On 10/11/16 10:40 am, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:10:30 +0800, Robert Bannister
> <
rob...@clubtelco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/16 6:09 am, Tony Cooper wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:33:42 -0800 (PST), Jerry Friedman
>>> <
jerry_f...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 12:04:15 PM UTC-7, Tony Cooper wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:17:43 -0000, Janet <
nob...@home.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <
9ei42chvqqsdubddc...@4ax.com>, tonycooper214
>>>>>> @
gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:59:09 -0000, Janet <
nob...@home.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <
0ak12c9lfbsv37j7e...@4ax.com>, tonycooper214
>>>>>>>> @
gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In a book I'm reading one character, reluctant to bother another
>>>>>>>>> character, says of the other character "She could strop for England".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge, "strop" is not used in AmE except as a
>>>>>>>>> archiac term for a strap used to sharpen a straight razor: a razor
>>>>>>>>> strop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The British usage seems to be "in a perpetual bad mood".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No implication of "perpetual".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "having a strop" is just an outburst of annoyance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "stroppy" ; adjective to describe cross person.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Janet
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you describe a person as cross, you are pretty much implying that
>>>>>>> the person is perpetually cross.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not in my English. "Mrs Jones was cross when the cat ate her canary".
>>>>>> One-off event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But that's descriptive of a past time, and it doesn't describe Mrs
>>>>> Jones as cross. "That cross old bat who has the cat that ate her
>>>>> canary" pretty much implies perpetual crossness.
>>>>
>>>> Just like "She could strop for England" (perpetual) and "She got
>>>> stroppy" (momentary).
>>>>
>>>> When you said "the British usage" above, did you mean "She could
>>>> strop for England"? I thought you were referring to the British
>>>> usage of "strop" in general,
>>>
>>> Not in general, but in the specific: to be in a bad mood and be
>>> unpleasant to other people.
>>>
>>>> contrasted with our use.
>>>
>>> You mean our use in "razor strop" when they were used? Wasn't it
>>> called that there?
>>
>> Are you saying razor strops are not still used? Every hairdresser I've
>> been to
>
> You do realize that any American who reads that line giggles at you?
So do your hairdressers not shave the back of your neck when you get a
haircut or do they use a clean safety razor blade on each customer?
>
>> has one and uses it, and I presume those people who use an open
>> razor at home do the same.
>
> As far as I know, straight razors went out with cut-purses.
>
--
Robert B. born England a long time ago;
Western Australia since 1972