On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 3:37:59 PM UTC-8, Madhu wrote:
> * Jerry Friedman <b9c631ba-93ac-416b-87b6-3b762212c717n @
googlegroups.com> :
> Wrote on Wed, 8 Feb 2023 20:32:53 -0800 (PST):
> >> * Professor ‘J’ , 2/2011-7/2011, TIFR, Mumbai
> >> * Institute Chair Professor, 8/2011- till date, IIT Bombay
> >>
> >> (retrieved today - but I believe he's retired)
> >
> > Wait, there's a TIFR Mumbai but an IIT Bombay?
> Actually I remember it was IIT Powai when I was in Mumbai in the first
> half of the first decade. (Powai isi a suburb but TIFR was in south
> mumbai, lands end and built on the location of a former British mental
> asylum)
>
Powai, on line 6 of the Mumbai metro, is now probably considered to be
in Mumbai.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_6_(Mumbai_Metro)
https://mumbaimap360.com/mumbai---bombay-metro-map
>
I knew a builder in further out Thane who called it a suburb of Mumbai.
It's actually an independent city of 2.5 million but perhaps calling it
a suburb of Mumbai helped sell the flats he built. OTOH, it too is on
the Mumbai metro, so perhaps it's a de facto suburb.
>
The Mumbai Metro extends even further out, till Kalyan. Too far to be a
suburb, that has to be an exurb.
>
> The rebranding to IIT Bombay must have happened after then. I think it
> is the same with IIT Madras -- where i remember the board or some
> authority explicitly rejected the calls to name change.
>
IIT Bombay and IIT Madras are their names, not their addresses.
They are in Mumbai and Chennai, respectively. Chennai's University of
Madras, Madras Institute of Technology and Madras Christian College
haven't changed their names either. But, perhaps to keep Tamil
chauvinists from forcing a name change, the name of IIT Madras is
written in the Tamil script as IIT Chennai; it's in the Latin and Devanagari
scripts that it remains IIT Madras. I haven't looked into how U Madras is
written in the Tamil script.
>
> It fits in with the spirit colonial institutions that are charged with
> sending the loot of the colony to their foreign masters.
>
I'm not sure what are the compulsions to retain or change colonial names
when they happen to be coined by the colonial power. But that issue is not
relevant to India if India's major metros' English names were not coined by
the colonial power, i.e., the British. Those names were not coined as British
colonial names but adapted when borrowed into English from other
languages, so India's chauvinists are technically wrong to insinuate that
any desire to retain them must have stemmed from unpatriotic loyalty to
British colonialists. Bombay came from Portuguese Bom baia, Delhi from
Hindi/Hindustani Dilli, Calcutta from Bengali Kalikhetro from Sanskrit
Kalikshetra, Madras from a Portuguese name per one analysis, and
Bangalore from Tamil/Kannada Bangalur/Bengalur. It's gross that Kannada
chauvinists forced a change in English name from Bangalore to Bengaluru
forcing English speakers to use their u suffix in all contexts since Kannada
(and Tamil) speakers use that u suffix only in nominative contexts.
>
Also, not all Indians agree that a change in English name is a name change;
many hold that the change retains an Indian name protecting the name
from changing to the English name in Indian languages too. Only Delhi, of
India's top metros, retains a different name in English; its Hindi name has
long been Dilli. Interestingly, its Malayalam name is Dellhee, not Dellie and
the New in New Delhi, now commonly dropped in other languages, has
never been in its Malayalam name.