On 8/14/2016 11:25 PM, Helen Lacedaemonian wrote:
> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 11:24:46 AM UTC-7, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 2:11:58 PM UTC-4, Helen Lacedaemonian wrote:
>>> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 11:01:15 AM UTC-7, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 12:39:49 PM UTC-4, Hannelore VB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Trying to find out where "gall" comes from, where one could "guess" that
>>>>> it's either from "gall bladder" bitterness or from "gaul soldiers" as per
>>>>> the Roman depiction of the naked fallen warrior.
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/gall
>>>>
>>>> Look for "Medieval doctrine of the Four Humours." Gall = yellow bile.
>>>>
>>>> It's sort of like the Eastern doctrine of "chi" ("qi"?) -- in a healthy
>>>> person the four humours are balanced.
>>>>
>>>> If you have too much phlegm, you're phlegmatic;
>>>> if you have too much yellow bile, you're bilious;
>>>> if you have too much blood, you're sanguine;
>>>> if you have too much black bile, you're melancholic.
>>>
>>> Yes, but this meaning of "gall" is different. Not a bitter substance provoking
>>> ill temper, but bold, impudent behavior. Something akin to "chutzpah."
>>
>> The difference between gall and chutzpah is probably a matter of point-of-view.
>>
>> (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and all that.)
>
> Interesting. Do you hear a difference between gall and chutzpah? I don't.
> What about nerve, audacity, balls? I feel they can all be used admiringly or
> with irritation--so I don't really see how this usage of "gall" can claim an
> obvious derivation from the bitter humor
by the gallbladder. I am not sure when this semantic shift
(and/or anatomical confusion) happened. Traditionally, the