On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 7:17:57 AM UTC-4, occam wrote:
> On 23/05/2022 17:18, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > I hope you guys are proud of yourselves. There's now a flood of sex
> > ads in that thread -- the one you fertilized with your oh-so-clever
> > commentaries on sex ads. Before you started rejuvenating it, there
> > was at most a trickle -- maybe one a week -- easy to skip over because
> > the thread was marked as Abuse.
> Whine, whine, whine! Stop bitching, you bitch.
>
> Your grasp of spam is very sketchy. That you think replying to a spam
> message 'fertilises' the source is a consequence of your dismal grasp of
> the issues. These mass posts (to countless NGs) rely on people clicking
> on the links provided in the message. Responding to the messages
> themselves makes no difference at all - except in providing
> entertainment those who make the best of a bad situation.
Explain, genius, why suddenly the number of sex ads in the thread
surged _after_ the thread began being filled with messages from
AUEistas. If the spambot sees that its messages get results, it
increases its efforts where the results are. I see no crosspostings,
so I have no idea how many dead newsgroups some of the "clever"
respondents are sending their information to, but wherever they
go, they are begging for more.
> This is your second warning, PTD. Three strikes and you are out!
>
> Signed
>
> For, and on behalf of,
>
> The Committee
Fraudster.