Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"every day and twice on Sunday"

2,430 views
Skip to first unread message

meirm...@erols.com

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 10:28:50 AM8/28/01
to
"every day and twice on Sunday"

Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40 years
ago?

**Is it a figure of speech?


mei...@QQQerols.com If you email me, please let me know whether
remove the QQQ or not you are posting the same letter.

R H Draney

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 12:02:33 PM8/28/01
to
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:28:50 -0400, meirm...@erols.com wrote:

>"every day and twice on Sunday"
>
>Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
>especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40 years
>ago?

Just a guess here, but I'd say stage performances, circuses, and the
like...there'd be one performance each day of the week, except Sunday,
when they'd put on both an early and a late show....

I imagine its use now is limited to the strictly literal...used any
other way it sounds as quaint as "big as life and twice as natural" or
"all wool and a yard wide"....r

Ben Zimmer

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 1:16:38 PM8/28/01
to

R H Draney wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:28:50 -0400, meirm...@erols.com wrote:
>
> >"every day and twice on Sunday"
> >
> >Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
> >especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40 years
> >ago?
>
> Just a guess here, but I'd say stage performances, circuses, and the
> like...there'd be one performance each day of the week, except Sunday,
> when they'd put on both an early and a late show....


A more obvious origin would be church services.


--Ben

K1912

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 1:33:20 PM8/28/01
to
Ben Zimmer wrote:

And an even more obviouser origin would be newlyweds.


Ben Zimmer

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 1:51:58 PM8/28/01
to


Or how about the "circuit riders" who helped establish Methodism on the
U.S. frontier (late 18th - early 19th centuries)?

----------
http://www.bartleby.com/65/ci/circuitr.html

The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001.

circuit rider

itinerant preacher of the Methodist denomination who served a “circuit”
consisting usually of 20 to 40 “appointments.” The circuit system,
devised by John Wesley for his English societies in their formative
period and developed in America by Francis Asbury, proved especially
adapted to the conditions of the American frontier and came into its own
in the trans-Allegheny region. Its success was a factor in establishing
Methodism in America. The circuit rider, traveling usually on horseback
because it was economical and suited to the forest pathways, preached
nearly every day and twice on Sundays, thus covering his circuit every
four or five weeks. His appointments were usually in pioneer cabins,
schoolhouses, or tavern barrooms
----------

--Ben

Murray Arnow

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 2:20:07 PM8/28/01
to

I'm reminded of the Yiddish expression "alle montig und donnerstig" which
literally translates to "every Monday and Thursday" and means a frequent
occurrence. Its origin is also "church" based; every Tuesday and Thursday the
Torah is removed from the Ark.

Skitt

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 2:38:14 PM8/28/01
to

"R H Draney" <dado...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3b8bbff0....@news.earthlink.net...

The "big as life" saying I know was "Big as life and twice as ugly." I've
never heard your version.
--
Skitt (in SF Bay Area) http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
I speak English well -- I learn it from a book!
-- Manuel of "Fawlty Towers" (he's from Barcelona).


Aaron Davies

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 6:33:11 PM8/28/01
to
Skitt <sk...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> "R H Draney" <dado...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:3b8bbff0....@news.earthlink.net...
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:28:50 -0400, meirm...@erols.com wrote:
> >
> > >"every day and twice on Sunday"
> > >
> > >Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
> > >especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40 years
> > >ago?
> >
> > Just a guess here, but I'd say stage performances, circuses, and the
> > like...there'd be one performance each day of the week, except Sunday,
> > when they'd put on both an early and a late show....
> >
> > I imagine its use now is limited to the strictly literal...used any
> > other way it sounds as quaint as "big as life and twice as natural" or
> > "all wool and a yard wide"....r
>
> The "big as life" saying I know was "Big as life and twice as ugly." I've
> never heard your version.

I've never heard either of them, but Lewis Carroll originated one
version in one of the Alice books: "Large as life and twice as real".
--
__ __
/ ) / )
/--/ __. __ ______ / / __. , __o _ _
/ (_(_/|_/ (_(_) / <_ /__/_(_/|_\/ <__</_/_)_

Odysseus

unread,
Aug 29, 2001, 4:41:28 AM8/29/01
to
Skitt wrote:
> >
> > I imagine its use now is limited to the strictly literal...used any
> > other way it sounds as quaint as "big as life and twice as natural" or
> > "all wool and a yard wide"....r
>
> The "big as life" saying I know was "Big as life and twice as ugly." I've
> never heard your version.

I've heard both, but almost always with "large as ...", I think. I've
generally considered the "ugly" version to be a nonce variation on Lewis
Carroll's phrase.

By the way, for Aaron: the latter has "natural", not "real" -- see
_Through the Looking Glass_, ch. 7, where Haigha is explaining to the
Unicorn that Alice isn't a "fabulous monster".

--Odysseus

Mike Oliver

unread,
Aug 29, 2001, 5:24:14 AM8/29/01
to
Odysseus wrote:

> By the way, for Aaron: the latter has "natural", not "real" -- see
> _Through the Looking Glass_, ch. 7, where Haigha is explaining to the
> Unicorn that Alice isn't a "fabulous monster".

I love this usage (the most precise possible, I guess) of
"fabulous". It brings to mind the idea that Alice might have
been a just-OK monster.

I remember being terribly confused, as a lad, by L. Frank Baum's
phrase "Oz, the Great and Terrible". I mean, if he's *great*,
then how can he be *terrible*?

Robert Lieblich

unread,
Aug 29, 2001, 9:42:19 AM8/29/01
to
Mike Oliver wrote:
>
> Odysseus wrote:
>
> > By the way, for Aaron: the latter has "natural", not "real" -- see
> > _Through the Looking Glass_, ch. 7, where Haigha is explaining to the
> > Unicorn that Alice isn't a "fabulous monster".
>
> I love this usage (the most precise possible, I guess) of
> "fabulous". It brings to mind the idea that Alice might have
> been a just-OK monster.

I fell in love with Alice and her books in the late Forties and
reread them frequently into the early Fifties, just about the time
that the vogue usage of "fabulous" was at its peak. I was saved by
the love of a good dictionary, which told me the "other" meaning of
"fabulous." I don't have Gardner's *Annotated Alice* handy, so I
can't check and see whether he found it necessary to clarify this
point.


>
> I remember being terribly confused, as a lad, by L. Frank Baum's
> phrase "Oz, the Great and Terrible". I mean, if he's *great*,
> then how can he be *terrible*?

It's like that Russian Czar known as Ivan Grozny, usually translated
as "Ivan the Terrible." I mean, he wasn't all *that* bad a czar,
was he? (Okay, I'll grant you a bit ill-tempered.)

Evan Kirshenbaum

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 3:53:52 PM8/28/01
to
"Skitt" <sk...@earthlink.net> writes:

> "R H Draney" <dado...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:3b8bbff0....@news.earthlink.net...

> > I imagine its use now is limited to the strictly literal...used
> > any other way it sounds as quaint as "big as life and twice as
> > natural" or "all wool and a yard wide"....r
>
> The "big as life" saying I know was "Big as life and twice as ugly."
> I've never heard your version.

`This is a child!' Haigha replied eagerly, coming in front of
Alice to introduce her, and spreading out both his hands towards
her in an Anglo-Saxon attitude. `We only found it to-day. It's as
large as life, and twice as natural!'

_Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There_,
chapter 7.

According to Gardner, this was a Carrollian play on a then-common
expression: "large as life and quite as natural".

--
Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------
HP Laboratories |The skinny models whose main job is
1501 Page Mill Road, Building 1U |to display clothes aren't hired for
Palo Alto, CA 94304 |their sex appeal. They're hired
|for their resemblance to a
kirsh...@hpl.hp.com |coat-hanger.
(650)857-7572 | Peter Moylan

http://www.kirshenbaum.net/


R H Draney

unread,
Aug 29, 2001, 11:33:39 AM8/29/01
to
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:42:19 -0400, Robert Lieblich
<Robert....@Verizon.net> wrote:

>I fell in love with Alice and her books in the late Forties and
>reread them frequently into the early Fifties, just about the time
>that the vogue usage of "fabulous" was at its peak. I was saved by
>the love of a good dictionary, which told me the "other" meaning of
>"fabulous." I don't have Gardner's *Annotated Alice* handy, so I
>can't check and see whether he found it necessary to clarify this
>point.

I occasionally avail myself of the opportunity to sneak in a sarcastic
comment, knowing that at least some of my audience will miss the
joke...when asked my opinion of some scheme that I feel is completely
unworkable, I'll just smile and say "it's fantastic!"...

>Mike Oliver wrote:
>
>> I remember being terribly confused, as a lad, by L. Frank Baum's
>> phrase "Oz, the Great and Terrible". I mean, if he's *great*,
>> then how can he be *terrible*?
>
>It's like that Russian Czar known as Ivan Grozny, usually translated
>as "Ivan the Terrible." I mean, he wasn't all *that* bad a czar,
>was he? (Okay, I'll grant you a bit ill-tempered.)

See Monty Python for an acknowledgement of the confusion on this one:

Announcer: ...the terrible "Njörl's Saga!"
Njörl: It's not *that* terrible....
Announcer: No, I meant "terribly violent"
Njörl: Oh, yeah....

And a bit later:

Announcer: Sorry for that terrible mix-up just then.
Njörl: It wasn't all *that* terrible....
Announcer: No, I meant "terrible" in the sense of
"unfortunate"....r

uknd...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 25, 2016, 8:52:18 PM6/25/16
to
Probably twice on Sunday because Satan's counterfeit Christian Churches usually have two church services on sundays... one in the morning and one in the evening... see 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 for why I call them Satans...

Dingbat

unread,
Jun 26, 2016, 1:03:01 AM6/26/16
to
On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 6:22:18 AM UTC+5:30, uknd...@gmail.com wrote:
> Probably twice on Sunday because Satan's counterfeit Christian Churches usually have two church services on sundays... one in the morning and one in the evening... see 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 for why I call them Satans...

Here's a guess. 'Satan's counterfeit churches' are not the church(es) you go to; they're churches that people other that you go to. Correct?

Jack Campin

unread,
Jun 26, 2016, 4:07:12 AM6/26/16
to
Why are you you bothering us when you could be saving up machine
guns for a blazing inferno last stand against Satan's government?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
e m a i l : j a c k @ c a m p i n . m e . u k
Jack Campin, 11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
mobile 07800 739 557 <http://www.campin.me.uk> Twitter: JackCampin

arthu...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 27, 2016, 7:40:51 PM6/27/16
to
'Once every day and twice on Sunday' seems like a contradiction to me. Isn't Sunday a day, after all?

Gratefully,
Navi.

Tony Cooper

unread,
Jun 27, 2016, 8:41:05 PM6/27/16
to
It isn't supposed be logical. It's an expression. Similar to giving
110% effort or "the biggest lie". Or something described as
"ubiquitous" in this group when the meaning intended is "often".
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

David Kleinecke

unread,
Jun 27, 2016, 8:53:50 PM6/27/16
to
Compare - Vote early and often.

Reinhold {Rey} Aman

unread,
Jun 27, 2016, 9:36:46 PM6/27/16
to
arthu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2001 <=============
>> "every day and twice on Sunday"
>
--
~~~ Reinhold {Rey} Aman ~~~

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Jun 27, 2016, 11:27:59 PM6/27/16
to
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 7:40:51 PM UTC-4, arthu...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2001 at 7:28:50 AM UTC-7, meirm...@erols.com wrote:

> 'Once every day and twice on Sunday' seems like a contradiction to me. Isn't Sunday a day, after all?

Are you saying that wasn't original to the libretto for *Albert Herring* --

"Girls mean
Spring six
Days a week
Twice on
Sundays"

(lineated the way Sid's music has it come out).

Peter Moylan

unread,
Jun 28, 2016, 4:14:42 AM6/28/16
to
On 2016-Jun-28 09:40, arthu...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2001 at 7:28:50 AM UTC-7, meirm...@erols.com wrote:
>> "every day and twice on Sunday"
>>
>> Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
>> especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40 years
>> ago?
>>
>> **Is it a figure of speech?
>
> 'Once every day and twice on Sunday' seems like a contradiction to me. Isn't Sunday a day, after all?

The original thread expired from my server long ago, so I don't know
whether this has been covered. Anyway, the expression I know is "six
times a week and twice on Sunday".

--
Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW, Australia

Athel Cornish-Bowden

unread,
Jun 28, 2016, 4:36:15 AM6/28/16
to
That was my thought, too.

--
athel

occam

unread,
Jun 28, 2016, 7:55:50 AM6/28/16
to
On 28/06/2016 10:14, Peter Moylan wrote:

>>
>> 'Once every day and twice on Sunday' seems like a contradiction to me. Isn't Sunday a day, after all?
>
> The original thread expired from my server long ago, so I don't know
> whether this has been covered. Anyway, the expression I know is "six
> times a week and twice on Sunday".
>

The question stands, even in your version of the expression. Is 'twice
on Sunday' included in the count 'six times a week'? Sunday is part of
the week after all.

Will Parsons

unread,
Jun 28, 2016, 11:16:05 AM6/28/16
to
My thought is that even viewed perfectly logically, there is no
contradiction. "Every day" includes Sunday; if it's done twice on
Sunday, it's done perforce once also.

--
Will

Robert Bannister

unread,
Jun 28, 2016, 11:48:37 PM6/28/16
to
My feeling is that Sunday in Christian countries was always counted as
something separate from the normal working week which included Saturday.
Now that Sunday is just part of the weekend and a great number of people
work over the weekend anyway, we think differently.

--
Robert B. born England a long time ago;
Western Australia since 1972

Wayne Brown

unread,
Jun 29, 2016, 11:41:34 AM6/29/16
to
The version I've always heard was not "Once every day..." but simply
"Every day and twice on Sunday" which fits your interpretation
even better.

--
F. Wayne Brown <fwb...@bellsouth.net>

ur sag9-ga ur-tur-še3 ba-an-kur9
"A dog that is played with turns into a puppy." (Sumerian proverb)

charles

unread,
Jun 29, 2016, 12:08:53 PM6/29/16
to
In article <nl0q7b$lt0$2...@dont-email.me>, Wayne Brown
<fwb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:16:02 in article
> <slrnnn555i...@anukis.local> Will Parsons <va...@nodomain.invalid>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 Jun 2016 4:36 AM -0400, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> >> On 2016-06-27 23:40:48 +0000, arthu...@gmail.com said:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, August 28, 2001 at 7:28:50 AM UTC-7, meirm...@erols.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "every day and twice on Sunday"
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
> >>>> especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40
> >>>> years ago?
> >>>>
> >>>> **Is it a figure of speech?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> mei...@QQQerols.com If you email me, please let me know whether
> >>>> remove the QQQ or not you are posting the same letter.
> >>>
> >>> 'Once every day and twice on Sunday' seems like a contradiction to
> >>> me. Isn't Sunday a day, after all?
> >>
> >> That was my thought, too.
> >
> > My thought is that even viewed perfectly logically, there is no
> > contradiction. "Every day" includes Sunday; if it's done twice on
> > Sunday, it's done perforce once also.

> The version I've always heard was not "Once every day..." but simply
> "Every day and twice on Sunday" which fits your interpretation even
> better.

and there's "Once a knight always a knight - twice a night and you're doing
all right"

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England

katmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 18, 2019, 2:31:59 AM12/18/19
to
On Tuesday, August 28, 2001 at 10:28:50 AM UTC-4, meirm...@erols.com wrote:
> "every day and twice on Sunday"
>
> Does anyone know the source of this expression/figure of speech**,
> especially the original source? Is it used as much as it was 40 years
> ago?
>
> **Is it a figure of speech?
>
>
> mei...@QQQerols.com If you email me, please let me know whether
> remove the QQQ or not you are posting the same letter.

hola como sta

chun...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 7, 2020, 7:00:38 PM7/7/20
to

chun...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 7, 2020, 7:07:54 PM7/7/20
to
On Wednesday, August 29, 2001 at 10:24:14 AM UTC+1, Mike Oliver wrote:
I'm a little confused by this post by your lack of comprehension I suppose.
Fabulous does mean fantastic but not only that it's derived from 'Fables' so when he says she isn't a fabulous monster he means she's real & not a fictitious apparition.

Regards 'The Great & Terrible' you've been to rigid in your interpretation of great again. Great might mean fantastic now also but it's main meaning pertains to a large size so he's just saying he's big/powerful & terrible

Lewis

unread,
Jul 7, 2020, 8:56:12 PM7/7/20
to
Most people don't know what Terrible in "The Great and Terrible Oz"
means.

It doesn't mean bad, it means "inspiring terror/fear."

Imagine a grizzly bear charging at you. That is The Great and Terrible
Bear.

--
"Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to
those of us who do." - Isaac Asimov

Kerr-Mudd,John

unread,
Jul 8, 2020, 6:16:27 AM7/8/20
to
It's a (probably flyby) gmail 'user' resurrecting an old thread.

--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
0 new messages