* Stefan Ram:
> You might have noticed the recent use of "thing"
> in expressions such as:
>
>|Also I love how Hank and Cristobal are now a thing - Web
>|Somehow money is now a thing in the startrek universe. - Web
>|beaching a ship while spawncamping them is now a thing. - Web
For clarity, these are all instances of the usage "be [now] a thing".
> . Recently I thought that maybe this is based on
> the older use of "there is no such thing as", as in:
>
>|for all, there is no such thing as an escape possible,« said - Dickens
>|for him there is no such thing as wrong. And he does not in - Twain
>| of fact, there is no such thing as Shakespeare's Hamlet. If - Wilde
>
> . Actually, when taken literally, all these expressions
> make quite some sense, as "thing" can be taken to mean
> "entity" in the sense of "something that exists", and
> so "to be a thing" = "to be an entity" literally means
> "exist".
I feel that it means more than that. Things that "are [now] a thing"
usually existed beforehand, but have become nameable, utterable,
allowable as a subject of conversation. They have entered the collective
consciousness as separate from other notions, and as being of
significance.
Mere existence doesn't make something "a thing". It has to be observable
in a systematic fashion to come to the attention of individual humans,
and further, it has to be named in some kind of symbolic system (usually
language) to be a subject of social exchange. Mostly, "things" (objects)
are only those in the last stage, isolated from the continuum of
existence by the human mind.
--
Nobody's God says hate your neighbor
Even if the neighbor doesn't believe in God
Put aside your religion do your God a favor
-- The Roches, Everyone is Good