counts as "subscribing", though.
So I guess, interesting, but it really isn't new.
I suppose if it works better than ATSC does (or rather, the way it did not
work for me), then I would be much more interested in the mobile version.
news:1e4sq7pasftught5s...@4ax.com...
> <http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/story/2012-05-06/live-tv-startups/54862394/1>
>
> New ventures Syncbak, Dyle, Mobile500 and Aereo are among
> those aiming their mobile digital TV technology at consumers
> who want to eliminate or reduce the cost of their cable or
> satellite subscriptions.
>
This would be a good idea of mobile OTA--in the form of live
>
> New ventures Syncbak, Dyle, Mobile500 and Aereo are among
> those aiming their mobile digital TV technology at consumers
> who want to eliminate or reduce the cost of their cable or
> satellite subscriptions.
>
streaming--provided, it does not have the issues that ATSC does.
But, isn't this just like the concept Qualcomm did, like a Media-Flo
concept?
It seemed from the article, they meant live streaming via subscription
service, but via an app, and the app would be free. In other cases, they
would pay for the antenna, kind of like a satellite TV concept.
Still counts as "subscribing", though.
So I guess, interesting, but it really isn't new.
I suppose if it works better than ATSC does (or rather, the way it did not
work for me), then I would be much more interested in the mobile version.
0 new messages