On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 22:39:25 -0000 (UTC),
wol...@bimajority.org
(Garrett Wollman) wrote:
>In article <uqvkh9$1sps1$
1...@dont-email.me>,
>Bertel Lund Hansen <
gade...@lundhansen.dk> wrote:
>>Hibou wrote:
>>
>>> It's usual if one doesn't want to be photographed to look daggers at the
>>> camera. Looking lances would count as escalation.
>>>
>>> Whatever, do you mean a still photographer or a TV camera operator?
>>
>>A camera operator. For a Dane they are all photographers (fotografer).
>
>In the US, there is a distinction. We used to use the word
>"videographer" but nowadays for location reporting it's not uncommon
>to call them all "photogs". A "camera operator" would be someone who
>operates a camera in a studio (or remotely, in a control room).
>"Cameraman" is a relic of history.
Really? On any given (American) football game day, you are quite
likely to hear one of the booth people comment on how a player ran
into and over a "cameraman". That would be one of the men (I've never
seen a woman in that job) roaming the sidelines with a huge video
camera hung on his shoulder.
One of my daughter's classmates worked for a network doing just that.
He's no longer on the job, but we used to watch for George on the
sidelines when the Tampa Bay Bucs were playing. George, as far as I
know, is still a network cameraman, but he no longer works football
games. Last I heard, he does remotes for a news team.
There are fewer of them now at football games because of the advent of
overhead cameras that are remotely operated and skitter across wires
above the playing field, but I would hardly say "relic" describes the
function. Today's camera operator at a football game is closer to
being a drone controller than a cameraman.
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/65198de0e10adba9275576c774a026ee93561eac/0_306_4593_2756/master/4593.jpg?width=1200&height=1200&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&s=69a98dc11a00dba8d887f1355837a242
There might be some movement to discontinue the term "cameraman" and
replace it with "camera operator" by HR because of the gender-naming,
but I don't think that extends to the actual usage by those describing
the person.
Even though the cameraman captures images on video, I would not use
"videographer" to describe the function. A videographer generally
produces an entire package...a wedding and reception from start to
finish that includes only the subjects. A cameraman produces bits and
pieces fed into a larger production or images for a production like a
remote where another person provides narration.