Re: Shared-Secrets gone?

[Kia]

Steve <m...@privacy.net> wrote in:
<51dbeed8$0$51473$862e...@ngroups.net>
>Kia wrote - <vErCt.1158$_S....@newsfe23.iad>
>
><FU2 denied. auk restored.>
>
Your choice, I did offer "idiot" as the lesser
level of layered disdain. Be a k00k, no problem granting
you that status.

/shrug

>>
>> Steve <m...@privacy.net> wrote in:
>> <51d96178$0$10073$862e...@ngroups.net>
>> >Kia wrote - <qzzBt.319$w16...@newsfe02.iad>
>> >>
>> >> Steve <m...@privacy.net> wrote in:
>> >> <51d3f9d8$0$51378$862e...@ngroups.net>
>> >> >Kia wrote - <qzzBt.319$w16...@newsfe02.iad>
>> >> >> Steve <m...@privacy.net> wrote in:
>> >> >> <51d334aa$0$51559$862e...@ngroups.net>
>> >> >> >Kia wrote - <3zIAt.34$0_7...@newsfe21.iad>
>> >> //
>> >> >> >> [koff]
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> ... not so my investigation has shown thusfar.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Really?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> .. damn right "really".. pffft
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /finger
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Fact is I am working to get to the bottom of it all
>> >> >> whereas you sit there as per your usual MO
>> >> >> pokin' and snarkin' hoping to get a rise (fish).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well CHOMP CHOMP --->THIS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Well the facts are that my shared-secret block outsourced
>> >> >> >to newsreader.com works, whereas the newshosting one doesn't. Got
>> >> >> >any real facts to add, or just rumour?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Be real quick at highlighting this "rumour" now, wont ya, dweeb.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Sn!pe will have the goods if and when it eventuates.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Heh. Sn!pe, ole bean, perhaps you can translate for me over at
>> >> >> >SP's... Ta.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Do your own work, retard.
>> >> >> You have been using SS for years and often not in a 'nice' way.
>> >> >> If it wasn't for others I do respect I would have said SFA...simply
>> >> >> because I do not feed lowlife rotten gutless cunts like you.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> hummmph
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /dust hands
>> >> >>
>> >> >> now... kindly FOAD "steve".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> /flicks on the wire
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> ><rollseyes>.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> 'bowd all you are capable of, leech.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> HTH HAND ETC ETC ETC
>> >> >
>> >> ><picks up rattle and hands it back to Murphy>.
>> >> >Here, you dropped this, butterfingers.
>> >>
>> >> you up for a good old solid flamin', Mum?
>> >
>> >Heehee. Is that a threat?
>> >
>> Having role playing woes there, are we, Mother Steven?
>> Frilly knickers in a knot?
>> Wire in your bra way oversprung?
>>
>> ..whatever, your nervous nellie giggle
>> sure is loud :----D
>
>Huh? So was it a threat, or not?
>
Your demeanor reads as you having decided that issue, an issue you
chose to raise in running away from your ridiculous claim of rumor
mongering when called on it.
Fact is there is no rumor as I now know in proving a collaborated
reasonable conclusion.
But you, retard - and only because you are a butthurt retard - you,
retard can just keep right on speculating and posting to k00kland.

Sn!pe knows what you want to know. Go leech, 'roach.

FTR?
You and many others were only able to use S-S.com as a direct result
of the work of others you have no knowledge of. I was part of those
foundation days in bringing 'business' to the server. Dribble as much
blather your tiny focus can scroll up, you will not change history.



oH!
BIF?
/finger dart

... do get busy fixing your busted news client, like you it is
producing vacuous line syntax - AKA Usenet posted farts.

/0ff

--
fup set a/f/n