Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Child Molester

7 views
Skip to first unread message

bobandcarole

unread,
Oct 21, 2007, 5:16:35 AM10/21/07
to
On Oct 21, 2:13?am, 4s00th <4s0...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:18:49 -0700, gbedingfield...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >Our mutual friend has moved to California. He hasn't been able to
> >access yahoo email since it stopped working without javascript
> >enabled.
>
> >If this is an emergency, you better lay it on me here. I have access
> >to the desk officer all night.
>
> Additional information that I dug up from Usenet:
> Please note, the original posts are gone due to X-Archive switch and
> are quoted here in responses:
>
> From: 4s00th <4s0...@thetruth.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.support.boy-lovers
> Subject: Re: PING: Bob and Carol
> Message-ID: <6ibb83pp4s3f59lh4...@4ax.com>
> References:
> <959546e23e23f3e00f8da0d8f843d...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 35
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenetserver.com
> X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
> properly.
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:23:08 EDT
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:23:08 -0400
>
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:45:40 +0200, Fritz Wuehler
>
> <fr...@spamexpire-200706.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
> >Hi bobandcarol
>
> > It is almost the weekend and I'm within hours of raping my
> >first boy and it is your fault. One thing is I've decided to
> >wear a rubber when I sodomoze his ass. Not when I face fuck him,
> >though. I'm going to take some pictures of him. Post a real
> >email address and I'll send you some. Just so you know I really
> >did it. Oh yeah, his name is Jesse. Nice boy. Very athletic and
> >very pretty. He is all boy. Until I rape him that is. After that
> >he'll wake up at night wanting a dick in his mouth or up his ass.
>
> From: 4s00th <4s0...@thetruth.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.support.boy-lovers
> Subject: Re: Now I Understand
> Message-ID: <mggj839nl3ptr2f4i...@4ax.com>
> References:
> <a6540601e0e89d7fc74f43c415802...@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 18
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenetserver.com
> X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
> properly.
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:27:57 EDT
> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:27:55 -0400
>
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:06:16 +0100 (BST), Anonymous
>
> <nob...@mixmin.net> wrote:
> >Now I understand why you guys are so quick to claim that you
> >don't really molest boys. I decided to take another shot at
> >Jesse on SUnday. I got close enough to him to smell his sweet
> >scent. I also got close enough to him to see that the adult male
> >he was with was packing a rod. And I don't mean a dick. Jesse is
> >a real pretty boy but I don't think I'm ready to use as much
> >force as his dad is willing to use to protect him. Definitley
> >not worth risking a gunshot wound.
>
> >I might look for another boy or I might just go back to looking
> >at eye candy rather than thinking about really getting some.
>
> From: bobandcarole <bobandcarol...@hotmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.support.boy-lovers
> Subject: Re: Undecided
> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:27:40 -0700
> Organization:http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 37
> Message-ID: <1183746460.726496.102...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
> References: <33d235749911c3046c53c3af24851...@ecn.org>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.133
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1183746460 14501 127.0.0.1 (6 Jul 2007
> 18:27:40 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-ab...@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:27:40 +0000 (UTC)
> In-Reply-To: <33d235749911c3046c53c3af24851...@ecn.org>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 7.0; Windows
> NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 spider-mtc-te08.proxy.aol.com[400C7088]
> (Prism/1.2.0), HTTP/1.1 cache-mtc-ac04.proxy.aol.com[400C7485]
> (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])
> Complaints-To: groups-ab...@google.com
> Injection-Info: q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com;
> posting-host=64.12.116.133;
> posting-account=dKkT1Q0AAADQANnMVTdCXUosd7Msy2Yj
>
> On Jul 6, 11:26?am, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm still undecided about posting Jesse's full name, address and
> > known hangouts. I got real close to him at the pool last night.
> > He really is a great kid in terms of being handsome and he also
> > seemed to have a nice personality. Unless you are like a suicide
> > bomber or something, I don't think there is any way you will
> > ever get into his pants. I've never seen him alone and he is
> > usually with at least three or four other kids. They all also
> > seem to be very well supervised (protected?) by their dads.
> > There must be some time they are away from adults, but I can't
> > tell when it is.
>
> > Jesse was at the pool last night. At first it looked like he was
> > there with three others boys, at least one was a younger
> > brother. Off in the deeper water were his dad, another dad and
> > some older brothers, so there had to be about ten of them
> > together. They were really fun to watch playing together. It
> > makes me think that maybe I want to just become traditional and
> > shack up with a wench and have kids of my own. I managed to
> > maneuver close enough to arrange to have one of the younger boys
> > "bump" in to me. He was very apologetic, but I thought it felt
> > great.
>
> > All these boys looked really nice, but I can't put my finger on
> > exactly why I find them so attractive. I got a really good look
> > at all of them naked, and now I'm not certain that their nuts
> > are what I'm interested in. I used to think that a boy was just
> > a life support system for balls, but now I'm seeing that I
> > really like the whole boy and I don't think feeling their nuts
> > would be worth ruining a friendship. Isn't it ironic. I'd have
> > to get emotionally close to the boy in order to feel his nuts,
> > but once I am that close I don't think I'd want to risk messing
> > things up by touching him. I'm really coming to see that boys
> > are so much more than their cocks.
>
> After recalling these posts, I felt that it might be helpful for you
> to have them.
>
> Happy hunting.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
4s00th is a very sick fuck.

"I cannot, in good conscience, claim that none of the posts contain
child pornography as I did not download the entire group, only a few
random samples -- all of which did NOT contain any pornographic
content or any illegal content. There was, indeed, nudity -- but we
all know that nudity does not equal pornography"--pedophile "4s00th"
admits he downloaded pictures of nude boys.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/b1706f807a0ffc6e?


Every decent person that reads it's vile confessions wants to vomit.
Not to mention rearrange "4s00th's" face :-) Anonymous pedophile
"4s00th" is a pathetic cripple that most likely lives alone, fondling
itself while dreaming about sodomizing innocent children. How utterly
humiliating for sick pedophile bastard "4s00th"


Only the sickest of deviants would even THINK about sodomizing young
boys and "4s00th" freely admits his perverted thoughts and even has
the gall to whine for acceptance because it confessed. "4s00th" is
evil
in its purest incarnation and definately not fit to be around
innocent
boys, or ANY decent person for that matter. "4s00th" belongs in a
cage.


"Yes, I've thought about giving little boys blow jobs, and the
fantasies have been very thrilling and exciting to me"--humiliated
pedophile 4s00th

"I am a pedophile -- someone who is sexually attracted to children; I
won't quibble about pre-adolescent or post-adolescent because I like
them all. That does not make me a threat to children"--humiliated
pedophile 4s00th

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/d768e45a1077ee84?&hl=en

Oh, and he's modest too!!


"I have on occasion been known to humiliate myself -- but then, I'm
one of the few people with sufficient intelligence to humiliate me"
--humiliated pedophile 4s00th

.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/
1139306e6ea99ff3?&hl=en


Would you allow anonymous pedophile "4s00th" to babysit your
children? After all, he says he's "not a threat to children"...

gbeding...@yahoo.com

unread,
Oct 21, 2007, 7:44:26 AM10/21/07
to
We checked this one out way back. Unless there are two Jesse's I think
this on is a sick joke. There is a Jesse we know about who fits the
description, and he is fine. All these kids are on alert until I get
to the bottom of this.

bobandcarole

unread,
Oct 21, 2007, 12:02:31 PM10/21/07
to
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/b1706f807a0...

>
> Every decent person that reads it's vile confessions wants to vomit.
> Not to mention rearrange "4s00th's" face :-) Anonymous pedophile
> "4s00th" is a pathetic cripple that most likely lives alone, fondling
> itself while dreaming about sodomizing innocent children. How utterly
> humiliating for sick pedophile bastard "4s00th"
>
> Only the sickest of deviants would even THINK about sodomizing young
> boys and "4s00th" freely admits his perverted thoughts and even has
> the gall to whine for acceptance because it confessed. "4s00th" is
> evil
> in its purest incarnation and definately not fit to be around
> innocent
> boys, or ANY decent person for that matter. "4s00th" belongs in a
> cage.
>
> "Yes, I've thought about giving little boys blow jobs, and the
> fantasies have been very thrilling and exciting to me"--humiliated
> pedophile 4s00th
>
> "I am a pedophile -- someone who is sexually attracted to children; I
> won't quibble about pre-adolescent or post-adolescent because I like
> them all. That does not make me a threat to children"--humiliated
> pedophile 4s00th
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/d768e45a107...

>
> Oh, and he's modest too!!
>
> "I have on occasion been known to humiliate myself -- but then, I'm
> one of the few people with sufficient intelligence to humiliate me"
> --humiliated pedophile 4s00th
>
> .http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/
> 1139306e6ea99ff3?&hl=en
>
> Would you allow anonymous pedophile "4s00th" to babysit your
> children? After all, he says he's "not a threat to children"...- Hide quoted text -

bobandcarole

unread,
Oct 21, 2007, 6:53:07 PM10/21/07
to
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Message has been deleted

bobandcarole®

unread,
Oct 22, 2007, 8:50:47 PM10/22/07
to
On Oct 22, 11:36?am, Pedophile David <farook...@picknowl.com.au>
wrote:

> Another case of Bo0by answering his own post but not adding any new
> material.

It keeps you tap-dancing, Tyrone....LOL


Message has been deleted

bobandcarole

unread,
Oct 26, 2007, 3:16:50 AM10/26/07
to
On Oct 23, 1:23?am, David <farook...@picknowl.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:50:47 -0700, bobandcarole
> <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> typed furiously:
> Interesting! I wonder who Tyrone is?

As ignorant as you are it must be a realitive...LOL


Message has been deleted
0 new messages