On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:45:58 -0700, Ken Blake wrote:
> I had never heard of Pan before.
Just FYI Pan has been mentioned here in 6 other threads this decade.
> You say ‘clone’ of Agent. Can you be
> more specific? How much like Agent is it? What are the differences? Is
> it better than Agent in some ways? Worse in others?
That could turn into a looooong list. :-(
A brief summary instead...
* Pan is designed primarily for Linux and similar operating systems
running X-Windows (or Wayland, I guess). I run Pan on Linux. I
have not tried the Windows builds.
* Pan does multiple news servers like Agent, where a single newsgroup
can pull headers from multiple servers.
* Pan is not an email client, unlike Agent.
* Subscribing to newsgroups seems closer to Agent 1 and 2 than to
later versions of Agent. The list of newsgroups you can subscribe
to is in the folders pane, not in a separate newsgroup directory
window.
* Pan does binaries. I don't know whether it does Agent's MegaJoin.
* Pan does full Unicode out of the box.
* Filtering is one area where Pan is quite different to Agent.
Pan uses scoring, where your filters contribute to a post's total
score. Headers can be tagged with colours or even ignored/hidden
based on the total score (positive = good, negative = bad).
> I don't care about it's being 64-bit, but if there are advantages to
> it over Agent, I might want to try it. Do you recommend it?
If you run Linux, download Pan from your distro's repo and try it.
I have not tried the Windows builds, so I cannot give a recommendation
either way. In particular, I don't know whether a Windows build of Pan
feels like a native Windows program or not.
--
Kind regards
Ralph Fox
Soþ hit sylf acyþeð.