On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 2:30:27 AM UTC-7, Yilaner wrote:
> Roads were blocked by fallen branches amid heavy winds and lashing rain in
> southern Taiwan.
>
> Howling winds continue to pound the area.
To me plural winds signifies wind that changes direction and speed, not necessarily rapidly, or that are not consistent over the area.
> Heavy rains caused flooding and landslides in many areas of the city.
To me plural rains signifies rain that comes and goes, as it were, or that isn't falling at the same rate over the area.
> with heavy rain and screaming wind.
That seems to signify what one might experience at any given time in a random location in the area- a general condition rather than a specific event, if you see what I mean.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Is it a matter of style or correctness? For me, I don't find any obvious
> rules about when to choose the singular form and when when to use the plural
> form. In most cases, is it a safe bet to just use rain in its singular form
> and wind in its plural form?
Style more than correctness, but there's no clear distinction. What you get from weather reporters is what's most dramatic, not what most accurately describes the development of events over time. As others have said here are no general rules, but with experience you come to see the appropriateness of singulars and plurals in given contexts.
What I want to know is, when we say "it's raining" or "it's windy" or "it's cold", what is "it"? It's not the sky (as PTD said the sky isn't an object) and even if it were, why should I care if it's cold twenty thousand feet above where I am? Worse, in desert areas there's virga which is rain that evaporates before reaching the ground- you can look up and *see* it coming, then disappearing.
Is it "the weather"? That never seemed quite right to me despite the usual Q&A "How's the weather?" "It's warm".
Dr. HotSalt