"Harrison Hill" wrote in message
news:4e3c1427-3747-4f47...@o30g2000vbu.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 10, 3:40 am, "Guy Barry" <
guy.ba...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > This one definitely wasn't a mishearing. "What is it that makes this
> > group
> > cohese, as a group?" (Presenter on "The Strand", BBC World Service arts
> > programme)
>
> > (And I'm not sure what "as a group" was meant to add either.)
> With "cohere" and "cohesion" so close to each other in the dictionary
> I wouldn't even think this is an error - merely a normal, everyday
> usage the dictionaries have failed to pick up.
No matches at the British National Corpus. A Google Search bring up:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3631728/I-cohere-you-cohere-lets-all-cohese.html
(presumably a joke, as it's only used in the title)
http://cohese.com/ (the name of a media production company, so presumably a
made-up word)
http://www.chacha.com/question/what-does-cohese-mean (answer: "it's not in
the dictionary. Did you mean 'coerce'?)
and then
http://www.wordnik.com/words/cohese ("sorry, no definitions
found").
The last site, Wordnik, does list three examples. Curiously, I have only
ever come across this site once before: when looking for occurrences of
"foresquare", another spelling that you claimed was in normal usage but
doesn't appear to exist. I presume it must scour the Web for any
occurrences of a word, whether they're correct or not. A handful of
incorrect examples doesn't provide evidence of a word in actual usage.
I can see how it might have come about as a back-formation from "cohesion",
but only if the speaker was unaware of the verb "cohere" (which the writer
of the above-mentioned Telegraph article appeared to be, as she had to look
it up in the dictionary).
--
Guy Barry