Peter Moylan wrote:
> > Your philosophical meandermentation baffles, bewilders, stymies, and
> > confused my brain. I have already read your screed 6 times and still
> > can't grasp it. But I'm not done yet. I will read your words into a newly
> > bought tape recorder and play it to myself while going to sleep. Perhaps
> > then I will fully absorb your meaning and grasp enough of it to become a
> > full-time official groupie under the auspices (and aegis) of your guruship.
> Meandermentation - nice word.
I never considered it. But now after your post I thought about it and
have to agree, it does have a certain truth to it. Of course I was trying
to be funny or way out with that word, but it really does make sense.
Of course you could be lying to me just to make me feel good about
myself because you're such a nice guy. But in this case I think you're
telling the truth. I always tell the truth. Of course there are exceptions
to all rules. But yes, I went with meandermentation because I liked the
sound of it and also to attract some small amount of attention. Usually
I go beyond the call of duty when it comes to elongating words, such as
for example instead of meandermentation I might go with
meandermentationalisticalism.............. That will be my new philosophy.
My philosophies are really quite simple. Idiotic even. But by giving them
ultra long titles tend not to read them. Then I can say they can't argue
against my philosophies because they don't know anything about them.
That's the whole trick, finagle people into not reading my philosophies so
I can later tell them they don't read them because they are too way out
and profound to understand. I am basically full of shit and I love it because
it's all I've got. Thanks for your inspiring coo coo complementational
concurmentism.