> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:29:38 +1000, Peter Moylan
> <inv...@peter.pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>>musika wrote:
>
>>> Are you suggesting that a warlock locks wars?
>>
>>Close. He locks wards.
>
> Got a source for that?
>
> Most of the books that I've read that use it say or imply that he breaks
> oaths.
>
> I looked it up on Wikipedia, where there is a rather unsatisfactory
> article.
>
> Reliable information seems to be hard to come by.
The OED derives it from Old English "w�r-loga" (traitor, enemy, devil,
etc.). "W�r" is "true", and "loga" is an agent related to "l�ogan"
(lie, belie, deny). The oldest sense is "oath breaker".
--
Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------
Still with HP Labs |If I am ever forced to make a
SF Bay Area (1982-) |choice between learning and using
Chicago (1964-1982) |win32, or leaving the computer
|industry, let me just say it was
evan.kir...@gmail.com |nice knowing all of you. :-)
| Randal Schwartz
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:20:10 -0700, Evan Kirshenbaum
><evan.kir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>The OED derives it from Old English "wær-loga" (traitor, enemy, devil,
>>etc.). "Wær" is "true", and "loga" is an agent related to "léogan"
>>(lie, belie, deny). The oldest sense is "oath breaker".
(I'm pretty sure that "wær" is cognate with German "wahr" and Latin
"verus".)
> So I'm wondering where locking wards comes into it.
Well, ISTR a spell in D&D called "wizard lock"...
--
Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results,
but that's not why we do it. [Richard Feynman]
The only other explanation was Society of Crystallographers in Australia
and New Zealand, but I thought this less likely.
--
Robert Bannister