In article <kt8gn4$da3$
1...@speranza.aioe.org>,
CDB <
belle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The words "fruit" and "flies" are not only different in sense, but are
>different parts of speech as well.
Not compulsorily so. The sentence is really the linguistic equivalent
of a Necker cube, with two or three possible readings:
- The default one, in which "flies" is a verb in the first clause and
a noun in the second clause.
- The punning one, in which "flies" is a verb in both clauses. All
fruit are pretty much the same when it comes to flying, and obey
Newtonian mechanics. I guess a banana could be thought of as a sort
of lifting body, after first applying sufficient thrust. A prize
still awaits the first general, closed-form solution of the
Navier-Stokes equations....
- The counterfactual one, in which "flies" is a noun in both clauses
(requiring the reader to posit a "time fly" which is associated with
arrows in the same way as fruit flies are associated with fruit).
This requires a backtracking parser (or lots of look-ahead) and is
thus the best candidate for a "garden path" parsing.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wol...@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993