Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"too low a" vs. "a too low"

330 views
Skip to first unread message

Jaakov

unread,
Apr 19, 2016, 8:57:53 PM4/19/16
to
Dear all:

Consider the sentence:

"The existence of a link between depression and too low a level of
omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
studies."

Why not

"The existence of a link between depression and a too low level of
omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
studies."

?

What is the general rule of the position of "too <adverb> a/an <noun>"
vs. "a too <adverb> <noun>"? Is there a difference between AE and BE or
between formal writing, informal writing and oral English?

Thanks in advance,

Jaakov

PS.
Historically, Webster's dictionary from 1817 says
"Underrate, n. too low a price",
"Undervalue, n. a too low value".
The varying positions of the article are weird.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

Dingbat

unread,
Apr 19, 2016, 9:10:37 PM4/19/16
to
On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 6:27:53 AM UTC+5:30, Jaakov wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> Consider the sentence:
>
> "The existence of a link between depression and too low a level of
> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
> studies."
>
> Why not
>
> "The existence of a link between depression and a too low level of
> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
> studies."
>
If you want to put "a" first, this is how you can do it:
"The existence of a link between depression and a very low level of omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific studies."
>
> What is the general rule of the position of "too <adverb> a/an <noun>"
> vs. "a too <adverb> <noun>"?
>
Don't know. I don't teach grammar; I use it.
>
> Is there a difference between AE and BE or
> between formal writing, informal writing and oral English?
>
It's "too low a" in all of those.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jaakov
>
> PS.
> Historically, Webster's dictionary from 1817 says
> "Underrate, n. too low a price",
> "Undervalue, n. a too low value".
> The varying positions of the article are weird.
>
The latter looks weird as per current standards.
Undervalue is a verb now, not a noun.
>
According to this, it was always a verb:

Word Origin and History for undervalue
v.
1590s, "to rate as inferior in value" (to), from under + value (v.). Sense of "to estimate or esteem too low" is recorded from 1610s. Meaning "to rate at too low a monetary value" is attested from 1620s.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/undervalue

Jaakov

unread,
Apr 19, 2016, 9:39:15 PM4/19/16
to
On 20.04.2016 03:10, Dingbat wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 6:27:53 AM UTC+5:30, Jaakov wrote:
>> Dear all:
>>
>> Consider the sentence:
>>
>> "The existence of a link between depression and too low a level of
>> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
>> studies."
>>
>> Why not
>>
>> "The existence of a link between depression and a too low level of
>> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
>> studies."
>>
> If you want to put "a" first, this is how you can do it:
> "The existence of a link between depression and a very low level of omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific studies."
Thanks!

>>
>> What is the general rule of the position of "too <adverb> a/an <noun>"
>> vs. "a too <adverb> <noun>"?
>>
> Don't know. I don't teach grammar; I use it.
>>
>> Is there a difference between AE and BE or
>> between formal writing, informal writing and oral English?
>>
> It's "too low a" in all of those.
>>

Thanks again!

Fred

unread,
Apr 19, 2016, 10:23:37 PM4/19/16
to
On 20/04/2016 1:10 p.m., Dingbat wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 6:27:53 AM UTC+5:30, Jaakov wrote:
>> Dear all:
>>
>> Consider the sentence:
>>
>> "The existence of a link between depression and too low a level of
>> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
>> studies."
>>
>> Why not
>>
>> "The existence of a link between depression and a too low level of
>> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
>> studies."
>>
> If you want to put "a" first, this is how you can do it:
> "The existence of a link between depression and a very low level of omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific studies."



That changes the meaning. The level could be too low without being a
very low level. You could say a level that is too low; or a level too
low in omega ........

Athel Cornish-Bowden

unread,
Apr 20, 2016, 4:15:40 AM4/20/16
to
On 2016-04-20 01:10:34 +0000, Dingbat said:

> On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 6:27:53 AM UTC+5:30, Jaakov wrote:
>> Dear all:
>>
>> Consider the sentence:
>>
>> "The existence of a link between depression and too low a level of
>> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
>> studies."
>>
>> Why not
>>
>> "The existence of a link between depression and a too low level of
>> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
>> studies."
>>
> If you want to put "a" first, this is how you can do it:
> "The existence of a link between depression and a very low level of
> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several
> scientific studies."

No: "very low" doesn't mean the same as "too low". "A too low" isn't
very elegant, but it's common enough in this sort of writing; probably
in a medical paper you'd get "an excessively low", but I wouldn't be
particularly surprised to read the original sentence. Mind you, a
scientist would be more likely to omit the word "scientific", which
would be taken as given. Including it marks the writer as a quack of
some kind.
>>
>> What is the general rule of the position of "too <adverb> a/an <noun>"
>> vs. "a too <adverb> <noun>"?
>>
> Don't know. I don't teach grammar; I use it.
>>
>> Is there a difference between AE and BE or
>> between formal writing, informal writing and oral English?
>>
> It's "too low a" in all of those.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Jaakov
>>
>> PS.
>> Historically, Webster's dictionary from 1817 says
>> "Underrate, n. too low a price",
>> "Undervalue, n. a too low value".
>> The varying positions of the article are weird.
>>
> The latter looks weird as per current standards.
> Undervalue is a verb now, not a noun.
>>
> According to this, it was always a verb:
>
> Word Origin and History for undervalue
> v.
> 1590s, "to rate as inferior in value" (to), from under + value (v.).
> Sense of "to estimate or esteem too low" is recorded from 1610s.
> Meaning "to rate at too low a monetary value" is attested from 1620s.
> http://www.dictionary.com/browse/undervalue


--
athel

Stan Brown

unread,
Apr 20, 2016, 4:45:27 AM4/20/16
to
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:57:48 +0200, Jaakov wrote:
> Consider the sentence:
>
> "The existence of a link between depression and too low a level of
> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
> studies."
>
> Why not
>
> "The existence of a link between depression and a too low level of
> omega-3 fatty acids in the body has been indicated in several scientific
> studies."

I'm afraid it's just idiom. Sorry! "A too low level" is
grammatical, but a native speaker wouldn't say it.

I speak AmE, but I believe it's the same in BrE as well.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://BrownMath.com/
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
"The difference between the /almost right/ word and the
/right/ word is ... the difference between the lightning-bug
and the lightning." --Mark Twain
0 new messages