On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:36:18 -0700, Charles Bishop <
ctbi...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>In article <
1qfat91ski30oej0d...@4ax.com>,
> Steve Hayes <
haye...@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>
>> Nevertheless, I've been referring to our local ex-freeway as a tollway since
>> last December, and no longer use it.
>
>What were the conditions for the change? Is there less traffic on it
>now, which would make it desirable for some to use?
>
>Anyhow, they recently did something similar here, BUT, there are no
>tollbooths, you need to have a transponder (which identifies your car
>and then money is removed (or charged to) your account for the toll.
>HOWEVER, there is no restricted access and anyone can enter the freeway.
>BUT, there are signs that are hard to read or understand at speed, that
>say you have 48 hours to go online and pay the toll. If you don't, they
>track you down, send you a traffic ticket with a fine that is more than
>the toll.
Yes, that's what they have had on our ex-freeway since 3 December, and there
have been numerous protests, many boycott it by not travelling on it, others
boycott it by not buying an e-tag and waiting for them to send a bill, and
some by not paying the bill even when it is sent.
They introduced it a few months before an election, and the ruling party's
majority in this province dropped significantly in the election, so now they
are hinting at second thoughts about it, since the amount of uncollected tolls
by far exceeds their ability to collect them. .
>Toll roads work perfectly well back East, don't know why they have so
>much trouble here.
In the past all roads here were paid for be a fuel tax and licence fees, which
everyone thought was fair and worked on the "user pays" principle. Then in
1975 the government robbed the road fund to pay for the invasion of Angola,
and introduced toll roads to make up the deficit.