Bertel Lund Hansen to Anton Shepelev:
> > encodings, and so do Usenet gateways into FidoNet. I
> > hate to see a post in English ruined by Unicode
> > apostrophes, quotes, and dashes. They are not meant for
> > the plain-text medium of Usenet.
>
> Det ville da vaere en skam hvis jeg ikke laengere kunne
> skrive indlaeg pa dansk.
>
> You mean that UTF is unnessecary in groups where English
> is written, and where there never is even a small quote
> from other languages?
No, only where English (French, Russian, German...) is the
primary language, because 8-bit encodings support all of
them. Bilingual posts with the Latin alphabet may use the
Latin1 endcoding; if a mixture of the Cyrillic and Latin
alphabets is needed, there are Russian (Ukrainian,
Bulgarian) 8-bit encodings -- well supported by the Usenet
protocol, server software, and great old ante~~deluvian~~UTF
fossilised newsreaders.
The tiny proportion of texts where extended character sets
are reauired, can be rendered in ASCII with acceptable
accuracy. Similartly, no one complains that IRC does not
suport images large text messages, because the need share
them is rare, making justified the use of special tools such
as pastebins and image hostings.
> Can you point me to such a group?
Try comp.lang.c . I don't remember a situation where
anything but plain 7-bit ASCII was needed in that group.