>On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:40:28 +1100, Peter Moylan
><inv...@peter.pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Nick Spalding wrote:
>>> retrosorter wrote, in
>>> <
bf745ecb-ff81-457f...@w5g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
>>> on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:09:37 -0800 (PST):
>>>
>>>> I've heard several English-speaking people in Canada, and particularly
>>>> in Quebec, use the term "suss" for "pacifier." I assume this derives
>>>>from the French word for "suck" ("sucer"). Does anyone know if the
>>>> term "suss" is used anywhere else in the world to refer to a pacifier?
>>>
>>> I don't know of one. Here in Ireland the word is 'dodie'; is that
>>> used anywhere else?
>>
>>"Dummy" in Australia. "Pacifier" sounds like one of those super-heroes
>>who go around clobbering their victims.
>
>My first thought too, but if the context is baby care, I recall reading a
>discussion about whether to give a baby a pacifier in one of those third-party
>operating manuals that didn't come with the child but had to be bought
>separately.
>
>I thought it was referring to the patent gripe water we sometimes gave our
>daughter when she yelled all night.
water. When we went to the USA for a while in 1963/4 we found to our