Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:49:42 +0100, Will Parsons <va...@nodomain.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:03:47 +0100, Bertel Lund Hansen <
gade...@lundhansen.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tough Guy no. 1265 skrev:
>>>>
>>>>> Everyone in my entire life has said flassid. Until I read this
>>>>> thread, I thought that was the only way to pronounce it (in
>>>>> the UK, America may be different I guess). How else would you
>>>>> sensibly pronounce a word spelt like that?
>>>>
>>>> There is a simple rule about c that works in all the European
>>>> languages that I know:
>>>>
>>>> 1. If e, i or y follows, the c is pronounced as an s.
>>>> 2. If not, it is pronounced as a k.
>>>>
>>>> "Success", "access", "flaccid" and "succinylcholin" should all
>>>> have "ks", while "flocculus" and "occult" only have k.
>>>
>>> Have you made a typo in the above? For example success has an "e" following the "c"s. So you'd say "sussess", as per rule 1.
>>
>> By "follows", "immediately follows" is implied, so you wouldn't.
>
> But E does immediately follow the C in success.
There are two C's. The first is followed by another C, so is