On 27/09/22 10:04, Tony Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:53:37 -0700, Ken Blake <
K...@invalid.news.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:44:28 -0400, Bill Day <
ext...@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 21:13:33 +1000, Peter Moylan
>>> <pe...@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24/09/22 00:39, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There's a ubiquitous TV commercial for a, let's say personal
>>>>> care product, which says that if you don't use the product,
>>>>> you get a badness score of 5 or 6 out of 10, over 12 hours;
>>>>> but if you use the product, you get a badness score of 0 over
>>>>> 12 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> The spokesperson then says, "I'm not a mathematician, but I
>>>>> think that means using [our product] is infinitely better
>>>>> than not using it."
>>>>>
>>>>> Clever, no?
>>>>
>>>> There was a laundry detergent with the advertising slogan
>>>> "Nothing washes better than Surf". (I think that was the brand
>>>> in question.) So I tried using nothing. They were right.
>>> "Tide gets clothes cleaner than any soap." "Any soap?" "Yes, any
>>> soap! Tide gets clothes cleaner than any soap..T-I-D-E Tide!"
>>>
>>> 50 year old memory of singing advertising jingle.
>>
>>
>> Use Ajax, the foaming cleanser.
drain". They must have decided that different words worked for different