Re: EVOLUTION vs.INTELLIGENT DESIGN: ALLOW AMERICAN STUDENTS TO QUESTIONALL THEORIES - LET THE TRUTH EMERGE.

[marika]

liber...@yahoo.com wrote:

>
> I don't understand what you're saying.

BOGUS

>What, for example is "neutral
> evolution"?

that would be like me. I evolved from a pumpking, and though I am a
human being, I remain a pumpkin
and in other news, Queen Camilla, Bride of Chucky, is a pear, while
KarL Lagerfeld
is an idiot

>
> > There is, of course, more, although
> > it might be more controversial.
>
> Well duh, that's exactly the point. What "controversial" issues exist"
> You made a simple statement: "All evolution is not thought to be due to
> natural selection." I repeat my question: "What part of evolution is
> not thought due to natural selection"?

my waist. i have made no dent whatsoever in my waist. so my waist
evolved not from natural selection.

mk5000

"THOUGH the word was that Karl Lagerfeld lost 90 pounds on a diet of
horse meat, tomatoes and Diet Coke, the book detailing his methods
lists myriad unappetizing concoctions such as tuna and blackberry
mousse and calf's liver with wild strawberries. What would you expect
from a man driven by fashion? "It was for totally superficial reasons
that I got started on this diet," the Chanel designer says in "The Karl
Lagerfeld Diet," due in May. "I think that fashion is the healthiest
motivation for losing weight." At least he doesn't try to fool his
fellow dieters about how good the food is: "You have to be a real bore
like me for the diet to work." --ny post page 6